Difference between revisions of "Criticism of Mormonism/Books/By His Own Hand upon Papyrus: A New Look at the Joseph Smith Papyri/Larson "restoration" of Facsimile 1"

(Hand versus bird wing: mod)
(Hand versus bird wing: mod)
Line 16: Line 16:
 
*The two hands have distinct thumbs.
 
*The two hands have distinct thumbs.
 
*The assumption that ink spots on the hand represent spots on the birds wing is disproven by close examination of the original, which shows ink traces that indicated that the lines were originally connected. It is also clear that the missing ink correlates with cracks in the papyri.
 
*The assumption that ink spots on the hand represent spots on the birds wing is disproven by close examination of the original, which shows ink traces that indicated that the lines were originally connected. It is also clear that the missing ink correlates with cracks in the papyri.
 +
*Note that the index finger (the one next to the thumb) is continuous in the original, but was broken into two parts in the Larson restoration.
  
 
[[File:Larson.restoration.comparison.to.original.hand.detail.1.jpg|1000px]]
 
[[File:Larson.restoration.comparison.to.original.hand.detail.1.jpg|1000px]]

Revision as of 19:48, 15 March 2013

  1. REDIRECTTemplate:Test3


A FAIR Analysis of:
By His Own Hand upon Papyrus: A New Look at the Joseph Smith Papyri
A work by author: Charles Larson

An analysis of the Charles M. Larson restoration of Facsimile 1 compared against the original papyrus

Hand versus bird wing

The Larson restoration presumes that the upper hand represented in Facsimile 1 is instead the wing of a bird. There are several elements which disprove this.

  • It is clear that the Egyptian artist drew wings in a specific manner, as can be observed by the wing of the bird on the right.
  • The two hands have distinct thumbs.
  • The assumption that ink spots on the hand represent spots on the birds wing is disproven by close examination of the original, which shows ink traces that indicated that the lines were originally connected. It is also clear that the missing ink correlates with cracks in the papyri.
  • Note that the index finger (the one next to the thumb) is continuous in the original, but was broken into two parts in the Larson restoration.

Larson.restoration.comparison.to.original.hand.detail.1.jpg

Clothing on the reclining figure

Head of the priest