Array

Detailed response to CES Letter, Testimony and Spiritual Witness: Difference between revisions

m (→‎top: Bot replace {{FairMormon}} with {{Main Page}} and remove extra lines around {{Header}})
 
(211 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Articles FAIR copyright}} {{Articles Header 1}} {{Articles Header 2}} {{Articles Header 3}} {{Articles Header 4}} {{Articles Header 5}} {{Articles Header 6}} {{Articles Header 7}} {{Articles Header 8}} {{Articles Header 9}} {{Articles Header 10}}
{{Main Page}}
__NOTOC__
{{H1
{{FAIRAnalysisHeader
|L=Detailed response to CES Letter, Testimony and Spiritual Witness
|title=[[../|Letter to a CES Director]]
|H=Detailed response to CES Letter, Testimony and Spiritual Witness
|author=
|S=
|noauthor=
|L1=
|section=Testimony & Spiritual Witness Concerns & Questions
|T=[[../|Letter to a CES Director]]
|previous=[[../Kinderhook Plates and Translator & Seer Claims Concerns & Questions|Kinderhook Plates and Translator/Seer Claims Concerns & Questions]]
|A=Jeremy Runnells
|next=[[../Priesthood Restoration Concerns & Questions|Priesthood Restoration Concerns & Questions]]
|<=[[../Kinderhook Plates and Translator & Seer Claims Concerns & Questions|Kinderhook Plates and Translator/Seer Claims Concerns & Questions]]
|notes=
|>=[[../Priesthood Restoration Concerns & Questions|Priesthood Restoration Concerns & Questions]]
}}
}}
 
[[File:Chart CES Letter testimony.png|center|frame]]
==A FAIR Analysis of the online document ''Letter to a CES Director'' section "Testimony & Spiritual Witness Concerns & Questions"==
<onlyinclude>
 
{{H2
{{Epigraph|And they said one to another, Did not our heart burn within us, while he talked with us by the way, and while he opened to us the scriptures? ({{s||Luke|24|32}})
|L=Criticism of Mormonism/Online documents/Letter to a CES Director/Testimony & Spiritual Witness Concerns & Questions
|H=Response to section "Testimony/Spiritual Witness Concerns & Questions"
|S=The author asks the question, "Why is this Spirit so unreliable and inconsistent?  How can I trust such an inconsistent and contradictory Source for knowing that Mormonism is worth betting my life, time, money, heart, mind, and obedience to?" This section touches on themes of epistemology.
|L1=Response to claim: "Every major religion has members who claim the same thing: God or God’s spirit bore witness to them"
|D1=Letter to a CES Director: Why I Lost My Testimony, April 2013
|L2= Response to claim: "Let's play a game! Try to match Atheism and these 8 religions to the following 21 quotes."
|D2=Debunking FAIR's Debunking, June 2014
|L3=Response to claim: "it would likewise be arrogant of a Latter-day Saint to deny their spiritual experiences and testimonies of the truthfulness of their own religion"
|D3=Letter to a CES Director: Why I Lost My Testimony, April 2013
|D4=Letter to a CES Director: Why I Lost My Testimony, April 2013
|L4=Response to claim: "If God’s method to revealing truth is through feelings, it’s a pretty ineffective method"
|D4=Letter to a CES Director: Why I Lost My Testimony, April 2013
|L5=Response to claim: "Joseph Smith received a revelation, through the peep stone in his hat, to send Hiram Page and Oliver Cowdery to Toronto, Canada for the sole purpose of selling the copyright of the Book of Mormon"
|D5=Letter to a CES Director: Why I Lost My Testimony, April 2013
|L6=Response to claim: "I saw a testimony as more than just spiritual experiences and feelings. I saw that we had evidence and logic on our side based on the correlated narrative I was fed by the Church about its origins."
|D6=Letter to a CES Director: Why I Lost My Testimony, April 2013
|L7=Response to claim: "What about the members who felt the Spirit from Dunn’s fabricated and false stories?"
|D7=Letter to a CES Director: Why I Lost My Testimony, April 2013
|L8=Response to claim: "a testimony is to be found in the bearing of it"
|D8=Letter to a CES Director: Why I Lost My Testimony, April 2013
|L9=Response to claim: "how can they be sure of the reliability of this same exact process in telling them that Mormonism is true?"
|D9=Letter to a CES Director: Why I Lost My Testimony, April 2013
|L10=Response to claim: "Even prophets are often wrong."
|D10=Debunking FAIR's Debunking, June 2014
|L11=Response to claim: "I felt the Spirit watching 'Saving Private Ryan' and the 'Schindler’s List'. Both R-rated and horribly violent movies. I also felt the Spirit watching 'Forrest Gump' and the 'Lion King'."
|D11=Letter to a CES Director: Why I Lost My Testimony, April 2013
|L12=Response to claim: "Why did I feel the Spirit as I listened to the stories of apostates sharing how they discovered for themselves that Mormonism is not true?"
|D12=Letter to a CES Director: Why I Lost My Testimony, April 2013
|L13= Response to claim: "This thought-provoking video raises some profound questions and challenges to the Latter-day Saint concept of "testimony" and receiving a witness from the Holy Ghost..."
|D13=Letter to a CES Director: Why I Lost My Testimony, April 2013
}}
}}
{{Epigraph|My heart was hot within me, while I was musing the fire burned: then spake I with my tongue. ({{s||Psalms|39|3}})
</onlyinclude>
{{Back to top}}
==Response to claim: "Every major religion has members who claim the same thing:  God or God’s spirit bore witness to them"==
{{IndexClaimItemShort
|title=Letter to a CES Director (April 2013 revision)
|claim=Every major religion has members who claim the same thing: God or God’s spirit bore witness to them that their religion, prophet/pope/leaders, book(s), and teachings are true.
|source=[[Criticism of Mormonism/Books/An Insider's View of Mormon Origins/Index/Chapter 4#131|Grant Palmer, ''An Insider's View of Mormon Origins'', 131]].
|provenance={{CriticalWork:Palmer:Insider|pages=131}}
}}
}}
{{Epigraph|What does a “burning in the bosom” mean? Does it need to be a feeling of caloric heat, like the burning produced by combustion? If that is the meaning, I have never had a burning in the bosom. Surely, the word “burning” in this scripture signifies a feeling of comfort and serenity. That is the witness many receive. That is the way revelation works.<br>&mdash;{{Ensign1|author=Dallin H. Oaks|article=Teaching and Learning by the Spirit|date=March 1997|start=14}}
{{misinformation|This is not a characteristic of "every major religion". Latter-day Saints have a theology that can reconcile the reports of spiritual experiences of people among other religions. Latter-day Saints believe that truth can be found in every religion and that God can work through these religions to bring individuals unto him gradually.
|L=Criticism of Mormonism/Online documents/Letter to a CES Director/Testimony & Spiritual Witness Concerns & Questions
}}
}}
{{parabreak}}
{{composition|In this case the author asserts that because Mormonism has members who claim that God or God's spirit bore witness to them, that all religions have members who claim that God or God's spirit bore witness to them.}}
==Quick Navigation==
*[[Criticism of Mormonism/Online documents/Letter to a CES Director/Testimony & Spiritual Witness Concerns & Questions#"Every major religion has members who claim the same thing:  God or God’s spirit bore witness to them"|Response to section: "Every major religion has members who claim the same thing:  God or God’s spirit bore witness to them"]] {{InProgress}}
*[[Criticism of Mormonism/Online documents/Letter to a CES Director/Testimony & Spiritual Witness Concerns & Questions#"it would likewise be arrogant of a Latter-day Saint to deny their spiritual experiences and testimonies of the truthfulness of their own religion"|Response to section: "it would likewise be arrogant of a Latter-day Saint to deny their spiritual experiences and testimonies of the truthfulness of their own religion"]] {{InProgress}}
*[[Criticism of Mormonism/Online documents/Letter to a CES Director/Testimony & Spiritual Witness Concerns & Questions#"If God’s method to revealing truth is through feelings, it’s a pretty ineffective method"|Response to section: "If God’s method to revealing truth is through feelings, it’s a pretty ineffective method"]]
*[[Criticism of Mormonism/Online documents/Letter to a CES Director/Testimony & Spiritual Witness Concerns & Questions#"Joseph Smith received a revelation, through the peep stone in his hat, to send Hiram Page and Oliver Cowdery to Toronto, Canada for the sole purpose of selling the copyright of the Book of Mormon"|Response to section: "Joseph Smith received a revelation, through the peep stone in his hat, to send Hiram Page and Oliver Cowdery to Toronto, Canada for the sole purpose of selling the copyright of the Book of Mormon"]]
*[[Criticism of Mormonism/Online documents/Letter to a CES Director/Testimony & Spiritual Witness Concerns & Questions#"I saw a testimony as more than just spiritual experiences and feelings.  I saw that we had evidence and logic on our side based on the correlated narrative I was fed by the Church about its origins."|Response to section: "I saw a testimony as more than just spiritual experiences and feelings. I saw that we had evidence and logic on our side based on the correlated narrative I was fed by the Church about its origins."]] {{InProgress}}
*[[Criticism of Mormonism/Online documents/Letter to a CES Director/Testimony & Spiritual Witness Concerns & Questions#Paul H. Dunn|Response to section: Paul H. Dunn]]
*[[Criticism of Mormonism/Online documents/Letter to a CES Director/Testimony & Spiritual Witness Concerns & Questions#"a testimony is to be found in the bearing of it"|Response to section: "a testimony is to be found in the bearing of it"]]
*[[Criticism of Mormonism/Online documents/Letter to a CES Director/Testimony & Spiritual Witness Concerns & Questions#"how can they be sure of the reliability of this same exact process in telling them that Mormonism is true?"|Response to section: "how can they be sure of the reliability of this same exact process in telling them that Mormonism is true?"]]
*[[Criticism of Mormonism/Online documents/Letter to a CES Director/Testimony & Spiritual Witness Concerns & Questions#"I felt the Spirit watching 'Saving Private Ryan' and the 'Schindler’s List'.  Both R-rated and horribly violent movies.  I also felt the Spirit watching 'Forrest Gump' and the 'Lion King'."|Response to section: "I felt the Spirit watching 'Saving Private Ryan' and the 'Schindler’s List'.  Both R-rated and horribly violent movies.  I also felt the Spirit watching 'Forrest Gump' and the 'Lion King'."]] {{InProgress}}
*[[Criticism of Mormonism/Online documents/Letter to a CES Director/Testimony & Spiritual Witness Concerns & Questions#"Why did I feel the Spirit as I listened to the stories of apostates sharing how they discovered for themselves that Mormonism is not true?"|Response to section: "Why did I feel the Spirit as I listened to the stories of apostates sharing how they discovered for themselves that Mormonism is not true?"]] {{InProgress}}


==Response Section==


===="If God’s method to revealing truth is through feelings, it’s a pretty ineffective method"====
'''Longer response(s) to criticism:'''
{{CESLetterItem
*[[Question: Do all other religions confirm their beliefs through spiritual witness?]]
|claim=The author comments, "If God’s method to revealing truth is through feelings, it’s a pretty ineffective method," "how can they be sure of the reliability of this same exact process in telling them that Mormonism is true?" and "Why did I feel the Spirit as I listened to the stories of apostates sharing how they discovered for themselves that Mormonism is not true?"
*[[Question: How can Latter-day Saints reconcile having other people receive spiritual experiences that motivate them to believe in and become part of other religions?]]
|answer=
*[[Preach My Gospel: "many other nations and cultures have been blessed by those who were given that portion that God 'seeth fit that they should have'"]]
*Dr. Wendy Ulrich, a licensed psychologist with over 25 years of experience, addresses this issue:
{{Back to top}}
<blockquote>
'''How do we decide what to believe in religious matters?'''
<br><br>
People from many religious traditions have “spiritual” experiences–feelings, insights, premonitions, and encounters which they are left to their own conclusions to decipher. It is not unusual for people to conclude from such experiences that God is their God, that He is nearby, or that something associated with that experience is God’s will. Often in the Church we encourage people to look for such feelings and experiences as evidence of God’s hand, or of the truthfulness of the Church’s message. Yet people from many religious backgrounds can have such experiences. How do the goosebumps and tearfulness I experience when someone speaks in a testimony meeting differ from the goosebumps and tearfulness I experience when the 4:00 parade begins at Disneyland? Critics may conclude that there is no real difference, that feelings are not trustworthy or related to the spirit, and that Church members are being misled by missionaries who teach them that such experiences are the Holy Ghost testifying to them of truth. I have seen this argument used to discredit “spiritual” experiences as nothing more than subjectively produced emotions with no supernatural significance. In many cases I might agree. Because I feel certain emotions in response to a film–even a Church film–may say more about the credibility of the actors’ performance or the director’s talent than the presence of God or the historical accuracy of the message, for example.
<br><br>
Fortunately, we are not left with emotion alone to discern God’s hand in our lives. Reason, experience, counsel from others, and other forms of revelation may all assist us. In fact, I notice that emotion plays into only some of my spiritual experiences, and often only in a secondary way. More often the spiritual promptings and confirmations I receive come very quietly as something simply occurs to me with a kind of rightness that has no real emotion attached to it at all. Other times my emotions have been running high, but the clear voice of the Spirit is utterly calm and outside of the range of my thoughts or experience. Some of my clearest spiritual experiences have come as a question or statement in my mind that completely surprised me, or that took me a moment to take in and understand. Others have come as a pure love beyond my previous capacity to imagine. I have received impressions to do something that, when acted on, produced an amazing but utterly unpredictable result that was a clear answer to a prayer. And at least a few times God has simply told me something which was later confirmed but that I had no way of knowing by any other means. I expect that people from many religious backgrounds may have such experiences, and I am comfortable imagining God in many of them, but they are not easily explained away as a self-produced warm feeling. I am comfortable with being tentative about what I conclude from such experiences beyond the experience itself.
<br><br>
What is also striking is how often I do NOT get any spiritual feelings or impressions even when it would be most convenient to my faith and comfort if I could. What I’d really like to know is not so much why I have faith-promoting experiences at predictable times as why I don’t have faith-promoting experiences at times when it would really help if I did. I might explain away a warm feeling as wishful thinking rather than the Spirit if it generally comes around at will. But why did I go for years without any reduction in my substantial feelings of betrayal and doubt about a particular aspect of Church history even though I was desperately pleading with God for answers? And why, when I had long since decided no answer that would satisfy me was forthcoming did I receive an answer that not only completely satisfied, but humbled, awed, and instructed me in four simple words spoken through the Spirit to my heart? I would agree that we must be careful about the conclusions we jump to when we feel something sweet or good, but how do I explain the remark of a young Chinese investigator who asked the missionaries teaching her, “Why do I feel cold every time I read the Book of Mormon? Every time I even touch this book, I feel cold, and I don’t understand that.” I promise you that no missionary had taught this girl to expect a cold feeling in association with the Book of Mormon. This is not part of our language of the Spirit at all. It was only with patient listening that they could discern that this cold feeling she was struggling to describe in English was not negative in any way for her, but rather the feeling we might describe as goosebumps, a concept they had never discussed and for which they had no mutual vocabulary. So how do we decide what to believe? No simple formula exists that easily applies to all situations, but there is a language of the Spirit that we learn through experience, practice, and attention, and that uses both feelings and reason to communicate.
<br><br>
&mdash;Wendy Ulrich, Ph.D., "'Believest thou…?': Faith, Cognitive Dissonance, and the Psychology of Religious Experience," 2005 FAIR Conference. {{link|url=http://www.fairlds.org/fair-conferences/2005-fair-conference/2005-believest-thou-faith-cognitive-dissonance-and-the-psychology-of-religious-experience}}
</blockquote>
|link=
|subject=
|summary=
}}


===="Joseph Smith received a revelation, through the peep stone in his hat, to send Hiram Page and Oliver Cowdery to Toronto, Canada for the sole purpose of selling the copyright of the Book of Mormon"====
==Response to claim: "Let's play a game! Try to match Atheism and these 8 religions to the following 21 quotes."==
{{CESLetterItem
{{IndexClaimItemShort
|claim=The author states, "Joseph Smith received a revelation, through the peep stone in his hat, to send Hiram Page and Oliver Cowdery to Toronto, Canada for the sole purpose of selling the copyright of the Book of Mormon. . . . The mission failed and the prophet was asked why his revelation was wrong.Joseph decided to inquire of the Lord regarding the question.  The following is a quote from Book of Mormon witness David Whitmer’s testimony:“…and behold the following revelation came through the stone: ‘Some revelations are of God; and some revelations are of man: and some revelations are of the devil.’  So we see that the revelation to go to Toronto and sell the copy-right was not of God, but was of the devil or of the heart of man.” – David Whitmer, An Address to All Believers in Christ, p.3. How are we supposed to know what revelations are from God, from the devil, or from the heart of man if even the Prophet Joseph Smith couldn’t tell?  What kind of a god and method is this if Heavenly Father allows Satan to interfere with our direct line of communication to Him?
|title=Debunking FAIR's Debunking, June 2014
|answer=
|claim=Let’s play a game! Try to match Atheism and these 8 religions to the following 21 quotes. The answer key is below the last quote:
*Joseph Smith had been told there were people in Canada willing to buy the copyrights to useful books.  Due to the dire financial position of the Church, he decided this could be an opportunity to relieve some of the financial pressure associated with publishing the Book of Mormon.  Four men went to Canada.  Before leaving, Joseph Smith received a [[Book of Mormon/Attempt to sell copyright/Revelation|revelation]] directing them to go to Kingston, Canada, with some conditions placed upon their success.
*Atheist
<blockquote>
*Buddhist
...it Pleaseth me that Oliver Cowderey Joseph Knight Hyram Page<del>e</del> & Josiah Stowel shall do my work in this thing yea even in securing the <ins>Copy</ins>right & they shall do it with an eye single to my Glory that it may be the means of bringing souls unto me Salvation through mine only Be{<del>t</del>\gotten} Behold I am God I have spoken it <del>& it is expedient in me</del> Wherefor I say unto you that ye shall go <del>to Kingston</del> seeking me continually through mine only Be{t\gotten} & if ye do this ye shall have my spirit to go with you & ye shall have an addition of all things which is expedient in me. <ins>amen</ins> & I grant unto my servent a privelige that he may sell <ins>a copyright</ins> through you speaking after the manner of men for the four Provinces if the People harden not their hearts against the enticeings of my spirit & my word for Behold it lieth in themselves to their condemnation <del>&</del>{<del>◊</del>\or} th{<del>er</del>\eir} salvation. (''Revelation Book 1'', p. 15 {{link|url=http://josephsmithpapers.org/paperSummary/revelation-book-1?dm=image-and-text&zm=zoom-inner&tm=expanded&p=15&s=undefined&sm=none}})
*Catholic
</blockquote>
*Hindu
*The text of the revelation was published in the ''The Joseph Smith Papers: The Revelations and Translations Series.'' According to Marlin K. Jensen, Church Historian and Recorder,
*Islam
<blockquote>
*Mormon
Another interesting development from work on the Revelations and Translations Series has been the identification of a previously unpublished revelation on securing a copyright for the Book of Mormon in Canada. David Whitmer, after he left the Church, recalled that the revelation promised success in selling the copyright, but upon return of the men charged with the duty, Joseph Smith and others were disappointed by what seemed like failure. Historians have relied upon statements of David Whitmer, Hiram Page, and William McLellin for decades but have not had the actual text of the revelation. Revelation Book 1 will provide that.
*New Age
<br><br>
*Protestant
Although we still do not know the whole story, particularly Joseph Smith’s own view of the situation, we do know that calling the divine communication a “failed revelation” is not warranted. The Lord’s directive clearly conditions the successful sale of the copyright on the worthiness of those seeking to make the sale as well as on the spiritual receptivity of the potential purchasers. {{ref|jensen1}}
*Universal Unitarian
</blockquote>
*Hiram Page, who was one of the individuals sent to Canada, laid out the event in a letter in 1848.{{ref|page.1848}} Page wrote that the revelation Joseph Smith received conditioned success upon whether those individuals in Canada capable of buying the Book of Mormon copyright would have their hearts softened.  When unable to sell the copyright, the four men returned to Palmyra.  Hiram Page stated he for the first time understood how some revelations given to people were not necessarily for their direct benefit&mdash;in fact, Hiram Page believed that the revelation was actually ''fulfilled''.
}}
[[File:Revelation book 1 p. 15 1.jpg|800 px]]


====Paul H. Dunn====
“I felt a burning in my heart, and a great burden seemed to have left me.
{{CESLetterItem
|claim=The author states, "Dunn was a General Authority of the Church for many years.  He was a very popular speaker who told incredible faith-promoting war and baseball stories.  Many times Dunn shared these stories in the presence of the prophet, apostles, and seventies.  Stories like how God protected him as enemy machine-gun bullets ripped away his clothing, gear, and helmet without ever touching his skin and how he was preserved by the Lord.  Members of the Church shared how they really felt the Spirit as they listened to Dunn’s testimony and stories.Unfortunately, Dunn was later caught lying about all his war and baseball stories and was forced to apologize to the members.  He became the first General Authority to gain “emeritus” status and was removed from public Church life.What about the members who felt the Spirit from Dunn’s fabricated and false stories?  What does this say about the Spirit and what the Spirit really is?"
|answer=
*The author is correct that simply receiving a warm feeling about a speech or article is not enough to call it revelation or a confirmation of the spirit. One would need to properly study the issue, get an idea of what is correct, then ask for confirmation.  The witness has to be consistent with other revelation and can be compared with others witness of similar events. In the case of Elder Dunn's stories, we felt good when we heard them. Boyd Packer pointed out that feelings and “spiritual” events can come from three sources:  1) your own feelings, 2) Satan, or 3) the Holy Ghost.  You must use methods to properly confirm which is occurring in a particular event.
*Regarding Elder Dunn's stories: he was human, just like the rest of us. He can speak for himself on this issue: [http://www.deseretnews.com/article/190407/ELDER-DUNN-OFFERS-APOLOGY-FOR-ERRORS-ADMITS-CENSURE.html?pg=all "Elder Dunn Offers Apology for Errors, Admits Censure"], Deseret News, Oct. 27 1991.
<blockquote>
In an open letter to LDS Church members, Elder Paul H. Dunn apologized Saturday for not having "always been accurate" in telling his popular war and baseball stories, and he acknowledged being disciplined for it by church authorities.
<br><br>
<br><br>
Elder Dunn, an emeritus member of the First Quorum of Seventy of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, asked the church's First Presidency and Council of the Twelve for the opportunity to send an open letter to church members. The letter was published in Saturday's issue of the Church News."I confess that I have not always been accurate in my public talks and writings," Elder Dunn wrote. "Furthermore, I have indulged in other activities inconsistent with the high and sacred office which I have held.
“But what can I say? How can I describe an experience so profound and so beautiful? Shall I say that it was the most blessed experience of my life? Shall I say that [God] touched my heart and gave me a feeling of peace I had not known before? Shall I describe the tears that flowed freely from my eyes, affirming my...faith, as I...beg[ed] [God's] blessings for myself and for those I love?”
<br><br>
<br><br>
"For all of these I feel a deep sense of remorse, and ask forgiveness of any whom I may have offended."
“The sense I had of divine things, would often of a sudden kindle up, as it were, a sweet burning in my heart; an ardor of soul, that I know not how to express.
<br><br>
<br><br>
A former Army private and minor-league baseball player, Elder Dunn told riveting accounts of his war and baseball experiences that made him one of the most popular speakers in the church. According to the Associated Press, he was author or co-author of 28 books and is featured on 23 inspirational tapes. He served in the presidency of the First Quorum of the Seventy from 1976 to 1980.
“As I read these books in a...bookstore,...I felt a burning in my heart that I should come and investigate.
<br><br>
<br><br>
In 1989, Elder Dunn was placed on emeritus status for "reasons of age and health," the church said. In February 1991, the Arizona Republic reported that Elder Dunn had made up or combined elements of many of his war and baseball stories.
“[Even as a child], [w]ithout understanding much about the complex [doctrine]...he was attracted to [church]. There he often felt a strong feeling of peace flowing through his body.
<br><br>
<br><br>
In his open letter, Elder Dunn, 67, said general authorities of the church have conducted in-depth investigations of charges that he had engaged in activities unbecoming of a church member.
“I was praying...when I felt a burning shaft of...love come through my head and into my heart.”
<br><br>
<br><br>
"They have weighed the evidence," he said. "They have censured me and placed a heavy penalty upon me.
“I truly [sic] wanted to know [the truth]. After a few weeks, I stumbled onto [texts] which… answered my questions in a way that I had not heard of before. I read everything...and I even tried the experiment of asking [God] for...his divine love. After about 6 weeks, I felt a burning in my chest and a sensation that was unlike anything I had ever felt. It was pure happiness and peace. I knew then that [God] had sent His love to me.
<br><br>
<br><br>
"I accept their censure and the imposed penalty, and pledge to conduct my life in such a way as to merit their confidence and full fellowship."
“A feeling of peace and certitude would tell me when I had found the answers and often after people would help me by pointing in the right direction.
<br><br>
<br><br>
Church spokesman Don LeFevre said Saturday that the nature of the penalty is "an internal matter, and we don't discuss such matters" publicly.
“We gave up a lot of things. What did I get in return? I received a feeling of peace, hope and security. I no longer lay awake at night worrying. I stopped cussing. I became much more honest in all aspects of my life. [God] has changed my heart and my life. My husband’s heart is changing also. We pray all the time and really feel [God’s] presence in our marriage. My perspective has changed. My view of life has changed about what is truly important.
<br><br>
<br><br>
Elder Dunn has an unlisted phone number and could not be reached for comment. He concluded his letter by pleading for the understanding of church members and assured them of his "determination so to live as to bring added respect to the cause I deeply love, and honor to the Lord who is my Redeemer."
“Many women described a feeling of euphoria after they committed to following [God]...One woman described a feeling of peace; she said: ‘It is like you are born again and you can start all over again, free from sin.’”
</blockquote>
}}
 
===="a testimony is to be found in the bearing of it"====
{{CESLetterItem
|claim=The author quotes Elder Boyd K. Packer: "How can I bear testimony until I get one? How can I testify that God lives, that Jesus is the Christ, and that the gospel is true? If I do not have such a testimony, would that not be dishonest?’  Oh, if I could teach you this one principle: a testimony is to be found in the bearing of it!”
– Boyd K. Packer, The Quest for Spiritual Knowledge.<br><br> The author concludes, "How is this honest?  How is this ethical?  What kind of advice are these Apostles giving when they’re telling you that if you don’t have a testimony, bear one anyway?  How is this not lying?  There’s a difference between saying you know something and you believe something. What about members and investigators who are on the other side listening to your 'testimony'?  How are they supposed to know whether you actually do have a testimony of Mormonism or if you’re just following Packer and Oaks’ advice and you’re lying your way into one?"
|answer=
*Elder Packer is talking about having ''faith''. When one exercises faith, results follow which strengthen that faith, but one has to take that first "leap of faith." One does not take a "leap of faith," unless they already have a seed of faith to begin with. Elder Packer is not suggesting that you should be "lying your way into" having a testimony. Attempting to "lie" your way into having a testimony would be ineffective: your testimony would not grow, and you would become increasingly frustrated.
*Elder Packer makes this clear:
<blockquote>
It is not unusual to have a missionary say, “How can I bear testimony until I get one? How can I testify that God lives, that Jesus is the Christ, and that the gospel is true? If I do not have such a testimony, would that not be dishonest?”
<br><br>
<br><br>
Oh, if I could teach you this one principle: a testimony is to be found in the bearing of it!
“A feeling of peace seemed to flow into me with a sense of togetherness...I felt very peaceful from inside and also felt [warmth]...”
<br><br>
<br><br>
<span style="color:blue">Somewhere in your quest for spiritual knowledge, there is that “leap of faith,” as the philosophers call it. It is the moment when you have gone to the edge of the light and stepped into the darkness to discover that the way is lighted ahead for just a footstep or two. “The spirit of man is,as the scripture says, indeed “the candle of the Lord” (Proverbs 20:27).
“I felt a burning sensation in my heart.”
<br><br>
<br><br>
It is one thing to receive a witness from what you have read or what another has said; and that is a necessary beginning. It is quite another to have the Spirit confirm to you in your bosom that what you have testified is true. Can you not see that it will be supplied as you share it? As you give that which you have, there is a replacement, with increase!
“That inner light, that we all have or had at some time in our existence, was nearly burnt out for me. But in the [church]...I found a feeling of peace, inner solitude and quietness that I’d also found in reading the [text] and pondering over its meaning and trying to practice what it tells us.
<br><br>
<br><br>
To speak out is the test of your faith.</span>
“For the first time I not only felt accountable for my past sins but I had to fight back tears. I knew that I had let down [God] [and] my family...However, I also knew I was forgiven! [It] gave me a feeling of peace that I have never felt it in my whole life. I felt like I had a huge weight lifted off of me and that I was finally home and free...I felt like a new person.”
</blockquote>
}}
 
===="how can they be sure of the reliability of this same exact process in telling them that Mormonism is true?"====
{{CESLetterItem
|claim=The author states, "if individuals can be so convinced that they’re being led by the Spirit but yet be so wrong about what the Spirit tells them, how can they be sure of the reliability of this same exact process in telling them that Mormonism is true?"
|answer=
*We are taught that feelings alone are not enough, and that we should confirm them. From ''Preach My Gospel'' {{link|url=http://www.lds.org/manual/preach-my-gospel-a-guide-to-missionary-service/how-do-i-recognize-and-understand-the-spirit?lang=eng}}
<blockquote>
'''A Word of Caution'''
<br><br>
<br><br>
As you pray for inspiration, you should also confirm your feelings. For example, compare your decisions with the scriptures and the teachings of the living prophets. Be certain that the feelings are consistent with the assignment you have; for example, you will not receive revelation to tell a local bishop how he should perform in his calling. Discuss your decisions and conclusions with your companion, your district leader, or your mission president when appropriate.
“Every time I am there [at the church building], a feeling of peace overcomes me.
<br><br>
<br><br>
President Howard W. Hunter offered this counsel: “Let me offer a word of caution. … I think if we are not careful … , we may begin to try to counterfeit the true influence of the Spirit of the Lord by unworthy and manipulative means. I get concerned when it appears that strong emotion or free-flowing tears are equated with the presence of the Spirit. Certainly the Spirit of the Lord can bring strong emotional feelings, including tears, but that outward manifestation ought not to be confused with the presence of the Spirit itself” (The Teachings of Howard W. Hunter, 184). The Spirit of the Lord always edifies.
“Every time I was with the [church members], I felt this warm feeling, a feeling of peace and for the first time in my life since my church-going days, I wanted to follow [God]...
<br><br>
<br><br>
Revelation and spiritual experiences are sacred. They should be kept private and discussed only in appropriate situations. As a missionary, you may be more aware of spiritual experiences than you have been earlier in your life. Resist the temptation to talk freely about these experiences.
“About 10 years ago, when Jenny and I decided to start a family, we began looking for a spiritual community for our kids. During my first service at [the church]...I was hooked. I recall the feeling of peace that I felt when I was attending [services].
<br><br>
<br><br>
President Boyd K. Packer counseled: “I have learned that strong, impressive spiritual experiences do not come to us very frequently. And when they do, they are generally for our own edification, instruction, or correction. Unless we are called by proper authority to do so, they do not position us to counsel or to correct others.
“The power of [God] came into me then. I had this warm and overwhelming feeling of peace and security. It’s hard to explain. I had to...stop myself from falling backward.”
<br><br>
<br><br>
“I have come to believe also that it is not wise to continually talk of unusual spiritual experiences. They are to be guarded with care and shared only when the Spirit itself prompts you to use them to the blessing of others” (Ensign, Jan. 1983, 53).
“[The religious leader] looked into my eyes deeply for a moment, and I experienced a feeling of peace and love unlike anything I had ever experienced before.
<br><br>
<br><br>
“If worthy, we are entitled to receive revelations for ourselves, parents for their children, and members of the Church in their callings. But the right of revelation for others does not extend beyond our own stewardship.”
“[After praying,] [i]mmediately I was flooded with a deep feeling of peace, comfort, and hope.”
<br><br>
<br><br>
–President James E. Faust
“I recently spent an afternoon on the northwestern shore of the Sea of Galilee, atop the mount where Jesus is believed to have preached his most famous sermon...As I sat and gazed upon the surrounding hills gently sloping to an inland sea, a feeling of peace came over me. It soon grew to a blissful stillness that silenced my thoughts. In an instant, the sense of being a separate self—an “I” or a “me”—vanished...The experience lasted just a few moments, but returned many times as I gazed out over the land where Jesus is believed to have walked, gathered his apostles, and worked many of his miracles.”
<br><br>
<br><br>
“Communion with the Holy Spirit,” Ensign, Mar. 2002, 4
|authorsources="How Can We Find Truth? Part 4," ''Amateur Thinker'', February 2011, <nowiki>http://www.theamateurthinker.com/2011/02/how-can-we-find-truth-part-4/.</nowiki>
</blockquote>
|link=
|subject=
|summary=
}}
}}
{{propaganda|The author links to an article by "The Amateur Thinker" and the list of "spiritual experiences" that people have felt. At this moment<ref>This response was written 25 February 2019</ref> the sources for these experiences are missing. The video makes interesting claims. It focuses specifically on the argument from diversity (the one made just above by the author of the CES Letter) against the use of spiritual experiences in Latter-day Saint epistemology and argues for a "pragmatic approach" which includes evaluating empirical evidence first and then seeking spiritual experiences. It sounds awfully like D&C 9:7–9. Regarding the list of spiritual experiences in this claim specifically, it is interesting that none of these experiences deny God but help people to come unto him. The atheist was the one converting to religion (D&C 84:46-47). The video from Amateur Thinker also claims that people feel what is called the "elevation emotion" when claiming to feel the Spirit. We've already discussed experiences of those in other religions. The elevation emotion and other neuroscientific explanations for spiritual experience are discussed [[Question: Is the Latter-day Saint conception of testimony from the Holy Ghost threatened by neuroscience or psychology?|here]] for those that are interested in learning more.
}}
'''Longer response(s) to criticism:'''
*[[Question: Is the Latter-day Saint conception of testimony from the Holy Ghost threatened by neuroscience or psychology?]]
{{Back to top}}
==Response to claim: "it would likewise be arrogant of a Latter-day Saint to deny their spiritual experiences and testimonies of the truthfulness of their own religion"==
{{IndexClaimItemShort
|title=Letter to a CES Director (April 2013 revision)
|claim=it would likewise be arrogant of a Latter-day Saint to deny their spiritual experiences and testimonies of the truthfulness of their own religion... Only .2% of the world’s population are members of God’s true Church.  This is God’s model and standard of efficiency?
|source=[[Criticism of Mormonism/Books/An Insider's View of Mormon Origins/Index/Chapter 4#132-133, n71|Grant Palmer, ''An Insider's View of Mormon Origins'', 132-133, n71]].
}}
{{information|Latter-day Saints are not taught to deny the spiritual experiences of others. We are taught to understand them in certain ways as is demonstrated by the article above responding to claims of spiritual experiences of people in other religions. The Gospel teaches us that not everyone will be a member of the Church in this life but that is okay.
|L=Criticism of Mormonism/Online documents/Letter to a CES Director/Testimony & Spiritual Witness Concerns & Questions
}}
'''Longer response(s) to criticism:'''
*[[Question: Why would the true church of Jesus Christ be comprised of only a small percentage of the population of the Earth?]]
{{Back to top}}
==Response to claim: "If God’s method to revealing truth is through feelings, it’s a pretty ineffective method"==
{{IndexClaimItemShort
|title=Letter to a CES Director (April 2013 revision)
|claim=If God’s method to revealing truth is through feelings, it’s a pretty ineffective method.
|source=[[Criticism of Mormonism/Books/An Insider's View of Mormon Origins/Index/Chapter 4#133|Grant Palmer, ''An Insider's View of Mormon Origins'', 133]]
}}
{{misinformation|The Gospel does not teach that one should make decisions regarding the truth of something simply through "feelings". Moroni tells us to ponder (Moroni 10:3-5). Oliver Cowdery gave us studying it out in our mind and then asking (D&C 9:7-9). Scripture admonishes us to seek wisdom out of the best of books for those that do not have faith (D&C 88:118) and to use all scientific disciplines to better understand the Gospel (D&C 88:77–80).
|L=Criticism of Mormonism/Online documents/Letter to a CES Director/Testimony & Spiritual Witness Concerns & Questions
}}
{{Back to top}}


===="I felt the Spirit watching 'Saving Private Ryan' and the 'Schindler’s List'. Both R-rated and horribly violent movies. I also felt the Spirit watching 'Forrest Gump' and the 'Lion King'."====
==Response to claim: "Even prophets are often wrong."==
{{CESLetterItem
{{IndexClaimItemShort
|claim=The author states, "I felt the Spirit watching 'Saving Private Ryan' and the 'Schindler’s List'. Both R-rated and horribly violent movies. I also felt the Spirit watching 'Forrest Gump' and the 'Lion King'."
|title=Debunking FAIR's Debunking (June 2014)
|answer=
|claim=Even prophets are often wrong. Brigham Young, for example, taught now-repudiated doctrines of racism, Adam-God, and Blood-Atonement. Moreover, prophets and scriptures sometimes conflict with one another. Not only do Prophets sometimes conflict with scripture, they conflict with each other. Yesterday’s doctrine is today’s false doctrine and yesterday’s prophet is today’s heretic, remember? Pointing to prophets and scriptures as a standard of “confirming” your feelings again not only does not answer the question, it creates more questions than answers.
*The author seems to equate everything that makes him feel good or inspired with "feeling the spirit." Just because one can "feel the spirit" regarding religious matters does not mean that one is unable to feel good or inspired about anything else.
*The movies "Saving Private Ryan" and "Schindler's List" are very accurate and profound dramas that depict certain important historical events: In this case, the D-day invasion and the Holocast. Yes, they are "R-rated and horribly violent movies," nevertheless they are still deeply moving. We are moved by these portrayals because we empathize with the sacrifice and suffering of those depicted. On the other hand, watching "Forrest Gump" simply makes a person feel good. Just because we seek to "confirmation of the spirit" in religious matters in order to receive confirmation of their truthfulness does not require us to be "dead in feeling" to the rest of life.
|link=
|subject=
|summary=
}}
}}
{{propaganda| Yes, prophets are fallible. There are times when they have taught now repudiated concepts, but it doesn't follow that it therefore makes revelation an unreliable source of knowledge. What ''would'' bring it more into question would be if the prophet claimed direct revelation for some concept but then physical evidence didn't support such a concept.
<br>
The reason we have scriptures is so we can test the prophet's word since they are the "standard works". The author makes a broad claim about the scriptures without supporting evidence. The best way to test such an assertion is to read the scriptures contextually and holistically which we have tools for.
|L=Criticism of Mormonism/Online documents/Letter to a CES Director/Testimony & Spiritual Witness Concerns & Questions
}}
'''Longer response(s) to criticism:'''
*[[Question: If prophets are fallible, does this make spiritual epistemology unreliable?]]
*[[Question: How do Mormons understand prophetic revelation?]]
*[[Question: How can one best read and understand the scriptures?]]
*[[Question: How can one view contradictions in Scripture in a faithful way?]]
{{Back to top}}
==Response to claim: "Joseph Smith received a revelation, through the peep stone in his hat, to send Hiram Page and Oliver Cowdery to Toronto, Canada for the sole purpose of selling the copyright of the Book of Mormon"==
{{IndexClaimItemShort
|title=Letter to a CES Director (April 2013 revision)
|claim=Joseph Smith received a revelation, through the peep stone in his hat, to send Hiram Page and Oliver Cowdery to Toronto, Canada for the sole purpose of selling the copyright of the Book of Mormon. . . . The mission failed and the prophet was asked why his revelation was wrong.Joseph decided to inquire of the Lord regarding the question.  The following is a quote from Book of Mormon witness David Whitmer’s testimony:“…and behold the following revelation came through the stone: ‘Some revelations are of God; and some revelations are of man: and some revelations are of the devil.’  So we see that the revelation to go to Toronto and sell the copy-right was not of God, but was of the devil or of the heart of man.” – David Whitmer, An Address to All Believers in Christ, p.3. How are we supposed to know what revelations are from God, from the devil, or from the heart of man if even the Prophet Joseph Smith couldn’t tell?  What kind of a god and method is this if Heavenly Father allows Satan to interfere with our direct line of communication to Him?
}}
{{misinformation|The account by Whitmer (who did not go on the trip) does not correlate with the accounts by those who actually went. There are ways to understand whether something came from God or Satan.
|L=Criticism of Mormonism/Online documents/Letter to a CES Director/Testimony & Spiritual Witness Concerns & Questions
}}
'''Longer response(s) to criticism:'''
*[[Question: Did Joseph Smith receive a revelation instructing him to to sell the copyright to the Book of Mormon in Canada and later claim that the revelation was false?]]
*[[Question: Are there any eyewitness accounts of the events that resulted in the trip to Canada to sell the Book of Mormon copyright?]]
*[[Question: How did the erroneous story of the attempt to sell the Book of Mormon copyright develop over time?]]
*[[Question: How does David Whitmer's account of the attempt to sell the Book of Mormon copyright compare to those of the eyewitnesses?]]
*[[Question: How did Latter-day Saint scholars respond to the attempt to sell the Book of Mormon copyright prior to Page's letter coming to light?]]
*[[Question: How can we tell if a modern revelation comes from God or Satan?]]
{{Back to top}}
==Response to claim: "I saw a testimony as more than just spiritual experiences and feelings.  I saw that we had evidence and logic on our side based on the correlated narrative I was fed by the Church about its origins."==
{{IndexClaimItemShort
|title=Letter to a CES Director (April 2013 revision)
|claim=I saw a testimony as more than just spiritual experiences and feelings.  I saw that we had evidence and logic on our side based on the correlated narrative I was fed by the Church about its origins.
}}
{{propaganda|The mention of the "correlated narrative" is a reference to popular ex-Mormon complaints about the correlated curriculum. A testimony ''is'' more than just spiritual experiences and feelings - the author neglects to mention other important elements in Latter-day Saint epistemology. Logic and reason are important elements along with a spiritual witness.
|L=Criticism of Mormonism/Online documents/Letter to a CES Director/Testimony & Spiritual Witness Concerns & Questions
}}
{{Back to top}}
==Response to claim: "What about the members who felt the Spirit from Dunn’s fabricated and false stories?"==
{{IndexClaimItemShort
|title=Letter to a CES Director (April 2013 revision)
|claim=[Paul H.] Dunn was a General Authority of the Church for many years.  He was a very popular speaker who told incredible faith-promoting war and baseball stories.  Many times Dunn shared these stories in the presence of the prophet, apostles, and seventies.  Stories like how God protected him as enemy machine-gun bullets ripped away his clothing, gear, and helmet without ever touching his skin and how he was preserved by the Lord.  Members of the Church shared how they really felt the Spirit as they listened to Dunn’s testimony and stories. Unfortunately, Dunn was later caught lying about all his war and baseball stories and was forced to apologize to the members.  He became the first General Authority to gain “emeritus” status and was removed from public Church life. What about the members who felt the Spirit from Dunn’s fabricated and false stories?  What does this say about the Spirit and what the Spirit really is?"
|source=[[Criticism of Mormonism/Books/An Insider's View of Mormon Origins/Index/Chapter 4#132, n68-69|Grant Palmer, ''An Insiders View of Mormon Origins'', 132, n68-69]]
|provenance={{CriticalWork:Palmer:Insider|pages=132}}
}}
{{misinformation|Simply receiving a warm feeling about a speech or article is not enough to call it revelation or a confirmation of the spirit. There are perfectly sound ways to make sense of the Spirit's presence while watching, reading, or listening to fictional material.
|L=Criticism of Mormonism/Online documents/Letter to a CES Director/Testimony & Spiritual Witness Concerns & Questions
}}
'''Longer response(s) to criticism:'''
*[[Question: Who was Paul H. Dunn and what happened to him?]]
*[[Question: Many who listened to Elder Dunn's stories felt the spirit. Why would one feel the spirit upon hearing a story that was fabricated? Doesn't this confirm a lie?]]
*[[Question: Why did Elder Dunn exaggerate elements of these stories?]]
{{Back to top}}
==Response to claim: "a testimony is to be found in the bearing of it"==
{{IndexClaimItemShort
|title=Letter to a CES Director (April 2013 revision)
|claim=[Boyd K. Packer said] "How can I bear testimony until I get one? How can I testify that God lives, that Jesus is the Christ, and that the gospel is true? If I do not have such a testimony, would that not be dishonest?’  Oh, if I could teach you this one principle: a testimony is to be found in the bearing of it!"
– Boyd K. Packer, The Quest for Spiritual Knowledge.<br><br>How is this honest?  How is this ethical?  What kind of advice are these Apostles giving when they’re telling you that if you don’t have a testimony, bear one anyway?  How is this not lying?  There’s a difference between saying you know something and you believe something. What about members and investigators who are on the other side listening to your 'testimony'?  How are they supposed to know whether you actually do have a testimony of Mormonism or if you’re just following Packer and Oaks’ advice and you’re lying your way into one?
}}
{{propaganda|Elder Packer is talking about having ''faith'', not about "lying your way" into having a testimony.
|L=Criticism of Mormonism/Online documents/Letter to a CES Director/Testimony & Spiritual Witness Concerns & Questions
}}
'''Longer response(s) to criticism:'''
*[[Question: Did Elder Boyd K. Packer suggest that we should "lie our way" into obtaining a testimony?]]
{{Back to top}}
==Response to claim: "how can they be sure of the reliability of this same exact process in telling them that Mormonism is true?"==
{{IndexClaimItemShort
|title=Letter to a CES Director (April 2013 revision)
|claim= There are many members who share their testimonies that the Spirit told them that they were to marry this person or go to this school or move to this location or start up this business or invest in this investment.  They rely on this Spirit in making critical life decisions.  When the decision turns out to be not only incorrect but disastrous, the fault lies on the individual and never on the Spirit.  The individual didn’t have the discernment or it was the individual’s hormones talking or it was the individual’s greed that was talking or the individual wasn’t worthy at the time.  This poses a profound flaw and dilemma:  if individuals can be so convinced that they’re being led by the Spirit but yet be so wrong about what the Spirit tells them, how can they be sure of the reliability of this same exact process in telling them that Mormonism is true?
|source=[[Criticism of Mormonism/Books/An Insider's View of Mormon Origins/Index/Chapter 4#133 - "Nor does the Spirit, which testifies of the Book of Mormon, confirm the historical reality of the book"|Grant Palmer, ''An Insider's View of Mormon Origins'', 133]]
}}
{{propaganda| There are a number of things to consider when faced with the type of situation that the author describes besides those claimed. Confirmation of the spirit requires sincere questioning and study before receiving a witness. The most important thing to remember is how this process has provided blessings and even miracles in our lives. We shouldn't discount the process when we're meant to be tested and when we've already seen blessings of this same process in our lives. Our testimony of the Book of Mormon and the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints is not something that is casually obtained. It requires sincere study, prayer, and nourishing our testimony through both intellectual and spiritual means throughout our entire lives.
|L=Criticism of Mormonism/Online documents/Letter to a CES Director/Testimony & Spiritual Witness Concerns & Questions
}}
'''Longer response(s) to criticism:'''
*[[Question: Why might someone not be able to see their spiritual impressions come to successful, obvious, and/or beautiful fruition?]]
*[[Question: Is prayer the only element required in the determination of truth?]]
{{Back to top}}
==Response to claim: "I felt the Spirit watching 'Saving Private Ryan' and the 'Schindler’s List'. Both R-rated and horribly violent movies. I also felt the Spirit watching 'Forrest Gump' and the 'Lion King'."==
{{IndexClaimItemShort
|title=Letter to a CES Director (April 2013 revision)
|claim=I felt the Spirit watching 'Saving Private Ryan' and the 'Schindler’s List'. Both R-rated and horribly violent movies. I also felt the Spirit watching 'Forrest Gump' and the 'Lion King'.
}}
{{propaganda|There are perfectly sound ways to make sense of the Spirit's presence while watching, reading, or listening to fictional material.
|L=Criticism of Mormonism/Online documents/Letter to a CES Director/Testimony & Spiritual Witness Concerns & Questions
}}
'''Longer response(s) to criticism:'''
*[[Question: Can a person "feel the spirit" while watching movies?]]
{{Back to top}}
==Response to claim: "Why did I feel the Spirit as I listened to the stories of apostates sharing how they discovered for themselves that Mormonism is not true?"==
{{IndexClaimItemShort
|title=Letter to a CES Director (April 2013 revision)
|claim=Why did I feel the Spirit as I listened to the stories of apostates sharing how they discovered for themselves that Mormonism is not true?
}}
{{propaganda|There are plenty of ways to make sense of feeling the spirit during this time.
|L=Criticism of Mormonism/Online documents/Letter to a CES Director/Testimony & Spiritual Witness Concerns & Questions
}}
'''Longer response(s) to criticism:'''
*[[Question: Can someone feel the spirit when listening to stories of apostasy?]]
*[["Recognizing the Voice of the Spirit" (Podcast): "How can I come to know that spiritual experience is not just a product of chemical processes in the brain?"]]
{{Back to top}}
==Response to claim: "This thought-provoking video raises some profound questions and challenges to the Latter-day Saint concept of "testimony" and receiving a witness from the Holy Ghost..."==
{{IndexClaimItemShort
|title=Letter to a CES Director (March 2015 revision)
|claim= This thought-provoking video raises some profound questions and challenges to the Latter-day Saint concept of "testimony" and receiving a witness from the Holy Ghost or Spirit as being a unique, reliable, and trustworthy source to discerning truth and reality:
}}
{{propaganda| The author uses a video that basically summarizes his claims regarding the Spirit. The video includes several clips of people describing spiritual experiences. One includes a young man's brother who prayed about The Book of Hagoth from the Mentinah Archives and claims to have received a confirmatory witness of its truth. The video also includes an unverified recording--supposedly from a member of the FLDS church who claims she received a witness from the Holy Ghost that polygamy was a true principle and that that church was true. Since the recording is only vocal and not visual, the provenance remains ''slightly'' dubious. It includes members of Islam who state their confidence in Islam and one woman in particular of her impactful witness from God. It also includes a woman from the Heaven's Gate cult who expresses deep feelings about her being a part of it.  There are ways for Latter-day Saints to make sense of this.
|L=Criticism of Mormonism/Online documents/Letter to a CES Director/Testimony & Spiritual Witness Concerns & Questions
}}
'''Longer response(s) to criticism:'''
*[[Question: Can a person receive a spiritual witness about any book?]]
*[[Question: What do the Mentinah Papers or the Nemenhah People have to do with the Mormons?]]
*[[Question: Did Brigham promise that Joseph Smith III would eventually take over the Church?]]
*[[Question: What indications were there that Brigham Young would be Joseph Smith's successor?]]
*[[Question: What are the standards for prophetic succession in The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints?]]
*[[Question: Can the Spirit confirm to me that I'm okay to leave the Church?]]
{{endnotes sources}}
{{FAIRAnalysisHeader
|title=[[../|Letter to a CES Director]]
|author=Jeremy Runnells
|noauthor=
|section=Testimony & Spiritual Witness Concerns & Questions
|previous=[[../Kinderhook Plates and Translator & Seer Claims Concerns & Questions|Kinderhook Plates and Translator & Seer Claims Concerns & Questions]]
|next=[[../Priesthood Restoration Concerns & Questions|Priesthood Restoration Concerns & Questions]]
|notes=
}}
{{Back to top}}
[[Category:Letter to a CES Director]]
[[es:La crítica del mormonismo/Documentos en línea/Carta a un Director del SEI/Inquietudes y Preguntas del Testimonio y Testigo Espiritual]]
[[pt:A crítica do mormonismo/Documentos online/Carta a um Diretor SEI/Testemunho, Espirituais Testemunhas preocupações e perguntas]]

Latest revision as of 20:21, 13 April 2024

Detailed response to CES Letter, Testimony and Spiritual Witness



A FAIR Analysis of: [[../|Letter to a CES Director]], a work by author: Jeremy Runnells

Response to section "Testimony/Spiritual Witness Concerns & Questions"

Summary: The author asks the question, "Why is this Spirit so unreliable and inconsistent? How can I trust such an inconsistent and contradictory Source for knowing that Mormonism is worth betting my life, time, money, heart, mind, and obedience to?" This section touches on themes of epistemology.


Jump to details:

Response to claim: "Every major religion has members who claim the same thing: God or God’s spirit bore witness to them"

The author(s) of Letter to a CES Director (April 2013 revision) make(s) the following claim:

Every major religion has members who claim the same thing: God or God’s spirit bore witness to them that their religion, prophet/pope/leaders, book(s), and teachings are true.

FAIR's Response

Fact checking results: The author has stated erroneous information or misinterpreted their sources

This is not a characteristic of "every major religion". Latter-day Saints have a theology that can reconcile the reports of spiritual experiences of people among other religions. Latter-day Saints believe that truth can be found in every religion and that God can work through these religions to bring individuals unto him gradually.

Logical Fallacy: Composition—The author assumes that something is true of the whole from the fact that it is true of some part of the whole.

In this case the author asserts that because Mormonism has members who claim that God or God's spirit bore witness to them, that all religions have members who claim that God or God's spirit bore witness to them.


Longer response(s) to criticism:

Response to claim: "Let's play a game! Try to match Atheism and these 8 religions to the following 21 quotes."

The author(s) of Debunking FAIR's Debunking, June 2014 make(s) the following claim:

Let’s play a game! Try to match Atheism and these 8 religions to the following 21 quotes. The answer key is below the last quote:

  • Atheist
  • Buddhist
  • Catholic
  • Hindu
  • Islam
  • Mormon
  • New Age
  • Protestant
  • Universal Unitarian

“I felt a burning in my heart, and a great burden seemed to have left me.”

“But what can I say? How can I describe an experience so profound and so beautiful? Shall I say that it was the most blessed experience of my life? Shall I say that [God] touched my heart and gave me a feeling of peace I had not known before? Shall I describe the tears that flowed freely from my eyes, affirming my...faith, as I...beg[ed] [God's] blessings for myself and for those I love?”

“The sense I had of divine things, would often of a sudden kindle up, as it were, a sweet burning in my heart; an ardor of soul, that I know not how to express.”

“As I read these books in a...bookstore,...I felt a burning in my heart that I should come and investigate.”

“[Even as a child], [w]ithout understanding much about the complex [doctrine]...he was attracted to [church]. There he often felt a strong feeling of peace flowing through his body.”

“I was praying...when I felt a burning shaft of...love come through my head and into my heart.”

“I truly [sic] wanted to know [the truth]. After a few weeks, I stumbled onto [texts] which… answered my questions in a way that I had not heard of before. I read everything...and I even tried the experiment of asking [God] for...his divine love. After about 6 weeks, I felt a burning in my chest and a sensation that was unlike anything I had ever felt. It was pure happiness and peace. I knew then that [God] had sent His love to me.”

“A feeling of peace and certitude would tell me when I had found the answers and often after people would help me by pointing in the right direction.”

“We gave up a lot of things. What did I get in return? I received a feeling of peace, hope and security. I no longer lay awake at night worrying. I stopped cussing. I became much more honest in all aspects of my life. [God] has changed my heart and my life. My husband’s heart is changing also. We pray all the time and really feel [God’s] presence in our marriage. My perspective has changed. My view of life has changed about what is truly important.”

“Many women described a feeling of euphoria after they committed to following [God]...One woman described a feeling of peace; she said: ‘It is like you are born again and you can start all over again, free from sin.’”

“A feeling of peace seemed to flow into me with a sense of togetherness...I felt very peaceful from inside and also felt [warmth]...”

“I felt a burning sensation in my heart.”

“That inner light, that we all have or had at some time in our existence, was nearly burnt out for me. But in the [church]...I found a feeling of peace, inner solitude and quietness that I’d also found in reading the [text] and pondering over its meaning and trying to practice what it tells us.”

“For the first time I not only felt accountable for my past sins but I had to fight back tears. I knew that I had let down [God] [and] my family...However, I also knew I was forgiven! [It] gave me a feeling of peace that I have never felt it in my whole life. I felt like I had a huge weight lifted off of me and that I was finally home and free...I felt like a new person.”

“Every time I am there [at the church building], a feeling of peace overcomes me.”

“Every time I was with the [church members], I felt this warm feeling, a feeling of peace and for the first time in my life since my church-going days, I wanted to follow [God]...”

“About 10 years ago, when Jenny and I decided to start a family, we began looking for a spiritual community for our kids. During my first service at [the church]...I was hooked. I recall the feeling of peace that I felt when I was attending [services].”

“The power of [God] came into me then. I had this warm and overwhelming feeling of peace and security. It’s hard to explain. I had to...stop myself from falling backward.”

“[The religious leader] looked into my eyes deeply for a moment, and I experienced a feeling of peace and love unlike anything I had ever experienced before.”

“[After praying,] [i]mmediately I was flooded with a deep feeling of peace, comfort, and hope.”

“I recently spent an afternoon on the northwestern shore of the Sea of Galilee, atop the mount where Jesus is believed to have preached his most famous sermon...As I sat and gazed upon the surrounding hills gently sloping to an inland sea, a feeling of peace came over me. It soon grew to a blissful stillness that silenced my thoughts. In an instant, the sense of being a separate self—an “I” or a “me”—vanished...The experience lasted just a few moments, but returned many times as I gazed out over the land where Jesus is believed to have walked, gathered his apostles, and worked many of his miracles.”



Author's sources: "How Can We Find Truth? Part 4," Amateur Thinker, February 2011, http://www.theamateurthinker.com/2011/02/how-can-we-find-truth-part-4/.

FAIR's Response

Fact checking results: This claim contains propaganda - The author, or the author's source, is providing information or ideas in a slanted way in order to instill a particular attitude or response in the reader

The author links to an article by "The Amateur Thinker" and the list of "spiritual experiences" that people have felt. At this moment[1] the sources for these experiences are missing. The video makes interesting claims. It focuses specifically on the argument from diversity (the one made just above by the author of the CES Letter) against the use of spiritual experiences in Latter-day Saint epistemology and argues for a "pragmatic approach" which includes evaluating empirical evidence first and then seeking spiritual experiences. It sounds awfully like D&C 9:7–9. Regarding the list of spiritual experiences in this claim specifically, it is interesting that none of these experiences deny God but help people to come unto him. The atheist was the one converting to religion (D&C 84:46-47). The video from Amateur Thinker also claims that people feel what is called the "elevation emotion" when claiming to feel the Spirit. We've already discussed experiences of those in other religions. The elevation emotion and other neuroscientific explanations for spiritual experience are discussed here for those that are interested in learning more.


Longer response(s) to criticism:

Response to claim: "it would likewise be arrogant of a Latter-day Saint to deny their spiritual experiences and testimonies of the truthfulness of their own religion"

The author(s) of Letter to a CES Director (April 2013 revision) make(s) the following claim:

it would likewise be arrogant of a Latter-day Saint to deny their spiritual experiences and testimonies of the truthfulness of their own religion... Only .2% of the world’s population are members of God’s true Church. This is God’s model and standard of efficiency?

FAIR's Response

Fact checking results: This claim is based upon correct information - The author is providing knowledge concerning some particular fact, subject, or event

Latter-day Saints are not taught to deny the spiritual experiences of others. We are taught to understand them in certain ways as is demonstrated by the article above responding to claims of spiritual experiences of people in other religions. The Gospel teaches us that not everyone will be a member of the Church in this life but that is okay.


Longer response(s) to criticism:

Response to claim: "If God’s method to revealing truth is through feelings, it’s a pretty ineffective method"

The author(s) of Letter to a CES Director (April 2013 revision) make(s) the following claim:

If God’s method to revealing truth is through feelings, it’s a pretty ineffective method.

FAIR's Response

Fact checking results: The author has stated erroneous information or misinterpreted their sources

The Gospel does not teach that one should make decisions regarding the truth of something simply through "feelings". Moroni tells us to ponder (Moroni 10:3-5). Oliver Cowdery gave us studying it out in our mind and then asking (D&C 9:7-9). Scripture admonishes us to seek wisdom out of the best of books for those that do not have faith (D&C 88:118) and to use all scientific disciplines to better understand the Gospel (D&C 88:77–80).


Response to claim: "Even prophets are often wrong."

The author(s) of Debunking FAIR's Debunking (June 2014) make(s) the following claim:

Even prophets are often wrong. Brigham Young, for example, taught now-repudiated doctrines of racism, Adam-God, and Blood-Atonement. Moreover, prophets and scriptures sometimes conflict with one another. Not only do Prophets sometimes conflict with scripture, they conflict with each other. Yesterday’s doctrine is today’s false doctrine and yesterday’s prophet is today’s heretic, remember? Pointing to prophets and scriptures as a standard of “confirming” your feelings again not only does not answer the question, it creates more questions than answers.

FAIR's Response

Fact checking results: This claim contains propaganda - The author, or the author's source, is providing information or ideas in a slanted way in order to instill a particular attitude or response in the reader

Yes, prophets are fallible. There are times when they have taught now repudiated concepts, but it doesn't follow that it therefore makes revelation an unreliable source of knowledge. What would bring it more into question would be if the prophet claimed direct revelation for some concept but then physical evidence didn't support such a concept.


The reason we have scriptures is so we can test the prophet's word since they are the "standard works". The author makes a broad claim about the scriptures without supporting evidence. The best way to test such an assertion is to read the scriptures contextually and holistically which we have tools for.

Longer response(s) to criticism:

Response to claim: "Joseph Smith received a revelation, through the peep stone in his hat, to send Hiram Page and Oliver Cowdery to Toronto, Canada for the sole purpose of selling the copyright of the Book of Mormon"

The author(s) of Letter to a CES Director (April 2013 revision) make(s) the following claim:

Joseph Smith received a revelation, through the peep stone in his hat, to send Hiram Page and Oliver Cowdery to Toronto, Canada for the sole purpose of selling the copyright of the Book of Mormon. . . . The mission failed and the prophet was asked why his revelation was wrong.Joseph decided to inquire of the Lord regarding the question. The following is a quote from Book of Mormon witness David Whitmer’s testimony:“…and behold the following revelation came through the stone: ‘Some revelations are of God; and some revelations are of man: and some revelations are of the devil.’ So we see that the revelation to go to Toronto and sell the copy-right was not of God, but was of the devil or of the heart of man.” – David Whitmer, An Address to All Believers in Christ, p.3. How are we supposed to know what revelations are from God, from the devil, or from the heart of man if even the Prophet Joseph Smith couldn’t tell? What kind of a god and method is this if Heavenly Father allows Satan to interfere with our direct line of communication to Him?

FAIR's Response

Fact checking results: The author has stated erroneous information or misinterpreted their sources

The account by Whitmer (who did not go on the trip) does not correlate with the accounts by those who actually went. There are ways to understand whether something came from God or Satan.


Longer response(s) to criticism:

Response to claim: "I saw a testimony as more than just spiritual experiences and feelings. I saw that we had evidence and logic on our side based on the correlated narrative I was fed by the Church about its origins."

The author(s) of Letter to a CES Director (April 2013 revision) make(s) the following claim:

I saw a testimony as more than just spiritual experiences and feelings. I saw that we had evidence and logic on our side based on the correlated narrative I was fed by the Church about its origins.

FAIR's Response

Fact checking results: This claim contains propaganda - The author, or the author's source, is providing information or ideas in a slanted way in order to instill a particular attitude or response in the reader

The mention of the "correlated narrative" is a reference to popular ex-Mormon complaints about the correlated curriculum. A testimony is more than just spiritual experiences and feelings - the author neglects to mention other important elements in Latter-day Saint epistemology. Logic and reason are important elements along with a spiritual witness.


Response to claim: "What about the members who felt the Spirit from Dunn’s fabricated and false stories?"

The author(s) of Letter to a CES Director (April 2013 revision) make(s) the following claim:

[Paul H.] Dunn was a General Authority of the Church for many years. He was a very popular speaker who told incredible faith-promoting war and baseball stories. Many times Dunn shared these stories in the presence of the prophet, apostles, and seventies. Stories like how God protected him as enemy machine-gun bullets ripped away his clothing, gear, and helmet without ever touching his skin and how he was preserved by the Lord. Members of the Church shared how they really felt the Spirit as they listened to Dunn’s testimony and stories. Unfortunately, Dunn was later caught lying about all his war and baseball stories and was forced to apologize to the members. He became the first General Authority to gain “emeritus” status and was removed from public Church life. What about the members who felt the Spirit from Dunn’s fabricated and false stories? What does this say about the Spirit and what the Spirit really is?"

FAIR's Response

Fact checking results: The author has stated erroneous information or misinterpreted their sources

Simply receiving a warm feeling about a speech or article is not enough to call it revelation or a confirmation of the spirit. There are perfectly sound ways to make sense of the Spirit's presence while watching, reading, or listening to fictional material.


Longer response(s) to criticism:

Response to claim: "a testimony is to be found in the bearing of it"

The author(s) of Letter to a CES Director (April 2013 revision) make(s) the following claim:

[Boyd K. Packer said] "How can I bear testimony until I get one? How can I testify that God lives, that Jesus is the Christ, and that the gospel is true? If I do not have such a testimony, would that not be dishonest?’ Oh, if I could teach you this one principle: a testimony is to be found in the bearing of it!" – Boyd K. Packer, The Quest for Spiritual Knowledge.

How is this honest? How is this ethical? What kind of advice are these Apostles giving when they’re telling you that if you don’t have a testimony, bear one anyway? How is this not lying? There’s a difference between saying you know something and you believe something. What about members and investigators who are on the other side listening to your 'testimony'? How are they supposed to know whether you actually do have a testimony of Mormonism or if you’re just following Packer and Oaks’ advice and you’re lying your way into one?

FAIR's Response

Fact checking results: This claim contains propaganda - The author, or the author's source, is providing information or ideas in a slanted way in order to instill a particular attitude or response in the reader

Elder Packer is talking about having faith, not about "lying your way" into having a testimony.


Longer response(s) to criticism:

Response to claim: "how can they be sure of the reliability of this same exact process in telling them that Mormonism is true?"

The author(s) of Letter to a CES Director (April 2013 revision) make(s) the following claim:

There are many members who share their testimonies that the Spirit told them that they were to marry this person or go to this school or move to this location or start up this business or invest in this investment. They rely on this Spirit in making critical life decisions. When the decision turns out to be not only incorrect but disastrous, the fault lies on the individual and never on the Spirit. The individual didn’t have the discernment or it was the individual’s hormones talking or it was the individual’s greed that was talking or the individual wasn’t worthy at the time. This poses a profound flaw and dilemma: if individuals can be so convinced that they’re being led by the Spirit but yet be so wrong about what the Spirit tells them, how can they be sure of the reliability of this same exact process in telling them that Mormonism is true?

FAIR's Response

Fact checking results: This claim contains propaganda - The author, or the author's source, is providing information or ideas in a slanted way in order to instill a particular attitude or response in the reader

There are a number of things to consider when faced with the type of situation that the author describes besides those claimed. Confirmation of the spirit requires sincere questioning and study before receiving a witness. The most important thing to remember is how this process has provided blessings and even miracles in our lives. We shouldn't discount the process when we're meant to be tested and when we've already seen blessings of this same process in our lives. Our testimony of the Book of Mormon and the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints is not something that is casually obtained. It requires sincere study, prayer, and nourishing our testimony through both intellectual and spiritual means throughout our entire lives.


Longer response(s) to criticism:

Response to claim: "I felt the Spirit watching 'Saving Private Ryan' and the 'Schindler’s List'. Both R-rated and horribly violent movies. I also felt the Spirit watching 'Forrest Gump' and the 'Lion King'."

The author(s) of Letter to a CES Director (April 2013 revision) make(s) the following claim:

I felt the Spirit watching 'Saving Private Ryan' and the 'Schindler’s List'. Both R-rated and horribly violent movies. I also felt the Spirit watching 'Forrest Gump' and the 'Lion King'.

FAIR's Response

Fact checking results: This claim contains propaganda - The author, or the author's source, is providing information or ideas in a slanted way in order to instill a particular attitude or response in the reader

There are perfectly sound ways to make sense of the Spirit's presence while watching, reading, or listening to fictional material.


Longer response(s) to criticism:

Response to claim: "Why did I feel the Spirit as I listened to the stories of apostates sharing how they discovered for themselves that Mormonism is not true?"

The author(s) of Letter to a CES Director (April 2013 revision) make(s) the following claim:

Why did I feel the Spirit as I listened to the stories of apostates sharing how they discovered for themselves that Mormonism is not true?

FAIR's Response

Fact checking results: This claim contains propaganda - The author, or the author's source, is providing information or ideas in a slanted way in order to instill a particular attitude or response in the reader

There are plenty of ways to make sense of feeling the spirit during this time.


Longer response(s) to criticism:

Response to claim: "This thought-provoking video raises some profound questions and challenges to the Latter-day Saint concept of "testimony" and receiving a witness from the Holy Ghost..."

The author(s) of Letter to a CES Director (March 2015 revision) make(s) the following claim:

This thought-provoking video raises some profound questions and challenges to the Latter-day Saint concept of "testimony" and receiving a witness from the Holy Ghost or Spirit as being a unique, reliable, and trustworthy source to discerning truth and reality:

FAIR's Response

Fact checking results: This claim contains propaganda - The author, or the author's source, is providing information or ideas in a slanted way in order to instill a particular attitude or response in the reader

The author uses a video that basically summarizes his claims regarding the Spirit. The video includes several clips of people describing spiritual experiences. One includes a young man's brother who prayed about The Book of Hagoth from the Mentinah Archives and claims to have received a confirmatory witness of its truth. The video also includes an unverified recording--supposedly from a member of the FLDS church who claims she received a witness from the Holy Ghost that polygamy was a true principle and that that church was true. Since the recording is only vocal and not visual, the provenance remains slightly dubious. It includes members of Islam who state their confidence in Islam and one woman in particular of her impactful witness from God. It also includes a woman from the Heaven's Gate cult who expresses deep feelings about her being a part of it. There are ways for Latter-day Saints to make sense of this.


Longer response(s) to criticism:


Notes

  1. This response was written 25 February 2019


A FAIR Analysis of:
[[../|Letter to a CES Director]]
A work by author: Jeremy Runnells