Difference between revisions of "Criticism of Mormonism/Books/Blood of the Prophets: Brigham Young and the Massacre at Mountain Meadows/Use of sources/Double standard: violence in immigrants"

m (GLSBot: Adding footers to all articles)
m
 
(16 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Articles FAIR copyright}} {{Articles Header 1}} {{Articles Header 2}} {{Articles Header 3}} {{Articles Header 4}} {{Articles Header 5}} {{Articles Header 6}} {{Articles Header 7}} {{Articles Header 8}} {{Articles Header 9}} {{Articles Header 10}}
+
{{Main Page}}
__NOTOC__
+
{{H1
{{FAIRAnalysisHeader
+
|L=Criticism of Mormonism/Books/Blood of the Prophets: Brigham Young and the Massacre at Mountain Meadows/Use of sources/Double standard: violence in immigrants
|title=[[../../]]
+
|H=Use of sources: Double standard - violence in immigrants
|author=Will Bagley
+
|S=
|noauthor=
+
|L1=
|section=[[../../Use of sources|Use of sources]], Double standard: violence among the immigrants
+
|T=[[../../|Blood of the Prophets: Brigham Young and the Massacre at Mountain Meadows]]
|previous=[[../Unpardonable sin|Unpardonable sin]]
+
|A=Will Bagley
|next=[[../William W. Drummond and murders‎|William W. Drummond and murders‎]]
+
|<=[[../Unpardonable sin|Unpardonable sin]]
|notes={{AuthorsDisclaimer}}
+
|>=[[../William W. Drummond and murders‎|William W. Drummond and murders‎]]
 
}}
 
}}
  
=={{Criticism label}}==
+
<onlyinclude>Critics are inconsistent in their treatment of the supposedly violent society in Utah when compared to the massacred immigrants.
* Critics are inconsistent in their treatment of the supposedly violent society in Utah when compared to the massacred immigrants.
 
  
==={{Criticism source label English}}===
+
This represents a clear double standard on the part of the author, and intent to slant the narrative to condemn the Mormons, rather than understand the period.
* {{CriticalWork:Bagley:Blood of the Prophets|pages=58, 63}}
 
  
=={{Response label}}==
+
As one reviewer noted:
  
As one reviewer noted:
+
<blockquote>
 +
After arguing for the idea of Utah as an institutionally violent society, in what seems a non sequitur, Bagley refuses to believe that any of the stories of conflicts between the Mormon settlers and the Fancher-Baker migrants, except those over herd grounds, have any value. He acknowledges that both Alexander Fancher, who served as a private in a "border-land vendetta" (58) and John "Jack" Baker, who "apparently did kill a few of his neighbors" (63) had violent backgrounds. Nevertheless, he whitewashes those admissions with the rhetorical device of inserting a chapter of idyllic prose on the families of the Arkansas emigrants. He provides no similar idyllic treatment of Mormon family life. <ref>{{BYUS1|author=Thomas G. Alexander|article=Review of ''Blood of the Prophets: Brigham Young and the Massacre at Mountain Meadows''|date=January 2003|vol=31|num=1|start=167&ndash;}} {{link|url=http://byustudies.byu.edu/Reviews/Pages/reviewdetail.aspx?reviewID=99}}
 +
</ref>
 +
</blockquote>
  
:After arguing for the idea of Utah as an institutionally violent society, in what seems a non sequitur, Bagley refuses to believe that any of the stories of conflicts between the Mormon settlers and the Fancher-Baker migrants, except those over herd grounds, have any value. He acknowledges that both Alexander Fancher, who served as a private in a "border-land vendetta" (58) and John "Jack" Baker, who "apparently did kill a few of his neighbors" (63) had violent backgrounds. Nevertheless, he whitewashes those admissions with the rhetorical device of inserting a chapter of idyllic prose on the families of the Arkansas emigrants. He provides no similar idyllic treatment of Mormon family life.{{ref|alexander.1}}
+
While this does no credit to the work under review, this is no way means that the immigrants "deserved" the treatment that they got from their murderers. The Mormons, however, do not deserve the one-sided treatment they receive from this historian either.
  
This represents a clear double standard on the part of the author, and intent to slant the narrative to condemn the Mormons, rather than understand the period.
+
</onlyinclude>
  
While this does no credit to the work under review, this is no way means that the immigrants "deserved" the treatment that they got from their murderers.  The Mormons, however, do not deserve the one-sided treatment they receive from this historian either.
 
  
=={{Endnotes label}}==
+
{{Critical sources box:Criticism of Mormonism/Books/Blood of the Prophets: Brigham Young and the Massacre at Mountain Meadows/Use of sources/Double standard: violence in immigrants/CriticalSources}}
 +
{{endnotes sources}}
  
#{{note|alexander.1}} {{BYUS1|author=Thomas G. Alexander|article=Review of ''Blood of the Prophets: Brigham Young and the Massacre at Mountain Meadows''|date=January 2003|vol=31|num=1|start=167&ndash;}} {{link|url=http://byustudies.byu.edu/Reviews/Pages/reviewdetail.aspx?reviewID=99}}
 
  
=Further reading=
 
{{FAIRAnalysisWiki}}
 
{{Articles Footer 1}} {{Articles Footer 2}} {{Articles Footer 3}} {{Articles Footer 4}} {{Articles Footer 5}} {{Articles Footer 6}} {{Articles Footer 7}} {{Articles Footer 8}} {{Articles Footer 9}} {{Articles Footer 10}}
 
  
 +
<!-- PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
[[Category:Mountain Meadows Massacre|Reviews]]
 
[[Category:Mountain Meadows Massacre|Reviews]]
 
[[fr:Specific works/Blood of the Prophets: Brigham Young and the Massacre at Mountain Meadows/Use of sources/Double standard: violence in immigrants]]
 

Latest revision as of 17:22, 30 April 2024

Use of sources: Double standard - violence in immigrants



A FAIR Analysis of: Blood of the Prophets: Brigham Young and the Massacre at Mountain Meadows, a work by author: Will Bagley

Critics are inconsistent in their treatment of the supposedly violent society in Utah when compared to the massacred immigrants.

This represents a clear double standard on the part of the author, and intent to slant the narrative to condemn the Mormons, rather than understand the period.

As one reviewer noted:

After arguing for the idea of Utah as an institutionally violent society, in what seems a non sequitur, Bagley refuses to believe that any of the stories of conflicts between the Mormon settlers and the Fancher-Baker migrants, except those over herd grounds, have any value. He acknowledges that both Alexander Fancher, who served as a private in a "border-land vendetta" (58) and John "Jack" Baker, who "apparently did kill a few of his neighbors" (63) had violent backgrounds. Nevertheless, he whitewashes those admissions with the rhetorical device of inserting a chapter of idyllic prose on the families of the Arkansas emigrants. He provides no similar idyllic treatment of Mormon family life. [1]

While this does no credit to the work under review, this is no way means that the immigrants "deserved" the treatment that they got from their murderers. The Mormons, however, do not deserve the one-sided treatment they receive from this historian either.



Source(s) of the criticism
Critical sources

Notes

  1. Thomas G. Alexander, "Review of Blood of the Prophets: Brigham Young and the Massacre at Mountain Meadows," Brigham Young University Studies 31 no. 1 (January 2003), 167–. off-site