|
|
| (1,000 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| | + | {{GregSmithUser:Browsebar}} |
| | + | == Links to check == |
| | + | {{Set off quote 1 |
| | + | |color=eaf9f5 |
| | + | |image=Russell_nelson_official_portrait_2018.jpeg |
| | + | |I believe that if the Lord were speaking to you directly tonight, the first thing He would make sure you understand is your true identity. My dear friends, you are literally spirit children of God. ... |
| | | | |
| | + | Labels ''can'' be fun and indicate your support for any number of positive things. Many labels will change for you with the passage of time. And not all labels are of equal value. But if any label replaces your most important identifiers, the results can be spiritually suffocating. ... |
| | | | |
| − | "Somebody could walk into this room<br>
| + | ''Who are you?'' First and foremost, you are a child of God. |
| − | And say your life is on fire.<br>
| |
| − | It's all over the evening news,<br>
| |
| − | All about the fire in your life on the evening news."<br>
| |
| − | :- Paul Simon, "Crazy Love, Vol. II," ''Graceland'' album (1986).
| |
| | | | |
| − | ----
| + | Second, as a member of the Church, you are a child of the covenant. And third, you are a disciple of Jesus Christ. |
| − | {{Snuffer/FalseStatement}}
| |
| | | | |
| − | {{Snuffer/DoubleStandard}}
| + | Tonight, I plead with you not to ''replace'' these three paramount and unchanging identifiers with any others, because doing so could stymie your progress or pigeonhole you in a stereotype that could potentially thwart your eternal progression. |
| | | | |
| − | {{Snuffer/HistoricalError}}
| + | For example, if you are identified mainly as an American, those who are not Americans may think, “I know everything there is to know about you” and attribute erroneous beliefs to you. |
| | | | |
| − | {{Snuffer/SelfContradiction|Remarks about it here}}
| + | If you identify yourself by your political affiliation, you will instantly be categorized as having certain beliefs—though I don’t know anyone who believes everything that their preferred political party presently embraces. |
| | | | |
| − | {{Snuffer/ContradictsBoM}}
| + | We could go on and on, rehearsing the constraints of various labels that we put on ourselves or that other people place upon us. ... |
| | | | |
| − | {{Snuffer/ContradictsDC}}
| + | How tragic it is when someone believes the label another person has given them. ... |
| | | | |
| − | {{Snuffer/SourceDistortion}}
| + | [Satan] rejoices in labels because they divide us and restrict the way we think about ourselves and each other. How sad it is when we honor labels more than we honor each other. |
| | | | |
| − | {{Snuffer/ContradictsJoseph}}
| + | Labels can lead to judging and animosity. Any ''abuse'' or ''prejudice'' toward another because of nationality, race, sexual orientation, gender, educational degrees, culture, or other significant identifiers is offensive to our Maker! Such mistreatment causes us to live beneath our stature as His covenant sons and daughters! |
| | | | |
| − | {{Snuffer/Undercuts|Remarks here}}
| + | There are various labels that may be very important to you, of course. Please do not misunderstand me. I am not saying that other designations and identifiers are not significant. I am simply saying that no identifier should ''displace'', ''replace'', or ''take priority over'' these three enduring designations: “child of God,” “child of the covenant,” and “disciple of Jesus Christ.” |
| − | ----
| |
| − | Hypocrisy re: citations
| |
| | | | |
| − | Because his remarks are targeted at believing members of the Church of Jesus Christ, Snuffer cites three authors for whom he normally has little respect:
| + | Any identifier that is not compatible with these three basic designations will ultimately let you down. Other labels will disappoint you in time because they do not have the power to lead you toward eternal life in the celestial kingdom of God. |
| − | * Brigham Young
| |
| − | * Heber C. Kimball
| |
| − | * George A. Smith
| |
| | | | |
| − | Snuffer uses citations from each to argue that these Church leaders foretold a potential loss of priesthood authority by the Church:
| + | Worldly identifiers will never give you a vision of who you can ultimately become. They will never affirm your divine DNA or your unlimited, divine potential.<ref>Russell M. Nelson, "Choices for Eternity," Worldwide Devotional for Young Single Adults, 15 May 2022 {[link|url=https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/broadcasts/worldwide-devotional-for-young-adults/2022/05/12nelson?lang=eng}}</ref>}} |
| − | | |
| − | :To the same effect, during the Mormon Reformation Heber C. Kimball said: “We receive the priesthood and power and authority. If we make a bad use of the priesthood, so you not see that the day will come when God will reckon with us, and he will take it from us and give it to those who will make better use of it? (JD6: 125.) George A. Smith said, “God has set his hand at the present time to establish his kingdom. But unless the Saints will so live and so exert themselves that they can preserve the purity of the holy Priesthood among them, the work will be left to other people.” (JD 6: 161.) Even Brigham Young commented on the possibility that only an LDS remnant would remain to carry forward the work: “God will preserve a portion of the meek and the humble of this people to bear off the Kingdom to the inhabitants of the earth, and will defend His Priesthood; for it is the last time, the last gathering time; and He will not suffer the Priesthood to be again driven from the earth.” (JD 2: 184.)<ref>{{CriticalWork:Snuffer:Mesa|pages=6 note 18}}</ref>
| |
| − | | |
| − | But, why would Snuffer regard these authors as authoritative? He has made his disdain for them clear elsewhere.
| |
| − | | |
| − | ===Snuffer's attitude toward Brigham Young and other apostles===
| |
| − | For example, he wrote of Brigham Young:
| |
| − | | |
| − | :Murder was allowed [in Utah] but only when President Young thought it was needed for the salvation of the victim.<ref name="PTHG">{{CriticalWork:Snuffer:Passing the Heavenly Gift}}.</ref>{{Rp|223}}
| |
| − | | |
| − | Snuffer also insists {{nl}} that Brigham Young did not receive all of the keys which Joseph could have passed on.<ref name="PTHG"></ref>{{Rp|36, 81-86}}
| |
| − | | |
| − | George A. Smith and Heber C. Kimball were both apostles, and Snuffer [[Criticism_of_Mormonism/Books/Passing_the_Heavenly_Gift/Claims_about_priesthood_ordination#Could_Brigham_Young_Qualify_to_Claim_Sealing_Power.3F|denies]] that they were in a position to have the sealing power from Joseph which they claimed to hold.<ref>{{NC}}</ref> He [[Criticism_of_Mormonism/Books/Passing_the_Heavenly_Gift/Brigham_Young_and_apostles_not_witnesses_of_Christ|claims]] too that they were not suited to be true apostles that could witness of Christ's resurrection.<ref name="PTHG"></ref>{{Rp|243}}
| |
| − | | |
| − | In Snuffer's view, something vital was lost with Joseph's death, and Brigham and the rest of the apostles were mistaken to think that they had it. He regards Brigham Young as one who winked at murder, and further blames the second President of the Church for:
| |
| − | * instituting "coercive" programs<ref name="PTHG"></ref>{{Rp|132}}
| |
| − | * "using 'blood atonement'...rhetoric [which] resulted in tragedy"<ref name="PTHG"></ref>{{Rp|132}}
| |
| − | * "intimidat[ing] 'sinners'"<ref name="PTHG"></ref>{{Rp|133}}
| |
| − | * sanctioning the extrajudicial murder of convicts<ref name="PTHG"></ref>{{Rp|137}}
| |
| − | * "justify[ing] the elimination of an apostate" (the Parrish-Potter murders)<ref name="PTHG"></ref>{{Rp|138-9}}
| |
| − | * causing the murder of the AIken party<ref name="PTHG"></ref>{{Rp|140}}
| |
| − | * "institut[ing] the covenant in the temple ceremonies requiring all covenant-makers to swear to avenge the blood of Joseph and Hyrum Smith"<ref name="PTHG"></ref>{{Rp|143}}
| |
| − | * using his authority to have "Dimick Huntington...[and] Hosea Stout...slaughter Indians"<ref name="PTHG"></ref>{{Rp|145}}
| |
| − | | |
| − | Snuffer uses these claims (which are not explored in any detail, but only lightly touched on—presumably to shock the reader) to conclude that:
| |
| − | | |
| − | :Although the gentile church was established by a Prophet upon whom the Lord conferred the fullness of the priesthood, the transfer of that fullness is more presumed in the accounts than proven....But subsequent events can help illustrate whether the prophesied gentile lyings, deceits, wickedness, abominations, murders and hypocrisy foretold by Christ have happened.<ref name ="PTHG"></ref>{{Rp|145-146}}
| |
| − | | |
| − | For Snuffer, then, Brigham's rule was a corrupt one marred by murder, violence, coercion, and hypocrisy: evidence that the Church did not retain what Joseph had started with. And, Heber C. Kimball and George A. Smith were either in the First Presidency or Quorum of the Twelve during this period.
| |
| − | | |
| − | It is strange, then, that Snuffer would cite them as authorities. How can such men be said to have the spirit of prophecy, or the spirit of the Lord to guide them or the Church?
| |
| − | | |
| − | It seems obvious that Snuffer cites them ''only'' because he thinks he can enlist their support for his theories. If Snuffer's stake president, on the other hand, had cited Brigham Young's witness that he had all the keys from Joseph, Snuffer would doubtless reject this witness: we have seen what he truly thinks of Brigham.
| |
