Array

Criticism of Mormonism/Books/Early Mormonism and the Magic World View: Difference between revisions

mNo edit summary
 
(91 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{draft}}
{{Main Page}}
==About this work==


Author: [[D. Michael Quinn]]


:I have not checked every reference in Quinn's book, but every reference that I have checked has been inaccurate in some way. In some cases Quinn has misinterpreted the source. In some cases he proof texts the quotation, and a fuller reading of the text undermines his case. And sometimes he is just plain wrong.
{{To learn more box:responses to: D. Michael Quinn}}
: &mdash; <small>{{FR-12-2-15}} (footnote 23)</small>
{{H1
|L=Criticism of Mormonism/Books/Early Mormonism and the Magic World View
|H=Response to "Early Mormonism and the Magic World View"
|T=Early Mormonism and the Magic World View
|A=D. Michael Quinn
|>=[[Criticism of Mormonism/Books/The Mormon Hierarchy: Origins of Power|''The Mormon Hierarchy: Origins of Power'']]
}}
<onlyinclude>
{{H2
|L=Criticism of Mormonism/Books/Early Mormonism and the Magic World View
|H=Response to claims made in ''Early Mormonism and the Magic World View'' by D. Michael Quinn
|S=
|L1=Response to claims made in Early Mormonism and the Magic World View, "Chapter 1: Early America's Heritage of Religion and Magic"
|L2=Response to claims made in Early Mormonism and the Magic World View, "Chapter 2: Divining Rods, Treasure-Digging, and Seer Stones"
|L3=Response to claims made in Early Mormonism and the Magic World View, "Chapter 3: Ritual Magic, Astrology, Amulets, and Talismans"
|L4=Response to claims made in Early Mormonism and the Magic World View, "Chapter 4: Magic Parchments and Occult Mentors"
|L5=Response to claims made in Early Mormonism and the Magic World View, "Chapter 5: Visions and the Coming Forth of the Book of Mormon"
|L6=Response to claims made in Early Mormonism and the Magic World View, "Chapter 6: Mormon Scriptures, the Magic World View, and Rural New York's Intellectual Life"
|L7=Response to claims made in Early Mormonism and the Magic World View, "Chapter 7: The Persistence and Decline of Magic After 1830"
}}
</onlyinclude>


Like any subject of controversy, the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints attracts its share of antagonists. Some of these antagonists are not content to portray the Church and its doctrines fairly.
{{:Criticism of Mormonism/Books/Early Mormonism and the Magic World View/Chapter 1}}
{{:Criticism of Mormonism/Books/Early Mormonism and the Magic World View/Chapter 2}}
{{:Criticism of Mormonism/Books/Early Mormonism and the Magic World View/Chapter 3}}
{{:Criticism of Mormonism/Books/Early Mormonism and the Magic World View/Chapter 4}}
{{:Criticism of Mormonism/Books/Early Mormonism and the Magic World View/Chapter 5}}
{{:Criticism of Mormonism/Books/Early Mormonism and the Magic World View/Chapter 6}}
{{:Criticism of Mormonism/Books/Early Mormonism and the Magic World View/Chapter 7}}
{{:Criticism of Mormonism/Books/Early Mormonism and the Magic World View/Use of sources}}
{{:Criticism of Mormonism/Books/Early Mormonism and the Magic World View/Apologetics}}


Some critics make statements that are self-contradictions&mdash;instances in which a critic says or writes one thing, and then makes another statement elsewhere that flatly contradicts their first statement.
These examples do not prove that these critics' arguments are without merit; they do suggest caution is warranted before accepting these authors as reliable witnesses when they speak of their own experiences connected with "Mormonism."  One should also be cautious of accepting their account of primary sources without double-checking.
==Quote mining, selective quotation and distortion==
This section addresses specific inaccuracies found in this work.
{| valign="top" border="1" style="width:100%; font-size:85%"
!The claim...!!The facts...
|-
| style="width:50%" valign="top"|Encyclopedia of Mormonism "was an official product of the LDS Church"||
The ''Encyclopedia of Mormonism'' was not an official production of the LDS Church as the ''Church News'' noted:
:The encyclopedia, according to its publisher and board of editors, is not an official publication of the Church. Daniel H. Ludlow, editor-in-chief, emphasized that the encyclopedia is not intended as a substitute for the scriptures, other official publications of the Church or doctrines as taught by the apostles and prophets.
This is indicated in the introduction to the Encyclopedia:
:Lest the role of the Encyclopedia be given more weight than it deserves, the editors make it clear that those who have written and edited have only tried to explain their understanding of Church history, doctrines, and procedures; their statements and opinions remain their own. The Encyclopedia of Mormonism is a joint product of Brigham Young University and Macmillan Publishing Company, and its contents do not necessarily represent the official position of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. In no sense does the Encyclopedia have the force and authority of scripture.
|-
|valign="top"|
*D. Michael Quinn, ''Early Mormonism and the Magic World View'', revised and enlarged edition, (Salt Lake City: Signature Books, 1998), 338, footnote 60.
*D. Michael Quinn, ''Early Mormonism and the Magic World View'', revised and enlarged edition, (Salt Lake City: Signature Books, 1998), 339, footnote 2.
||
*Gerry Avant, "Encyclopedia of Mormonism," ''LDS Church News'' (12 July 1991).
*Daniel H. Ludlow, "Preface," Encyclopedia of Mormonism, edited by  Daniel  H. Ludlow, 5vols, (New York: Macmillan, 1992), lxii.
|-
|}
'''Commentary'''
*Quinn wants to make the ''Encyclopedia of Mormonism'' an 'official' work, when the book, its editor, its authors, and publisher all assert that it is not.
<!--'''Resources'''
* InsertExtraResources-->
{{parabreak}}
{| valign="top" border="1" style="width:100%; font-size:85%"
!The claim...!!The facts...
|-
| style="width:50%" valign="top"|...how extensively Barrett's Magus circulated in the United States during the early nineteenth century is unknown."
||
"... Barrett's Magus "created an immediate sensation. . . . Barrett's book and teachings were also widely available to Smith's generation [in America]."</td>
|-
|valign="top"|
*D. Michael Quinn, ''Early Mormonism and the Magic World View'', (Salt Lake City: Signature Books, 1987), 67.  [i.e. '''1st edition''']
||
*D. Michael Quinn, ''Early Mormonism and the Magic World View'', revised and enlarged edition, (Salt Lake City: Signature Books, 1998), 84. [i.e. '''2nd edition''']
*{{FARMSReview | author=William J. Hamblin| article=That Old Black Magic: Review of D. Michael Quinn. Early Mormonism and the Magic World View, revised and enlarged edition|vol=12|num=2|date=2000|start=225|end=394 }}[http://farms.byu.edu/display.php?table=review&id=364 *]
|-
|}
'''Commentary'''
*Quinn provides no new citations or data between editions.  Yet, he alters his claim&mdash;without evidence, and despite his cited sources&mdash;to suit his thesis.
<!--'''Resources'''
* InsertExtraResources-->
{{parabreak}}
{| valign="top" border="1" style="width:100%; font-size:85%"
!Quote used...!!The rest of the story...
|-
| style="width:50%" valign="top"| "Disorderly Persons" "all jugglers [conjurors], and all persons pretending to have skill in physiognomy, palmistry, or like crafty science, or pretending to tell fortunes, or ''to discover lost goods''." (italics added, the amendation of "conjurors" is Quinn's) ||
...all persons who threaten to run away and leave their wives or children to the city or town, . . . and also all persons who not having wherewith to maintain themselves, live idle without employment, and also all persons who go about from door to door, or place themselves in the streets, highways or passages, to beg in the cities or towns where they respectively dwell, and all jugglers, and all persons pretending to have skill in physiognomy, palmistry, or like crafty science, or pretending to tell fortunes, or ''to discover where lost goods may be found''; and all persons who run away and leave their wives or children . . . ; and all persons wandering abroad . . . and not giving a good account of themselves, and all persons wandering abroad and begging, and all idle persons not having visible means of livelihood, and all common prostitutes shall be deemed and adjudged disorderly persons. (italics added)
|-
|valign="top"|
* D. Michael Quinn. ''Early Mormonism and the Magic World View'', revised and enlarged edition, (Salt Lake City: Signature Books, 1998), 26&ndash;27.
||
*  ''Laws of the State of New-York, Revised and Passed at the Thirty-Sixth Session of the Legislature'' (Albany: Southwick, 1813), 1:114; cited by {{FR-12-2-15}}
|-
|}
'''Commentary'''
* *Quinn wants the reader to read "juggler" as "conjurer," i.e. as a practitioner of magic.  In context, it is clear that those referred to are those who attempt to extract money from others by deceit, not the practice of 'magic.'  Quinn also alters the citation as noted.
<!--'''Resources'''
* InsertExtraResources-->
{{parabreak}}
{| valign="top" border="1" style="width:100%; font-size:85%"
!Quote used...!!The rest of the story...
|-
| style="width:50%" valign="top"| Quinn claims that the cost of books described in the advertisements in upstate New York in the 1820s ranged from "44 cents to a dollar each" (p. 182). ||
“The total cost of all these books is $81.62, which, divided by the seventy books on the list, provides an average cost of $1.17 per book. Thus, rather than finding a real average price, Quinn attempts to use the range of prices for books ("44 cents to a dollar each"), thereby substantially underestimating the actual costs, since there are far more books costing a dollar or more than there are costing under a dollar.”
Furthermore:
Quinn did not provide the prices for any of the rare magic books he claims Joseph read, even though such information was readily available in at least one important case. When originally published in England in 1801, Barrett's ''The Magus'' which Quinn repeatedly cites as a source that influenced Joseph cost one pound, seven shillings for the standard edition and one pound, thirteen shillings for the leatherbound edition. In the early nineteenth century, the official rate of exchange was $4.44 to the pound, while the actual rate of exchange was closer to $4.87. Thus in contemporary American currency Barrett's book would cost from $6.57 for the inexpensive edition to $8.04 for the expensive edition, to which would be added shipping costs from Europe. Thus, far from costing between "44 cents to a dollar" (p. 182) as Quinn implies, one of the most important magic books in Quinn's argument would have cost between six and a half and eight dollars. In terms of Joseph's daily wage of fifty cents, this book would represent two to three weeks' work. At the modern minimum wage, this would equate to between $400 and $600 for a single book. Or, to put it another way, to purchase Barrett's ''The Magus'' would have cost the Smiths nearly the value of one month's mortgage on their farm and house.
|-
|valign="top"|
* D. Michael Quinn. ''Early Mormonism and the Magic World View'', revised and enlarged edition, (Salt Lake City: Signature Books, 1998), 182.
||
* {{FR-12-2-16}}
|-
|}
'''Commentary'''
*Quinn grossly underestimates the cost of books in Joseph Smith's world, especially the esoteric and occult books which he claims were an influence.
<!--'''Resources'''
* InsertExtraResources-->
{{parabreak}}
{| valign="top" border="1" style="width:100%; font-size:85%"
!Quote used...!!The rest of the story...
|-
| style="width:50%" valign="top"| "The British Museum's library has never had a 3-to-1 ratio of books to London's population, yet that was the book-resident ratio of a bookstore in rural New York state in 1815." ||
"In 1976, when the population of London proper was 2,700,000, the British Museum Library contained approximately eight million volumes, with a ratio of 2.96-to-1.  But, is Quinn seriously claiming that frontier New York had a greater book-to-person ratio than contemporary London? Or that education, book reading, and scholarship were higher in Palmyra than London? Can anyone take this assertion seriously?"
|-
|valign="top"|
* D. Michael Quinn. ''Early Mormonism and the Magic World View'', revised and enlarged edition, (Salt Lake City: Signature Books, 1998), 180.
||
* {{FR-12-2-16}}
|-
|}
'''Commentary'''
* Quinn again exaggerates the availability of the occult books he insists&mdash;without evidence&mdash;were available to Joseph Smith in the early 1800s.
<!--'''Resources'''
* InsertExtraResources-->
{{parabreak}}
{| valign="top" border="1" style="width:100%; font-size:85%"
!Quote used...!!The rest of the story...
|-
| style="width:50%" valign="top"| "...it is reasonable to estimate that this one peddler was selling about 25,000 books to farmers each year...by the early 1800's there were thousands of peddlers." ||
Quinn seriously misrepresents his sources. First, he does not inform us of the semantic shift from book peddlers to peddlers of ''all'' types. It is true that there were thousands of peddlers in the United States during the early nineteenth century, but book peddlers were only a small portion of this number...Quinn's source for the claim that "one peddler was selling about 25,000 books to farmers each year" (p. 21) is an article by James Purcell. Here is what Purcell actually wrote: "During the years 1809 and 1810 he [Weems, a book peddler] sold $24,000 worth of books for him [publisher Mathew Carey] in the South."  Note how the two years' worth of sales clearly described in Purcell's article is transformed by Quinn into a single year's sales: "selling about 25,000 books to farmers ''each year''." Quinn thus magically doubles the actual book sales."
|-
|valign="top"|
* D. Michael Quinn. ''Early Mormonism and the Magic World View'', revised and enlarged edition, (Salt Lake City: Signature Books, 1998), 21.
||
* {{FR-12-2-16}}
|-
|}
'''Commentary'''
*Quinn miscites his source, doubles the cited figure, and conflates book peddlers with all peddlers.
<!--'''Resources'''
* InsertExtraResources-->
{{parabreak}}
{| valign="top" border="1" style="width:100%; font-size:85%"
!Quote used...!!The rest of the story...
|-
| style="width:50%" valign="top"| Quinn then asserts that Weems was selling these volumes "door-to-door in the rural areas of the South" to individual "farmers" ||
“Nothing could be further from the truth. Does Quinn really think that a single peddler, working door-to-door with nineteenth-century transportation, could carry and deliver 25,000 books to backwoods farmers in a single year? This would require selling nearly 2,100 books a month, or carrying and selling almost seventy books a day by a single salesman going door-to-door in rural farm country. In reality, in modern terminology Weems was a regional sales representative for Philadelphia bookseller Mathew Carey and others.  His itinerary largely focused on selling to local booksellers."
|-
|valign="top"|
* D. Michael Quinn. ''Early Mormonism and the Magic World View'', revised and enlarged edition, (Salt Lake City: Signature Books, 1998), 21.
||
* {{FR-12-2-16}}
|-
|}
'''Commentary'''
* Quinn attempts to portray a wholesaler suppling multiple bookstores as representative of one of thousands of wandering book peddlers.  He again seeks to bolster his absurd claim that multiple occult texts were easily available in New England in the 1800s.
<!--'''Resources'''
* InsertExtraResources-->
{{parabreak}}
{| valign="top" border="1" style="width:100%; font-size:85%"
!Quote used...!!The rest of the story...
|-
| style="width:50%" valign="top"| "...some [book] peddlers also stocked clandestine works'" and therefore, "if local stores would not supply occult publications to American farmers, book peddlers were there to fill the need." ||
Is there any indication of what Gilmore (the author Quinn quotes) meant by the term ''clandestine''? Indeed there is. He meant illegal pornography, as is made quite clear in his article.  Nowhere in Gilmore's article is there a single mention of a peddler selling occult books.
|-
|valign="top"|
* D. Michael Quinn. ''Early Mormonism and the Magic World View'', revised and enlarged edition, (Salt Lake City: Signature Books, 1998), 21.
||
* {{FR-12-2-16}}
|-
|}
'''Commentary'''
* Quinn again distorts his source&mdash;there was a market for pornography, which is hardly surprising.  This does not mean that there was a market for expensive occult books.
<!--'''Resources'''
* InsertExtraResources-->
{{parabreak}}
{| valign="top" border="1" style="width:100%; font-size:85%"
!Quote used...!!The rest of the story...
|-
| style="width:50%" valign="top"| Quinn repeatedly claims, citing Francis King, that Barrett's ''The Magus'' "played an important part in the English revival of magic." ||
But what "revival of magic" is King discussing? The revival of the late, not the early, nineteenth century. This is clear from the fact that the only specific example of Barrett's influence on a magic revival that King discusses is Frederick Hockley, who reprinted Barrett's book in 1870.
|-
|valign="top"|
* D. Michael Quinn. ''Early Mormonism and the Magic World View'', revised and enlarged edition, (Salt Lake City: Signature Books, 1998), 20, 84.
||
* {{FR-12-2-16}}
|-
|}
'''Commentary'''
* Quinn cites a work referring to an occult book that was not republished ''in England'' until fifty years after the publication of the Book of Mormon, yet does not inform the reader that this citation can have absolutely nothing to do with "early Mormonism."
<!--'''Resources'''
* InsertExtraResources-->
{{parabreak}}
{| valign="top" border="1" style="width:100%; font-size:85%"
!Quote used...!!The rest of the story...
|-
| style="width:50%" valign="top"| Quinn further claims that "Antoine Faivre has also emphasized Barrett's book in the general European revival of magic during the first decades of the 1800s." ||
In reality, rather than emphasizing it, Faivre mentions Barrett's book in one sentence, in passing: "a compilation destined to be a great success heralds the occult literature to come: ''The Magus'' (1801) by Francis Barrett."
|-
|valign="top"|
* D. Michael Quinn. ''Early Mormonism and the Magic World View'', revised and enlarged edition, (Salt Lake City: Signature Books, 1998), 20, 187.
||
* {{FR-12-2-16}}
|-
|}
'''Commentary'''
* Quinn distorts his source, and neglects to mention that the influence of ''The Magus'' would come well after Joseph Smith's early years in New England.
'''Resources'''
<!--'''Resources'''
* InsertExtraResources-->
{{parabreak}}
{| valign="top" border="1" style="width:100%; font-size:85%"
!Quote used...!!The rest of the story...
|-
| style="width:50%" valign="top"| "Moshe Idel wrote that the Zohar 'is manifestly anthropomorphic'." ||
"The latter [the lower sefirot] is an obvious anthropomorphic symbol, which in the Zohar refers to the second and lower divine head, that consisting of the Sefirah of Tiferet alone or of the Sefirot between Hokhmah and Yesod, whereas in the works of R. David [ben Yehudah he-Hasid, late thirteenth to early fourteenth centuries] it includes ten Sefirot or, as in the diagram, nine. In other contexts of R. David's thought, this configuration [of the diagram] is manifestly anthropomorphic; the fact that the concept appearing in the diagram differs from that of the Zohar does not obliterate its anthropomorphic character. . . . The process of [the mystical] visualization [of God] includes not only divine names, colors, and a circle or circles but also an anthropomorphic configuration symbolizing an aspect of the divine realm."
|-
|valign="top"|
* *D. Michael Quinn. ''Early Mormonism and the Magic World View'', revised and enlarged edition, (Salt Lake City: Signature Books, 1998), 298; citing Moshe Idel, ''Kabbalah: New Perspectives'' (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1988), 107.
||
*Moshe Idel, ''Kabbalah: New Perspectives'' (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1988), 107; cited in {{FR-12-2-16}}
|-
|}
'''Commentary'''
* Quinn wants to attribute Joseph's idea of God having a physical human form (anthropomorphism) to the Jewish mystics who practiced Kabbalah.  But, Quinn twists and distorts his source, which clearly states that the anthropomorphism of God is only allegorical in Kabbalah.
<!--'''Resources'''
* InsertExtraResources-->
{{parabreak}}


==About this work==
{{Epigraph|Quinn must have begun his research when he still had the Hofmann letters and the salamander to serve as the rock of his hypotheses. It was those solid, indisputable historical documents that would give credibility to the rest of his data and make his case come together....With the salamander letter and other Hofmann materials, Quinn had a respectable argument; without them he had a handful of fragmented and highly speculative research notes.<br>&mdash;{{BYUS|author=Stephen E. Robinson|article=Review of ''Early Mormonism and the Magic World View'', by D. Michael Quinn|vol=27|num=4|date=1987|start=94|end=95}}}}


{| valign="top" border="1" style="width:100%; font-size:85%"
{{Epigraph|...writers are certainly "dishonest or bad historians" if they fail to acknowledge the existence of even one piece of evidence they know challenges or contradicts the rest of their evidence. If this omission of relevant evidence is inadvertent, the author is careless. If the omission is an intentional effort to conceal or avoid presenting the reader with evidence that contradicts the preferred view of the writer, that is fraud, whether by a scholar or non-scholar, historian or other specialist. If authors write in scholarly style, they are equally dishonest if they fail to acknowledge any significant work whose interpretations differ from their own. <br>&mdash; D. Michael Quinn, "Editor's Introduction," in ''The New Mormon History: Revisionist Essays on the Past'', ed. D. Michael Quinn (Salt Lake City: Signature Books, 1992), xiii, n. 5}}
!Quote used...!!The rest of the story...
|-
| style="width:50%" valign="top"| "Gershom Scholem wrote of the Cabala's 'almost provocatively conspicuous anthropomorphism'" ||
Scholem notes that mystical descriptions of the body of God "[do] not imply that God in Himself possesses a physical form, but only that a form of this kind may be ascribed to 'the Glory.'”


And:
{{Epigraph|I have not checked every reference in Quinn's book, but every reference that I have checked has been inaccurate in some way. In some cases Quinn has misinterpreted the source. In some cases he proof texts the quotation, and a fuller reading of the text undermines his case. And sometimes he is just plain wrong.<br>&mdash;{{John Gee, "[https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/msr/?utm_source=scholarsarchive.byu.edu%2Fmsr%2Fvol12%2Fiss2%2F16&utm_medium=PDF&utm_campaign=PDFCoverPages Review of Early Mormonism and the Magic World View, revised and enlarged edition, by D. Michael Quinn]," ''FARMS Review of Books'' 12/2 (2000): 185–224 (footnote 23)}}}}


"''Adam Kadmon'' in the form of concentric circles" that "rearranged themselves as a line, in the form of a man and his limbs, though of course this must be understood in the purely spiritual sense of the incorporeal supernal lights."
==Reviews of this work==
|-
{{MaxwellInstituteBar
|valign="top"|
|link=https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/msr/vol12/iss2/16/
* *D. Michael Quinn. ''Early Mormonism and the Magic World View'', revised and enlarged edition, (Salt Lake City: Signature Books, 1998), 298; citing Gershom Scholem, ''Kabbalah'' (New York: Quadrangle, 1974), 141.
|title="An Obstacle to Deeper Understanding"
||
|author=John Gee
* {{FR-12-2-16}}; citing Gershom Scholem, ''Kabbalah'' (New York: Quadrangle, 1974), 17, 137
|publication=FARMS Review of Books
|-
|vol=12
|}
|num=2
'''Commentary'''
|date=2000
* Quinn again twists his source to make it appear as if Kabbalah has a literal, rather than allegorical, conception of God in a human form.
|summary=With the publication of the second edition of this work, therefore, the tone of Michael Quinn's writing takes on a distinctly defensive quality. He uses the opportunity to settle any scores with anyone he feels may have slighted,32 misrepresented, or criticized him in the past, particularly anyone who has ever viewed his work negatively. His hubris in this is, at times, breathtaking. Oddly, for a self-proclaimed "Mormon apologist," Quinn chose not to take issue with any of the anti-Mormons who have recognized his work as an attack on Joseph Smith and the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. (Does he agree with them?) On the other hand, anyone who has the temerity to question his infallibility is, in Quinn's view, ipso facto a "polemicist." To Quinn, accordingly, those who criticize him "don't mince words—they mince the truth" (p. x). They engage in "astonishing misreadings" (p. 334 n. 31; cf. 59), "distortions" (p. 337 n. 52), "dishonest polemics" (p. 341 n. 20), "intentional misrepresentation" (p. 334 n. 31), and a "religiously polemical campaign, not scholarly discourse" (p. 334 n. 31). (Ironically, these terms give a good description of Quinn's own work.) Quinn admits that if one of the reviewers whom he vociferously attacks had agreed with him, "I could regard him with compassion" (p. 403 n. 248). Thus those of us who do not subscribe to the dictum "When Michael Quinn speaks, the thinking has been done" will have to settle for being dismissed as "polemicists." He seems much like a soldier who, dazed in the battle, insists on attacking his comrades and is surprised that they consider him a traitor to the cause and treat him as such. Thus, in his second edition, if Quinn comes across as an apologist for anything, it is as an apologist for himself.
<!--'''Resources'''
}}
* InsertExtraResources-->
{{MaxwellInstituteBar
{{parabreak}}
|link=https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/msr/vol12/iss2/17/
|title=That Old Black Magic
|author=William J. Hamblin
|publication=FARMS Review of Books
|vol=12
|num=2
|date=2000
|summary=Quinn's overall thesis is that Joseph Smith and other early Latter-day Saint leaders were fundamentally influenced by occult and magical thought, books, and practices in the founding of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. This is unmitigated nonsense. Yet the fact that Quinn could not discover a single primary source written by Latter-day Saints that makes any positive statement about magic is hardly dissuasive to a historian of Quinn's inventive capacity.4 As we shall see, Quinn is quite capable of surmounting this dearth of evidence by sheer invention.
}}
{{MaxwellInstituteBar
|link=https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/msr/vol12/iss2/18/
|title=Writing History Must Not Be an Act of "Magic"
|author=Rhett S. James
|publication=FARMS Review of Books
|vol=12
|num=2
|date=2000
|summary=D Michael Quinn's revised and enlarged 1998 edition of Early Mormonism and the Magic World View makes its finest contribution as a resource about how selected Americans believed in "magic" within the complex of cultural varieties found in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. Quinn shows himself an energetic collector of information, and his magic corpus will be of interest to anthropologists and folklorists. Quinn's new 600-page edition includes 217 pages of notes, covering nearly as many pages as the main text and notes combined in his first 228-page edition. He increases the main body of his text by nearly one hundred pages and his introductory comments by more than a dozen pages. The 44 pages illustrating Mormon relics remain much the same but with improved reproduction. Quinn's style of presentation is tight, sometimes even compressed, and his tone is businesslike and sometimes to the point. Parts of some chapters read like essays, many of which can stand by themselves. His treatment of information is occasionally uneven and given to sweeping generalizations and speculations not supported by documentation. Sometimes his research is not thorough, which leads him into errors that could easily have been avoided.
}}
{{BYUStudiesBar
|link=https://byustudies.byu.edu/article/early-mormonism-and-the-magic-world-view-1/
|title=Review of ''Early Mormonism and the Magic World View'', by D. Michael Quinn
|author=Stephen E. Robinson
|vol=27
|num=4
|date=1987
|pages=88
|summary=In the past several years there has been a noticeably growing interest in alternative explanations for Mormon origins. Perhaps this is due to a certain lingering uneasiness that the present theories of cause are inadequate to explain the magnitude of the effects. At any rate, the most recent attempt to find a more satisfying explanation for Joseph Smith and the religion he founded is D. Michael Quinn's Early Mormonism and the Magic World View. The major strength of Quinn's book is the incredible breadth of its research. The bibliography appended to the main text is no less than sixty-seven pages in length and lists a multitude of arcane and often inaccessible volumes, including even rare medieval manuscripts. A second strength of the book for the non-Mormon reader is a total lack of any pro-Mormon bias. Although he is a Latter-day Saint, and despite his modest statement of faith in the introduction (xviii–xix), Quinn is clearly no LDS apologist. There is not a single page of the main text that would appear to be motivated by loyalty to the Church or its doctrines or to be apologetic of the Church's interests.
}}


==Further reading==
{{BYUStudiesBar
{{SpecificAuthorsAndWorks}}
|link=https://byustudies.byu.edu/article/early-mormonism-and-the-magic-world-view-3/
|title=Review of Michael Quinn, Mormonism and the Magic World View, 1st ed.
|author=Benson Whittle
|vol=27
|num=4
|date=Fall 1984
|summary=Magic is real; it works. Readers of Michael Quinn's new book must be prepared to accept this or never understand the argument. In the absence of direct experience, or of a scientific appreciation of magic, a kind of imaginative leap is probably advisable. We would need to walk into hilly, heavily wooded country interspersed with fields and roads, with head and heart wide open, trying in a most receptive way to realize that everything seen is materially connected to things invisible, and by these latter intermediaries to each other. It would be necessary to befriend and be befriended by witches, soothsayers, and magi and to take them seriously as friends and as divines. In so doing we might get glimpses of Joseph Smith, the young treasure-seer, his face buried in a hat which he holds upside-down in his hands, a stone in the bottom of it. We accept his seership, which eventually yields a treasure. We see the Smiths take up the hearthstones in their living room, enabling Joseph to conceal his find there. We watch as one disgruntled treasure-hunting colleague, Alva Beaman, demands to see or share the trove: taking up his divining rod, the resolute rustic promptly "witches" the whereabouts of the "golden plates." Everyone present shares something that Michael Quinn calls "the magic world view." All know that magic is real.
}}
{{BYUStudiesBar
|link=https://byustudies.byu.edu/article/early-mormonism-and-the-magic-world-view-2/
|title=Review of Michael Quinn, Mormonism and the Magic World View, 1st ed.
|author=William A. Wilson
|vol=27
|num=4
|date=Fall 1987
|summary=Because I know the circumstances surrounding the establishment of Mormonism only in a general way, I shall leave to the professional historian the task of commenting on those circumstances as they are presented by D. Michael Quinn in Early Mormonism and the Magic World View. In what follows, I shall discuss the book from the point of view of the general reader for whom Quinn says he intended the work and from the point of view of my own discipline, folklore.
}}

Latest revision as of 04:22, 12 May 2024


To learn more about responses to: D. Michael Quinn
Wiki links
Online
  • Duane Boyce, "'A Betrayal of Trust (Review of The Mormon Hierarchy: Extensions of Power, by D. Michael Quinn)'," FARMS Review 9/2 (1997). [147–163] link
  • John Gee, "'An Obstacle to Deeper Understanding' (Review of Early Mormonism and the Magic World View, revised and enlarged edition, by D. Michael Quinn)'," FARMS Review 12/2 (2001). [185–224] link
  • William J. Hamblin, "'That Old Black Magic (Review of Early Mormonism and the Magic World View, revised and enlarged edition, by D. Michael Quinn)'," FARMS Review 12/2 (2001). [225–394] link
  • Klaus J. Hansen, "Quinnspeak (Review of Same-Sex Dynamics among Nineteenth-Century Americans: A Mormon Example by D. Michael Quinn)," FARMS Review 10/1 (1998). [62–66] link
  • Gregory L. Smith, "Feet of Clay: Queer Theory and the Church of Jesus Christ," Interpreter: A Journal of Latter-day Saint Faith and Scholarship 43/3 (5 March 2021). [107–278] link
  • George L. Mitton and Rhett S. James, "A Response to D. Michael Quinn's Homosexual Distortion of Latter-day Saint History (Review of Same-Sex Dynamics among Nineteenth-Century Americans: A Mormon Example by D. Michael Quinn)," FARMS Review 10/1 (1998). [67–104] link
  • Rhett S. James, "'Writing History Must Not Be an Act of Magic (Review of Early Mormonism and the Magic World View, revised and enlarged edition, by D. Michael Quinn)'," FARMS Review 12/2 (2001). [395–414] link
  • Stephen D. Ricks and Daniel C. Peterson, “Joseph Smith and ‘Magic’: Methodological Reflections on the Use of a Term,” in Robert L. Millet, ed., To Be Learned Is Good If . . . (Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1987), 129–147.
  • Matthew Roper, "Unanswered Mormon Scholars (Review of Answering Mormon Scholars: A Response to Criticism Raised by Mormon Defenders)," FARMS Review of Books 9/1 (1997): 87–145. [{{{1}}} off-site] (page 87–145; see especially section "Joseph Smith and 'Magic'")
Navigators

Response to "Early Mormonism and the Magic World View"



A FAIR Analysis of: Early Mormonism and the Magic World View, a work by author: D. Michael Quinn

Response to claims made in Early Mormonism and the Magic World View by D. Michael Quinn


Jump to details:


Response to claims made in Early Mormonism and the Magic World View, "Chapter 1: Early America's Heritage of Religion and Magic"


Jump to details:


Response to claims made in Early Mormonism and the Magic World View, "Chapter 2: Divining Rods, Treasure-Digging, and Seer Stones"


Jump to details:


Response to claims made in Early Mormonism and the Magic World View, "Chapter 3: Ritual Magic, Astrology, Amulets, and Talismans"


Jump to details:


Response to claims made in Early Mormonism and the Magic World View, "Chapter 4: Magic Parchments and Occult Mentors"




Response to claims made in Early Mormonism and the Magic World View, "Chapter 5: Visions and the Coming Forth of the Book of Mormon"




Response to claims made in Early Mormonism and the Magic World View, "Chapter 6: Mormon Scriptures, the Magic World View, and Rural New York's Intellectual Life"


Jump to details:


Response to claims made in Early Mormonism and the Magic World View, "Chapter 7: The Persistence and Decline of Magic After 1830"


Jump to details:


Source Analysis, Sorted by Page Number



A FAIR Analysis of: Early Mormonism and the Magic World View, a work by author: D. Michael Quinn

21

Source interpretation
In an effort to show that books on magic were readily available on the frontier, the author makes some estimates. After estimating that a single book peddler "was selling about 25,000 books to farmers each year," the author then concludes that "by the early 1800’s there were thousands of peddlers." The author also claims that “‘some peddlers also stocked clandestine works’” and that therefore, “if local stores would not supply occult publications to American farmers, book peddlers were there to fill the need.”

Author's source(s)

Source Analysis
 FAIR WIKI EDITORS: Check sources


}}

26-27

Source interpretation
The author states that,

New York state's law provided punishment for "Disorderly Persons," whose definition included "all jugglers [conjurors], and all persons pretending to have skill in physiognomy, palmistry, or like crafty science, or pretending to tell fortunes, or to discover lost goods." (the amendation of "conjurors" is the author's)

Author's source(s)

Source Analysis
 FAIR WIKI EDITORS: Check sources


}}

182

Source interpretation
The author claims "bookstores near Joseph's home" in the 1820s were selling "thousands" of books that ranged from "44 cents to a dollar each."

Author's source(s)

Source Analysis
 FAIR WIKI EDITORS: Check sources


}}

298

Source interpretation
The author claims that Moshe Idel wrote that the Zohar 'is manifestly anthropomorphic', and that Gershom Scholem wrote of the Cabala's 'almost provocatively conspicuous anthropomorphism'.

Author's source(s)

Source Analysis
 FAIR WIKI EDITORS: Check sources


}}

The Author of Early Mormonism and the Magic World View and LDS apologetics



A FAIR Analysis of: Early Mormonism and the Magic World View, a work by author: D. Michael Quinn

Throughout the revised edition, the author often refers to the efforts of LDS apologetics related to his own works. He appears to have a particular issue with a review of the first edition of Early Mormonism and the Magic World View written by LDS scholar Bill Hamblin. This page addresses specific claims made by the author related to LDS apologetics.


47

The author(s) of Early Mormonism and the Magic World View make(s) the following claim:

The author claims that apologists "extend the broadest possible latitude to sources they agree with, yet impose the most stringent demands on sources of information the apologists dislike."

FAIR's Response

401

The author(s) of Early Mormonism and the Magic World View make(s) the following claim:

The author refers to "a deceptive statement by FARMS polemicist Louis Midgley" and refers to the "fundamental dishonesty" of his claim.

  • The author states, "In my opinion, Midgley is an LDS polemicist without scruples..."

    Author's sources:

  1. Midgley, "F.M. Brodie—'The Fasting Hermit and Very Saint of Ignorance': A Biographer and Her Legend," FARMS Review of Books, FARMS, 19967, no. 2:225n287.
  • Midgley, "Playing with Half a Decker: The Countercult Religious Tradition Confronts the Book of Mormon," Review of Books on the Book of Mormon, FARMS, 5:144n56 (1993).

FAIR's Response

  • The author is making a personal attack on Dr. Midgley—this is the type of behavior that critics often accuse FARMS of.
  • The statement that the author takes issue with is this:

There are no newspaper accounts, letters or diaries that hint that Joseph Smith as 'farm boy' was a 'treasure' seeker prior to the publication of such charges by Obadiah [sic] Dogberry (aka Abner Cole) beginning in June and July 1830."

  • The author claims that there is a "fundamental dishonesty" in the above statement because Dr. Midgley three years earlier had claimed to have read articles by Madsen, Wesley Walters, and Marvin Hill "about the manuscript documents of this 1826 court action against the treasure-seeking of Joseph Smith, the farm boy."


About this work

Quinn must have begun his research when he still had the Hofmann letters and the salamander to serve as the rock of his hypotheses. It was those solid, indisputable historical documents that would give credibility to the rest of his data and make his case come together....With the salamander letter and other Hofmann materials, Quinn had a respectable argument; without them he had a handful of fragmented and highly speculative research notes.
—Stephen E. Robinson, "Review of Early Mormonism and the Magic World View, by D. Michael Quinn," Brigham Young University Studies 27 no. 4 (1987), 94–95.

...writers are certainly "dishonest or bad historians" if they fail to acknowledge the existence of even one piece of evidence they know challenges or contradicts the rest of their evidence. If this omission of relevant evidence is inadvertent, the author is careless. If the omission is an intentional effort to conceal or avoid presenting the reader with evidence that contradicts the preferred view of the writer, that is fraud, whether by a scholar or non-scholar, historian or other specialist. If authors write in scholarly style, they are equally dishonest if they fail to acknowledge any significant work whose interpretations differ from their own.
— D. Michael Quinn, "Editor's Introduction," in The New Mormon History: Revisionist Essays on the Past, ed. D. Michael Quinn (Salt Lake City: Signature Books, 1992), xiii, n. 5

I have not checked every reference in Quinn's book, but every reference that I have checked has been inaccurate in some way. In some cases Quinn has misinterpreted the source. In some cases he proof texts the quotation, and a fuller reading of the text undermines his case. And sometimes he is just plain wrong.
—{{John Gee, "Review of Early Mormonism and the Magic World View, revised and enlarged edition, by D. Michael Quinn," FARMS Review of Books 12/2 (2000): 185–224 (footnote 23)}}

Reviews of this work

John Gee, ""An Obstacle to Deeper Understanding""

John Gee,  FARMS Review of Books, (2000)

With the publication of the second edition of this work, therefore, the tone of Michael Quinn's writing takes on a distinctly defensive quality. He uses the opportunity to settle any scores with anyone he feels may have slighted,32 misrepresented, or criticized him in the past, particularly anyone who has ever viewed his work negatively. His hubris in this is, at times, breathtaking. Oddly, for a self-proclaimed "Mormon apologist," Quinn chose not to take issue with any of the anti-Mormons who have recognized his work as an attack on Joseph Smith and the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. (Does he agree with them?) On the other hand, anyone who has the temerity to question his infallibility is, in Quinn's view, ipso facto a "polemicist." To Quinn, accordingly, those who criticize him "don't mince words—they mince the truth" (p. x). They engage in "astonishing misreadings" (p. 334 n. 31; cf. 59), "distortions" (p. 337 n. 52), "dishonest polemics" (p. 341 n. 20), "intentional misrepresentation" (p. 334 n. 31), and a "religiously polemical campaign, not scholarly discourse" (p. 334 n. 31). (Ironically, these terms give a good description of Quinn's own work.) Quinn admits that if one of the reviewers whom he vociferously attacks had agreed with him, "I could regard him with compassion" (p. 403 n. 248). Thus those of us who do not subscribe to the dictum "When Michael Quinn speaks, the thinking has been done" will have to settle for being dismissed as "polemicists." He seems much like a soldier who, dazed in the battle, insists on attacking his comrades and is surprised that they consider him a traitor to the cause and treat him as such. Thus, in his second edition, if Quinn comes across as an apologist for anything, it is as an apologist for himself.

Click here to view the complete article

William J. Hamblin, "That Old Black Magic"

William J. Hamblin,  FARMS Review of Books, (2000)

Quinn's overall thesis is that Joseph Smith and other early Latter-day Saint leaders were fundamentally influenced by occult and magical thought, books, and practices in the founding of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. This is unmitigated nonsense. Yet the fact that Quinn could not discover a single primary source written by Latter-day Saints that makes any positive statement about magic is hardly dissuasive to a historian of Quinn's inventive capacity.4 As we shall see, Quinn is quite capable of surmounting this dearth of evidence by sheer invention.

Click here to view the complete article

Rhett S. James, "Writing History Must Not Be an Act of "Magic""

Rhett S. James,  FARMS Review of Books, (2000)

D Michael Quinn's revised and enlarged 1998 edition of Early Mormonism and the Magic World View makes its finest contribution as a resource about how selected Americans believed in "magic" within the complex of cultural varieties found in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. Quinn shows himself an energetic collector of information, and his magic corpus will be of interest to anthropologists and folklorists. Quinn's new 600-page edition includes 217 pages of notes, covering nearly as many pages as the main text and notes combined in his first 228-page edition. He increases the main body of his text by nearly one hundred pages and his introductory comments by more than a dozen pages. The 44 pages illustrating Mormon relics remain much the same but with improved reproduction. Quinn's style of presentation is tight, sometimes even compressed, and his tone is businesslike and sometimes to the point. Parts of some chapters read like essays, many of which can stand by themselves. His treatment of information is occasionally uneven and given to sweeping generalizations and speculations not supported by documentation. Sometimes his research is not thorough, which leads him into errors that could easily have been avoided.

Click here to view the complete article

BYU Studies, "Review of Early Mormonism and the Magic World View, by D. Michael Quinn"

Stephen E. Robinson,  BYU Studies 27/4 (1987)

In the past several years there has been a noticeably growing interest in alternative explanations for Mormon origins. Perhaps this is due to a certain lingering uneasiness that the present theories of cause are inadequate to explain the magnitude of the effects. At any rate, the most recent attempt to find a more satisfying explanation for Joseph Smith and the religion he founded is D. Michael Quinn's Early Mormonism and the Magic World View. The major strength of Quinn's book is the incredible breadth of its research. The bibliography appended to the main text is no less than sixty-seven pages in length and lists a multitude of arcane and often inaccessible volumes, including even rare medieval manuscripts. A second strength of the book for the non-Mormon reader is a total lack of any pro-Mormon bias. Although he is a Latter-day Saint, and despite his modest statement of faith in the introduction (xviii–xix), Quinn is clearly no LDS apologist. There is not a single page of the main text that would appear to be motivated by loyalty to the Church or its doctrines or to be apologetic of the Church's interests.

Click here to view the complete article

BYU Studies, "Review of Michael Quinn, Mormonism and the Magic World View, 1st ed."

Benson Whittle,  BYU Studies 27/4 (Fall 1984)

Magic is real; it works. Readers of Michael Quinn's new book must be prepared to accept this or never understand the argument. In the absence of direct experience, or of a scientific appreciation of magic, a kind of imaginative leap is probably advisable. We would need to walk into hilly, heavily wooded country interspersed with fields and roads, with head and heart wide open, trying in a most receptive way to realize that everything seen is materially connected to things invisible, and by these latter intermediaries to each other. It would be necessary to befriend and be befriended by witches, soothsayers, and magi and to take them seriously as friends and as divines. In so doing we might get glimpses of Joseph Smith, the young treasure-seer, his face buried in a hat which he holds upside-down in his hands, a stone in the bottom of it. We accept his seership, which eventually yields a treasure. We see the Smiths take up the hearthstones in their living room, enabling Joseph to conceal his find there. We watch as one disgruntled treasure-hunting colleague, Alva Beaman, demands to see or share the trove: taking up his divining rod, the resolute rustic promptly "witches" the whereabouts of the "golden plates." Everyone present shares something that Michael Quinn calls "the magic world view." All know that magic is real.

Click here to view the complete article

BYU Studies, "Review of Michael Quinn, Mormonism and the Magic World View, 1st ed."

William A. Wilson,  BYU Studies 27/4 (Fall 1987)

Because I know the circumstances surrounding the establishment of Mormonism only in a general way, I shall leave to the professional historian the task of commenting on those circumstances as they are presented by D. Michael Quinn in Early Mormonism and the Magic World View. In what follows, I shall discuss the book from the point of view of the general reader for whom Quinn says he intended the work and from the point of view of my own discipline, folklore.

Click here to view the complete article