|
|
| (71 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| {{Articles FAIR copyright}} {{Articles Header 1}} {{Articles Header 2}} {{Articles Header 3}} {{Articles Header 4}} {{Articles Header 5}} {{Articles Header 6}} {{Articles Header 7}} {{Articles Header 8}} {{Articles Header 9}} {{Articles Header 10}}
| | #REDIRECT [[Theological Questions Regarding the Book of Abraham#Science]] |
| {{BofAPortal}}
| |
| {{SciencePortal}}
| |
| =={{Criticism label}}==
| |
| The Book of Abraham states that “the sun [is said] to borrow its light from Kolob through the medium of Kae-e-vanrash, which is the grand Key, or, in other words, the governing power (Abraham Fac 2,Fig 5),” while astrophysics has shown that “The Sun shines ... because of thermonuclear fusion. It does not get its light from any other star.”
| |
| | |
| {{CriticalSources}}
| |
| | |
| =={{Response label}}==
| |
| There are many scriptures or statements by the prophets that seem to have scientific implications. Unfortunately, they are never couched in modern scientific terms and their meanings are often very obscure. Some people, including members of the Church, may feel that it is foolish that some faithful saints have made attempts to interpret such things in a way that tries to harmonize them with some current view of science. Nevertheless, at least these faithful explanations have been made in good faith. For example, some saints have made attempts to harmonize the theory of evolution with the gospel. Another example is that some saints have tried to explain the Book of Mormon using current archaeology. It is true that these types of suggestions made by such faithful saints are not authoritative or binding on the Church. But it is difficult for some reasonable people to regard these theories as "foolish" merely because they are suggestions that have been made, just like any other suggestion that is made about anything else. They are genuine attempts to come to some kind of understanding, and are no more foolish than any other apologetic theory about any other subject that makes attempts at explanations to build faith. However, they must be treated with extreme caution as anything else must be on subjects that are unsettled.
| |
| | |
| However, it is definitely a foolish thing that faithless critics purposely try to interpret things that are uncertain in a way that is most at odds with current scientific thought to try to put the Church, its leaders and its scriptures in a bad light. And these explanations by critics are most often made in bad faith. The fact that critics make such interpretations is a ''straw man'' tactic, where they try to make the Book of Abraham and other scriptures to say things when there is no evidence that they actually mean such a thing.
| |
| | |
| The Book of Abraham quote cited in the criticism above has inspired both faithful attempts at explanation, as well as critical attempts, including the interpretation found on the web site where this criticism appeared. The wording of Joseph Smith’s explanation of Figure 5 in Facsimile 2 of the Book of Abraham is, in fact, very difficult to interpret. Let’s see what some of our options are.
| |
| | |
| *In the Solar System, we observe that planets and moons that do not give off their own light reflect the light that they receive from the Sun. However, we note that Jupiter itself, being very large, and having other sources of energy internally gives off more energy than it receives from the Sun in the form of heat and so forth ([http://nineplanets.org/jupiter.html]). But this fact still does not stop it from being true that Jupiter does indeed receive visible light from the Sun. Jupiter, earth, and the other planets of the Solar System do indeed receive light from other stars, even though we receive ''most'' of our light from the Sun. Now, if we extrapolate further from these facts that we have just noted, it is also true that the Sun receives light from other stars, just like we do on earth, because they are visible to us in the night sky. But that light is miniscule compared to the light that the Sun puts out on its own power from its own internal sources (just as in the case of Jupiter). So, just because a celestial orb has its own power source internally, it ''still does borrow light from other celestial orbs''. So, regardless of the fact that the light the Sun receives from other stars is miniscule, ''it is still true that it does receive such light''. The Book of Abraham may be referring only to the light that is reflected or borrowed, and is simply not focusing on the light or energy that is internally generated. This answer may not be convincing to critics, but it is still technically true, nevertheless.
| |
| | |
| *Another suggestion is this: To “borrow” means to receive with the intention of returning, especially said of a material object or substance. It may also mean to take and adopt as one’s own, especially said of abstractions or ideas, as in “the composer borrowed his harmonic structure from Bach’s Fugue in D Major.” So what does it mean for the sun to “borrow” its light from Kolob? Is light a material or an abstraction? Does the Sun intend to repay the light it borrowed?
| |
| | |
| *What, in fact, is meant by 'light' in this context? Doctrine & Covenants 88:7–13, in wording strongly reminiscent of our Book of Abraham quote, states “7 ...this is the light of Christ. As also he is in the sun, and the light of the sun, and the power thereof by which it was made. 8 As also he is in the moon, and is the light of the moon, and the power thereof by which it was made; 9 As also the light of the stars, and the power thereof by which they were made; 10 And the earth also, and the power thereof, even the earth upon which you stand. 11 <b>And the light which shineth, which giveth you light</b>, is through him who enlighteneth your eyes, which <b>is the same light that quickeneth your understandings</b>; 12 Which light proceedeth forth from the presence of God to fill the immensity of space — 13 <b>The light which is in all things, which giveth life to all things, which is the law by which all things are governed</b>, even the power of God who sitteth upon his throne, who is in the bosom of eternity, who is in the midst of all things (emphasis added).” These verses are clearly NOT talking about electromagnetic radiation. Does anyone have a convincing explanation of what they ARE talking about?
| |
| | |
| *A “medium” can mean a material through which some signal propagates or a means or channel through which something is achieved. What does it mean here? Does it refer to a material or a means?
| |
| | |
| *What is Kae-e-vanrash? The Book of Abraham says that it is a “grand Key,” or “governing power.” What does that mean? Is Kae-e-vanrash a term for nuclear reactions, gravitation, cosmic rays? Or is it a more spiritual medium such as priesthood or faith, or an organizational structure, or a means used for administrative communications?
| |
| | |
| And, finally, what are we to understand about the nature of Book of Abraham astronomy? Is it a revelation from God to Abraham explaining the structure of the universe as it would be seen by the astronomers of our day? That is the position of a number of scholars such as Michael Rhodes and J. Ward Moody in the chapter entitled "Astronomy and the Creation in the Book of Abraham," Chapter 2 in the book Astronomy, Papyrus and Covenant, the third volume in the series ''Studies in the Book of Abraham''.
| |
| | |
| Others have another theory that the Book of Abraham represents an ancient "Geocentric" cosmology. John Gee is one of these scholars. Gee, as well as William J. Hamblin and Daniel C. Peterson published their views on this as well in the same book in Chapter 1, entitled "'And I Saw The Stars', The Book of Abraham and Ancient Geocentric Astronomy. We remember that “The Lord said unto me: Abraham, I show these things unto thee before ye go into Egypt, that ye may declare all these words.” {{scripture||Abraham|3|15}}, so that, as John Gee has suggested ([http://www.fairlds.org/FAIR_Conferences/2009_The_Larger_Issue.html "The Larger Issue"]), this is simply the teaching that would be easiest for the Egyptians to understand — one that would teach them that Elohim, who dwells near Kolob, rules over than the sun-god, Amen-Re?
| |
| | |
| =={{Conclusion label}}==
| |
| Until someone can make a convincing case that their interpretation of these things is the only reasonable one, any faith-promoting proof from Abraham’s astronomy is a flimsy house of cards and any faith-destroying attack on some straw-man interpretation is laughable. Among the laughable interpretations is the unjustified suggestion that Abraham taught that the photons leaving the surface of the sun originally came from Kolob.
| |
| | |
| =={{Endnotes label}}==
| |
| ''None''
| |
| | |
| =={{Further reading label}}==
| |
| | |
| ===FAIR Wiki===
| |
| {{ScienceWiki}}
| |
| {{BookofAbrahamWiki}}
| |
| | |
| ===FAIR Wiki===
| |
| {{ScienceFAIR}}
| |
| | |
| ===On-line articles===
| |
| * {{Book:Gee Hauglid:Astronomy, Papyrus, and Covenant|pages=Chapter 1|author=John Gee, William J. Hamblin, and Daniel Peterson|article=And I Saw The Stars--The Book of Abraham and Ancient Geocentric Astronomy}} {{link|url=http://maxwellinstitute.byu.edu/publications/books/?bookid=40&chapid=161}}
| |
| * {{Book:Gee Hauglid:Astronomy, Papyrus, and Covenant|pages=Chapter 2|author=J. Ward Moody and Michael D. Rhodes|article=Astronomy and the Creation in the Book of Abraham}} {{link|url=http://maxwellinstitute.byu.edu/publications/books/?bookid=40&chapid=162}}
| |
| {{ScienceArticles}}
| |
| | |
| ===Print works===
| |
| {{SciencePrint}}
| |
| {{Articles Footer 1}} {{Articles Footer 2}} {{Articles Footer 3}} {{Articles Footer 4}} {{Articles Footer 5}} {{Articles Footer 6}} {{Articles Footer 7}} {{Articles Footer 8}} {{Articles Footer 9}} {{Articles Footer 10}}
| |
| | |
| [[fr:Book of Abraham/Astronomy/Kolob-Sun]]
| |
