Difference between revisions of "Criticism of Mormonism/Online documents/Letter to a CES Director"

(Detailed responses by section are found in linked subarticles below: mod)
(Detailed responses by section are found in linked subarticles below: test)
Line 48: Line 48:
 
|link=Criticism of Mormonism/Online documents/Letter to a CES Director/Book of Mormon Concerns & Questions  
 
|link=Criticism of Mormonism/Online documents/Letter to a CES Director/Book of Mormon Concerns & Questions  
 
|subject=Response to section "Book of Mormon Concerns & Questions"  
 
|subject=Response to section "Book of Mormon Concerns & Questions"  
|summary=The author asks why italicized text and errors from the King James Bible are present in the Book of Mormon. He also briefly discusses anachronisms, archaeology, and a theory that the Book of Mormon place names actually originated in the area around New York. The "View of the Hebrews" theory of Book of Mormon authorship is discussed.
+
|summary=The author asks why italicized text and errors from the King James Bible are present in the Book of Mormon. He also briefly discusses anachronisms, archaeology, and a theory that the Book of Mormon place names actually originated in the area around New York. The "View of the Hebrews" theory of Book of Mormon authorship is discussed. {{NumberComplete|num=8|total=10}}
}}{{NumberComplete|num=8|total=10}}
+
}}
 
{{SummaryItem
 
{{SummaryItem
 
|link=Criticism of Mormonism/Online documents/Letter to a CES Director/Book of Mormon Translation Concerns & Questions
 
|link=Criticism of Mormonism/Online documents/Letter to a CES Director/Book of Mormon Translation Concerns & Questions
Line 68: Line 68:
 
|link=Criticism of Mormonism/Online documents/Letter to a CES Director/Polygamy & Polyandry Concerns & Questions
 
|link=Criticism of Mormonism/Online documents/Letter to a CES Director/Polygamy & Polyandry Concerns & Questions
 
|subject=Response to section "Polygamy/Polyandry Concerns & Questions"
 
|subject=Response to section "Polygamy/Polyandry Concerns & Questions"
|summary=Regarding Joseph's practice of polygamy, the author states that "Joseph Smith’s pattern of behavior or modus operandi for a period of at least 10 years of his adult life was to keep secrets, be deceptive, and be dishonest – both privately and publicly."
+
|summary=Regarding Joseph's practice of polygamy, the author states that "Joseph Smith’s pattern of behavior or modus operandi for a period of at least 10 years of his adult life was to keep secrets, be deceptive, and be dishonest – both privately and publicly." {{NumberComplete|num=1|total=5}}
}}{{NumberComplete|num=1|total=5}}
+
}}
 
{{SummaryItem
 
{{SummaryItem
 
|link=Criticism of Mormonism/Online documents/Letter to a CES Director/Prophets Concerns & Questions
 
|link=Criticism of Mormonism/Online documents/Letter to a CES Director/Prophets Concerns & Questions
Line 83: Line 83:
 
|link=Criticism of Mormonism/Online documents/Letter to a CES Director/Testimony & Spiritual Witness Concerns & Questions
 
|link=Criticism of Mormonism/Online documents/Letter to a CES Director/Testimony & Spiritual Witness Concerns & Questions
 
|subject=Response to section "Testimony/Spiritual Witness Concerns & Questions"
 
|subject=Response to section "Testimony/Spiritual Witness Concerns & Questions"
|summary=The author asks the question, "Why is this Spirit so unreliable and inconsistent?  How can I trust such an inconsistent and contradictory Source for knowing that Mormonism is worth betting my life, time, money, heart, mind, and obedience to?"
+
|summary=The author asks the question, "Why is this Spirit so unreliable and inconsistent?  How can I trust such an inconsistent and contradictory Source for knowing that Mormonism is worth betting my life, time, money, heart, mind, and obedience to?" {{NumberComplete|num=4|total=9}}
}}{{NumberComplete|num=4|total=9}}
+
}}
 
{{SummaryItem
 
{{SummaryItem
 
|link=Criticism of Mormonism/Online documents/Letter to a CES Director/Priesthood Restoration Concerns & Questions
 
|link=Criticism of Mormonism/Online documents/Letter to a CES Director/Priesthood Restoration Concerns & Questions
Line 93: Line 93:
 
|link=Criticism of Mormonism/Online documents/Letter to a CES Director/Witnesses Concerns & Questions
 
|link=Criticism of Mormonism/Online documents/Letter to a CES Director/Witnesses Concerns & Questions
 
|subject=Response to section "Witnesses Concerns & Questions"
 
|subject=Response to section "Witnesses Concerns & Questions"
|summary=Regarding the witnesses to the Book of Mormon, the author states, "At the end of the day?  It all doesn’t matter.  The Book of Mormon Witnesses and their testimonies of the gold plates are irrelevant.  It does not matter whether eleven 19th century treasure diggers with magical worldviews saw some gold plates or not.  It doesn’t matter because of this one simple fact: Joseph did not use the gold plates for translating the Book of Mormon."
+
|summary=Regarding the witnesses to the Book of Mormon, the author states, "At the end of the day?  It all doesn’t matter.  The Book of Mormon Witnesses and their testimonies of the gold plates are irrelevant.  It does not matter whether eleven 19th century treasure diggers with magical worldviews saw some gold plates or not.  It doesn’t matter because of this one simple fact: Joseph did not use the gold plates for translating the Book of Mormon." {{NumberComplete|num=5|total=9}}
}}{{NumberComplete|num=5|total=9}}
+
}}
 
{{SummaryItem
 
{{SummaryItem
 
|link=Criticism of Mormonism/Online documents/Letter to a CES Director/Temples & Freemasonry Concerns & Questions
 
|link=Criticism of Mormonism/Online documents/Letter to a CES Director/Temples & Freemasonry Concerns & Questions
Line 103: Line 103:
 
|link=Criticism of Mormonism/Online documents/Letter to a CES Director/Science Concerns & Questions
 
|link=Criticism of Mormonism/Online documents/Letter to a CES Director/Science Concerns & Questions
 
|subject=Response to section "Science Concerns & Questions"
 
|subject=Response to section "Science Concerns & Questions"
|summary=The author concludes that "The problem Mormonism encounters is that so many of its claims are well within the realm of scientific study, and as such, can be proven or disproven.  To cling to faith in these areas, where the overwhelming evidence is against it, is willful ignorance, not spiritual dedication."
+
|summary=The author concludes that "The problem Mormonism encounters is that so many of its claims are well within the realm of scientific study, and as such, can be proven or disproven.  To cling to faith in these areas, where the overwhelming evidence is against it, is willful ignorance, not spiritual dedication." {{NumberComplete|num=2|total=10}}
}}{{NumberComplete|num=2|total=10}}
+
}}
 
{{SummaryItem
 
{{SummaryItem
 
|link=Criticism of Mormonism/Online documents/Letter to a CES Director/Scriptures Concerns & Questions
 
|link=Criticism of Mormonism/Online documents/Letter to a CES Director/Scriptures Concerns & Questions
 
|subject=Response to section "Scriptures Concerns & Questions"
 
|subject=Response to section "Scriptures Concerns & Questions"
|summary=The author states that "To believe in the scriptures, I have to believe in a god who endorsed murder, genocide, infanticide, rape, slavery, selling daughters into sex slavery, polygamy, child abuse, stoning disobedient children, pillage, plunder, sexism, racism, human sacrifice, animal sacrifice, killing people who work on the Sabbath, death penalty for those who mix cotton with polyester, and so on."
+
|summary=The author states that "To believe in the scriptures, I have to believe in a god who endorsed murder, genocide, infanticide, rape, slavery, selling daughters into sex slavery, polygamy, child abuse, stoning disobedient children, pillage, plunder, sexism, racism, human sacrifice, animal sacrifice, killing people who work on the Sabbath, death penalty for those who mix cotton with polyester, and so on." {{NumberComplete|num=1|total=9}}
}}{{NumberComplete|num=1|total=9}}
+
}}
 
{{SummaryItem
 
{{SummaryItem
 
|link=Criticism of Mormonism/Online documents/Letter to a CES Director/Other Concerns & Questions
 
|link=Criticism of Mormonism/Online documents/Letter to a CES Director/Other Concerns & Questions
 
|subject=Response to section "Other Concerns & Questions"
 
|subject=Response to section "Other Concerns & Questions"
|summary=The author notes that, "Under [Quentin L.] Cook’s counsel, FAIR and unofficial LDS apologetic websites are anti-Mormon sources that should be avoided.  Not only do they introduce to Mormons 'internet materials that magnify, exaggerate, and in some cases invent shortcomings of early Church leaders' but they provide many ridiculous answers with logical fallacies and omissions while leaving members confused and hanging with a bizarre version of Mormonism."
+
|summary=The author notes that, "Under [Quentin L.] Cook’s counsel, FAIR and unofficial LDS apologetic websites are anti-Mormon sources that should be avoided.  Not only do they introduce to Mormons 'internet materials that magnify, exaggerate, and in some cases invent shortcomings of early Church leaders' but they provide many ridiculous answers with logical fallacies and omissions while leaving members confused and hanging with a bizarre version of Mormonism." {{NumberComplete|num=10|total=13}}
}}{{NumberComplete|num=10|total=13}}
+
}}
 
{{SummaryItem
 
{{SummaryItem
 
|link=Criticism of Mormonism/Online documents/Letter to a CES Director/Conclusion
 
|link=Criticism of Mormonism/Online documents/Letter to a CES Director/Conclusion
 
|subject=Response to section "Conclusion"
 
|subject=Response to section "Conclusion"
|summary=The author concludes, "FAIR and these unofficial apologists have done more to destroy my testimony than any anti-Mormon source ever could.  I found their version of Mormonism to be alien and foreign to the Chapel Mormonism that I grew up in attending Church, seminary, reading scriptures, General Conferences, EFY, mission, and BYU.  Their answers are not only contradictory to the scriptures and teachings I learned through correlated Mormonism…they’re truly bizarre."
+
|summary=The author concludes, "FAIR and these unofficial apologists have done more to destroy my testimony than any anti-Mormon source ever could.  I found their version of Mormonism to be alien and foreign to the Chapel Mormonism that I grew up in attending Church, seminary, reading scriptures, General Conferences, EFY, mission, and BYU.  Their answers are not only contradictory to the scriptures and teachings I learned through correlated Mormonism…they’re truly bizarre." {{NumberComplete|num=1|total=unknown}}
}}{{NumberComplete|num=1|total=1}}
+
}}
  
 
==References==
 
==References==

Revision as of 13:50, 17 July 2013

  1. REDIRECTTemplate:Test3



A FAIR Analysis of:
Letter to a CES Director
High Level Summary
Title Letter to a CES Director
Type Online document
Author(s) The author uses his real name in the actual letter (withheld here at his request); he posts on the ex-Mormon subreddit as "kolobot".
Affiliation According to the author, he is "a disaffected member who lost his testimony."
Accuracy The letter presents a host of troubling issues in the form of questions. The author states that "I’m hoping you’re going to have better answers than many of the ones given by unofficial apologists such as FAIR and Neal Maxwell Institute (formerly FARMS)."
Temple content

A FAIR Analysis of "A Letter to a CES Director: Why I Lost My Testimony"

I didn't write this for the CES guy. I'm not under any illusion that I'm going to change his mind. It's not going to happen. I wrote this for my kids who one day are going to ask their dad why he left the faith. (The author of "A Letter to a CES Director" April 23, 2013) [1]
Dear Elder Cook. . . .You get the picture. I used to believe a lot of vicious lies, all of which are found in LDS or LDS-friendly sources I read about on the evil internetz. I guess these LDS and LDS-friendly sources are anti-Mormon too. But thanks to your talk, I repented. And now I know the truth: official LDS and LDS-friendly sources on the evil internetz tell lots and lots of lies about Joseph Smith, Brigham Young, the First Vision, the Book of Mormon and everything else you can think of about the Lord's church. Thanks for encouraging me to repent of my disillusionment and bringing me back to the fold. We should ban Rough Stone Rolling, edit Joseph's journals, delete part of the History of the Church, delete part of the Journal of Discourses, revise FamilySearch.org, correct Elder Nelson's 1993 talk and distance ourselves from FARMS publications. We must remove and stop these absurd and outrageous lies that led me astray in the first place. (The author of "A Letter to a CES Director" in his October 9, 2012 "open letter" to Elder Quentin Cook.) [2]
∗       ∗       ∗

Overview

The "Letter to a CES Director" is a new online document which has become popular among ex-Mormons. This document is hosted on a number of critical websites. The PDF version of the letter may be downloaded here: http://cesletter.com/

The letter contains many of the typical elements of the ex-Mormon "exit story." The author starts out with a reasonable tone: "I’m interested in your thoughts and answers as I have been unable to find official answers from the Church for most of these issues," but then immediately gives an indication that the writer doesn't actually expect any new information, "I’m hoping you’re going to have better answers than many of the ones given by unofficial apologists such as FAIR and Neal Maxwell Institute (formerly FARMS)." A common theme on ex-Mormon boards is that the answers to these questions must come from "official" Church sources and not "unofficial" sources such as FAIR or the Maxwell Institute.

To the writer's credit, he gives his real name. He continues, "Obviously I’m a disaffected member who lost his testimony so it’s no secret which side I’m on at the moment. All this information is a result of over a year of intense research and an absolute rabid obsession with Joseph Smith and Church history. With this said, I’d be pretty arrogant and ignorant to say that I have all the information and that you don’t have answers."

The author claims that his "triggering event" was a statement by Church Historian Marlin Jensen: "In February of 2012, I was reading the news online when I came across the following news article: Mormons Besieged by the Modern Age. In the article was information about a Q&A meeting at Utah State University that LDS Church Historian and General Authority, Elder Marlin Jensen gave in late 2011. He was asked his thoughts regarding the effects of Google on membership and people who are “leaving in droves” over Church history. Elder Marlin’s response: 'Maybe since Kirtland, we’ve never had a period of – I’ll call it apostasy, like we’re having now; largely over these issues…'"

The author then states that he "started doing research and reading books like LDS historian and scholar Richard Bushman’s “Rough Stone Rolling” and many others to try to better understand what was happening." However, when one looks at the list of issues that follows, it is evident that much of this research actually came from a variety of critical websites. The author actually acknowledges this online: "I stand on the shoulders of giants and all I've done was compiled many of their work[s] and put it in my own style and narrative." [3]

A long list of issues follows, with the author beginning to adopt an increasingly sarcastic tone. "The problem with this is that the crazy god of the Old Testament was Jehovah. Who’s Jehovah? The premortal Jesus Christ. So, Christ is the crazy god of the Old Testament. The Christ of the Old Testament and the Christ of the New Testament are light years different. Again, I’m asked to believe in not only a part-time racist god and a part-time polygamous god but a part-time psychopathic schizophrenic one as well."

The author ultimately concludes that "There are just way too many problems. We’re not just talking about one issue here. We’re talking about dozens of serious issues that undermine the very foundation of the LDS Church and its truth claims."

The author has promised a response to FAIR's analysis. We will update when that information becomes available.

Detailed responses by section are found in linked subarticles below

Response to section "Book of Mormon Concerns & Questions"

Summary: The author asks why italicized text and errors from the King James Bible are present in the Book of Mormon. He also briefly discusses anachronisms, archaeology, and a theory that the Book of Mormon place names actually originated in the area around New York. The "View of the Hebrews" theory of Book of Mormon authorship is discussed.  [Work in progress. 8 out of 10 items completed]

Response to section "Book of Mormon Translation Concerns & Questions"

Summary: The author of the letter asks, "Why is the Church not being honest and transparent to its members about how Joseph Smith really translated the Book of Mormon? How am I supposed to be okay with this deception?"

Response to section "First Vision Concerns & Questions"

Summary: The author states, "Like the rock in the hat story, I did not know there were multiple First Vision accounts. I did not know its contradictions or that the Church members didn’t know about a First Vision until 22 years after it supposedly happened. I was unaware of these omissions in the mission field as I was never taught or trained in the Missionary Training Center to teach investigators these facts."

Response to section "Book of Abraham Concerns & Questions"

Summary: The author notes that, "Egyptologists have found the source material for the Book of Abraham to be nothing more than a common pagan Egyptian funerary text for a deceased man named “Hor” in 1st century AD. In other words, it was a common Breathing Permit that the Egyptians buried with their dead. It has absolutely nothing to do with Abraham or anything Joseph claimed in his translation for the Book of Abraham."

Response to section "Polygamy/Polyandry Concerns & Questions"

Summary: Regarding Joseph's practice of polygamy, the author states that "Joseph Smith’s pattern of behavior or modus operandi for a period of at least 10 years of his adult life was to keep secrets, be deceptive, and be dishonest – both privately and publicly."  [Work in progress. 1 out of 5 items completed]

Response to section "Prophets Concerns & Questions"

Summary: The author expresses concern about changes in doctrine. For example, "As a believing member, I had no idea that Joseph Smith gave the priesthood to black men. I’m supposed to go to the drawing board now and believe in a god who is not only a schizophrenic racist but who is inconsistent as well? Again, yesterday’s doctrine is today’s false doctrine. Yesterday’s 10 prophets are today’s heretics."

Response to section "Kinderhook Plates and Translator/Seer Claims Concerns & Questions"

Summary: The author claims that, "Joseph Smith made a scientific claim that he could translate ancient documents. This is a testable claim. Joseph failed the test with the Book of Abraham. He failed the test with the Kinderhook Plates."

Response to section "Testimony/Spiritual Witness Concerns & Questions"

Summary: The author asks the question, "Why is this Spirit so unreliable and inconsistent? How can I trust such an inconsistent and contradictory Source for knowing that Mormonism is worth betting my life, time, money, heart, mind, and obedience to?"  [Work in progress. 4 out of 9 items completed]

Response to section "Priesthood Restoration Concerns & Questions"

Summary: The author states, "Like the First Vision story, none of the members of the Church or Joseph Smith’s family had ever heard prior to 1834 about a priesthood restoration from John the Baptist or Peter, James, and John. Although the priesthood is now taught to have been restored in 1829, Joseph and Oliver made no such claim until 1834. Why did it take five years for Joseph or Oliver to tell members of the Church about the priesthood?"

Response to section "Witnesses Concerns & Questions"

Summary: Regarding the witnesses to the Book of Mormon, the author states, "At the end of the day? It all doesn’t matter. The Book of Mormon Witnesses and their testimonies of the gold plates are irrelevant. It does not matter whether eleven 19th century treasure diggers with magical worldviews saw some gold plates or not. It doesn’t matter because of this one simple fact: Joseph did not use the gold plates for translating the Book of Mormon."  [Work in progress. 5 out of 9 items completed]

Response to section "Temples & Freemasonry Concerns & Questions"

Summary: The author of the letter asks, "Does the eternal salvation, eternal happiness, and eternal sealings of families really depend on medieval originated Masonic rituals in multi-million dollar castles? Is God really going to separate good couples and their children who love one other and who want to be together in the next life because they object to uncomfortable and strange Masonic temple rituals and a polygamous heaven?" We respond to these questions in this article.

Response to section "Science Concerns & Questions"

Summary: The author concludes that "The problem Mormonism encounters is that so many of its claims are well within the realm of scientific study, and as such, can be proven or disproven. To cling to faith in these areas, where the overwhelming evidence is against it, is willful ignorance, not spiritual dedication."  [Work in progress. 2 out of 10 items completed]

Response to section "Scriptures Concerns & Questions"

Summary: The author states that "To believe in the scriptures, I have to believe in a god who endorsed murder, genocide, infanticide, rape, slavery, selling daughters into sex slavery, polygamy, child abuse, stoning disobedient children, pillage, plunder, sexism, racism, human sacrifice, animal sacrifice, killing people who work on the Sabbath, death penalty for those who mix cotton with polyester, and so on."  [Work in progress. 1 out of 9 items completed]

Response to section "Other Concerns & Questions"

Summary: The author notes that, "Under [Quentin L.] Cook’s counsel, FAIR and unofficial LDS apologetic websites are anti-Mormon sources that should be avoided. Not only do they introduce to Mormons 'internet materials that magnify, exaggerate, and in some cases invent shortcomings of early Church leaders' but they provide many ridiculous answers with logical fallacies and omissions while leaving members confused and hanging with a bizarre version of Mormonism."  [Work in progress. 10 out of 13 items completed]

Response to section "Conclusion"

Summary: The author concludes, "FAIR and these unofficial apologists have done more to destroy my testimony than any anti-Mormon source ever could. I found their version of Mormonism to be alien and foreign to the Chapel Mormonism that I grew up in attending Church, seminary, reading scriptures, General Conferences, EFY, mission, and BYU. Their answers are not only contradictory to the scriptures and teachings I learned through correlated Mormonism…they’re truly bizarre."  [Work in progress. 1 out of unknown items completed]

References

  1. [note] Posted as "kolobot" on the ex-Mormon subreddit, October 9, 2012.
  2. [note] Posted as "kolobot" on the ex-Mormon subreddit, April 23, 2013.
  3. [note] Posted as "kolobot" on the ex-Mormon subreddit, March 26, 2013.