User:InProgress/Website reviews/PJ - Revision history

FairMormonBot: Bot: Automated text replacement (-{{Articles Header 1}} {{Articles Header 2}} {{Articles Header 3}} {{Articles Header 4}} {{Articles Header 5}} {{Articles Header 6}} {{Articles Header 7}} {{Articles Header 8}} {{Articles Header 9}} +)

2017-06-02T21:52:30Z

Bot: Automated text replacement (-{{Articles Header 1}} {{Articles Header 2}} {{Articles Header 3}} {{Articles Header 4}} {{Articles Header 5}} {{Articles Header 6}} {{Articles Header 7}} {{Articles Header 8}} {{Articles Header 9}} +)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:52, 2 June 2017
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Articles FAIR copyright}} ~~{{Articles Header 1}} {{Articles Header 2}} {{Articles Header 3}} {{Articles Header 4}} {{Articles Header 5}} {{Articles Header 6}} {{Articles Header 7}} {{Articles Header 8}} {{Articles Header 9}}~~		{{Articles FAIR copyright}}
	<onlyinclude>		<onlyinclude>
	__NOTOC__		__NOTOC__

FairMormonBot: Bot: Automated text replacement (-{{Articles Header 10}} +\n)

2017-06-02T18:23:11Z

Bot: Automated text replacement (-{{Articles Header 10}} +\n<onlyinclude>)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:23, 2 June 2017
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Articles FAIR copyright}} {{Articles Header 1}} {{Articles Header 2}} {{Articles Header 3}} {{Articles Header 4}} {{Articles Header 5}} {{Articles Header 6}} {{Articles Header 7}} {{Articles Header 8}} {{Articles Header 9}} ~~{{Articles Header 10}}~~		{{Articles FAIR copyright}} {{Articles Header 1}} {{Articles Header 2}} {{Articles Header 3}} {{Articles Header 4}} {{Articles Header 5}} {{Articles Header 6}} {{Articles Header 7}} {{Articles Header 8}} {{Articles Header 9}}
			<onlyinclude>
	__NOTOC__		__NOTOC__
	{{FAIRAnalysisHeader		{{FAIRAnalysisHeader

RogerNicholson: /* */ mod

2012-06-07T05:14:24Z

: mod

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:14, 7 June 2012
Line 47:		Line 47:
	\|think=		\|think=
	*Scholars have been translating the Dead Sea Scrolls for years, why would modern prophets need to do this? The only point that the critics are trying to make here is that modern prophets don't translate ancient documents.		*Scholars have been translating the Dead Sea Scrolls for years, why would modern prophets need to do this? The only point that the critics are trying to make here is that modern prophets don't translate ancient documents.
	*What would be the point of attempting to translate the Anthon characters? (there is no "Anthon Manuscript") The only point ~~tthat~~ the critics are trying to make here is that modern prophets don't translate ancient documents.		*What would be the point of attempting to translate the Anthon characters? (there is no "Anthon Manuscript") The only point that the critics are trying to make here is that modern prophets don't translate ancient documents.
	\|quote=		\|quote=
	}}		}}

RogerNicholson: /* */ fix

2012-06-07T04:44:52Z

: fix

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:44, 7 June 2012
Line 111:		Line 111:
	\|quote=		\|quote=
	*Note how many items are considered "standard works" in 1855:		*Note how many items are considered "standard works" in 1855:
	<~~quote~~>		<blockquote>
	Broadside by Parley P. Pratt, Millennial Star 17. 20 (May 16, 1855) announcing the “Mormon Book Depot, and General Agency of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, for the Pacific Coast. PARLEY P. PRATT respectfully announces to the public, that he has established an Office and Book Depot in San Francisco, Cal., near the corner of Dupont and Sacramento Streets, where will be constantly on hand and for sale '''the Standard Works of said Church, among the most noted of which are the following, viz.--Book of Mormon, Doctrine and Covenants, Voice of Warning, O. Pratt’s Works, Key to the Science of Theology, Pearl of Great Price, Spencer’s Letters, Hymn Books, And a variety of Periodicals, Debates, Defences, Tracts, &c., &c.''' San Francisco, March 2, 1855.” It also indicates that he is in correspondence with LDS in foreign countries, and can provide works in French, German, Danish, Spanish, Italian, Welsh. (319). (emphasis added)		Broadside by Parley P. Pratt, Millennial Star 17. 20 (May 16, 1855) announcing the “Mormon Book Depot, and General Agency of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, for the Pacific Coast. PARLEY P. PRATT respectfully announces to the public, that he has established an Office and Book Depot in San Francisco, Cal., near the corner of Dupont and Sacramento Streets, where will be constantly on hand and for sale '''the Standard Works of said Church, among the most noted of which are the following, viz.--Book of Mormon, Doctrine and Covenants, Voice of Warning, O. Pratt’s Works, Key to the Science of Theology, Pearl of Great Price, Spencer’s Letters, Hymn Books, And a variety of Periodicals, Debates, Defences, Tracts, &c., &c.''' San Francisco, March 2, 1855.” It also indicates that he is in correspondence with LDS in foreign countries, and can provide works in French, German, Danish, Spanish, Italian, Welsh. (319). (emphasis added)
	</~~quote~~>		</blockquote>
	\|response=		\|response=
	\|link=Journal of Discourses/As doctrine and one of the "standard works" of the Church		\|link=Journal of Discourses/As doctrine and one of the "standard works" of the Church

RogerNicholson: /* */ mod

2012-06-04T06:19:00Z

: mod

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:19, 4 June 2012
Line 82:		Line 82:
	etc., etc., etc.		etc., etc., etc.
	\|think=		\|think=
			*The purpose of a prophet is not to "give answers to people for the dilemmas in which they find themselves." The purpose of prophets is to provide direction and guidance.
	\|quote=		\|quote=
	}}		}}

RogerNicholson: /* */ mod

2012-06-04T06:14:24Z

: mod

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:14, 4 June 2012
Line 38:		Line 38:
	\|claim=Why haven't the prophets that followed Joseph performed any prophetic duties as seer for the church?		\|claim=Why haven't the prophets that followed Joseph performed any prophetic duties as seer for the church?
	\|think=		\|think=
			*Because the Lord has not required them to do so.
	\|quote=		\|quote=
	}}		}}

RogerNicholson: /* */ mod

2012-06-04T06:10:48Z

: mod

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:10, 4 June 2012
Line 108:		Line 108:
	*The definition of "standard work" during the 19th-century included many publications that are not part of our present-day standard works.		*The definition of "standard work" during the 19th-century included many publications that are not part of our present-day standard works.
	\|quote=		\|quote=
			*Note how many items are considered "standard works" in 1855:
			<quote>
			Broadside by Parley P. Pratt, Millennial Star 17. 20 (May 16, 1855) announcing the “Mormon Book Depot, and General Agency of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, for the Pacific Coast. PARLEY P. PRATT respectfully announces to the public, that he has established an Office and Book Depot in San Francisco, Cal., near the corner of Dupont and Sacramento Streets, where will be constantly on hand and for sale '''the Standard Works of said Church, among the most noted of which are the following, viz.--Book of Mormon, Doctrine and Covenants, Voice of Warning, O. Pratt’s Works, Key to the Science of Theology, Pearl of Great Price, Spencer’s Letters, Hymn Books, And a variety of Periodicals, Debates, Defences, Tracts, &c., &c.''' San Francisco, March 2, 1855.” It also indicates that he is in correspondence with LDS in foreign countries, and can provide works in French, German, Danish, Spanish, Italian, Welsh. (319). (emphasis added)
			</quote>
	\|response=		\|response=
	\|link=Journal of Discourses/As doctrine and one of the "standard works" of the Church		\|link=Journal of Discourses/As doctrine and one of the "standard works" of the Church

RogerNicholson: /* */ mod

2012-06-04T06:07:35Z

: mod

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:07, 4 June 2012
Line 106:		Line 106:
	The Journal of Discourses deservedly ranks as one of the standard works of the Church,		The Journal of Discourses deservedly ranks as one of the standard works of the Church,
	\|think=		\|think=
			*The definition of "standard work" during the 19th-century included many publications that are not part of our present-day standard works.
	\|quote=		\|quote=
			\|response=
			\|link=Journal of Discourses/As doctrine and one of the "standard works" of the Church
			\|subject=Is the Journal of Discourses doctrinal? Is it one of the "standard works" of the Church?
			\|summary=Critics often use the Journal of Discourses to show both nonmembers and LDS what The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints supposedly "really believes" to be official doctrine on subjects that have been considered to be either controversial or touchy by members of the Church. A popular example often used in the anti-Mormon community is the Adam-God theory. Critics insist that LDS once regarded the Journal of Discourses as a "standard work" or similar to scripture.
	}}		}}

RogerNicholson: /* */ mod

2012-06-04T06:01:53Z

: mod

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:01, 4 June 2012
Line 46:		Line 46:
	\|think=		\|think=
	*Scholars have been translating the Dead Sea Scrolls for years, why would modern prophets need to do this? The only point that the critics are trying to make here is that modern prophets don't translate ancient documents.		*Scholars have been translating the Dead Sea Scrolls for years, why would modern prophets need to do this? The only point that the critics are trying to make here is that modern prophets don't translate ancient documents.
	*What would be the point of attempting to translate the Anthon characters? (there is no "Anthon Manuscript") The only ~~poin~~ tthat the critics are trying to make here is that modern prophets don't translate ancient documents.		*What would be the point of attempting to translate the Anthon characters? (there is no "Anthon Manuscript") The only point tthat the critics are trying to make here is that modern prophets don't translate ancient documents.
	\|quote=		\|quote=
	}}		}}

RogerNicholson: /* */ mod

2012-06-04T05:54:15Z

: mod

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:54, 4 June 2012
Line 45:		Line 45:
	\|claim=There are numerous documents that could be translated by modern prophets and provide value to Latter-day Saints, just as the other additional scriptures brought forth by Joseph have. A few immediately come to mind: The Dead Sea Scrolls...Anthon Manuscript...		\|claim=There are numerous documents that could be translated by modern prophets and provide value to Latter-day Saints, just as the other additional scriptures brought forth by Joseph have. A few immediately come to mind: The Dead Sea Scrolls...Anthon Manuscript...
	\|think=		\|think=
	*Scholars have been translating the Dead Sea Scrolls for years. The only point that the critics are trying to make here is that modern prophets don't translate ancient documents.		*Scholars have been translating the Dead Sea Scrolls for years, why would modern prophets need to do this? The only point that the critics are trying to make here is that modern prophets don't translate ancient documents.
			*What would be the point of attempting to translate the Anthon characters? (there is no "Anthon Manuscript") The only poin tthat the critics are trying to make here is that modern prophets don't translate ancient documents.
	\|quote=		\|quote=
	}}		}}