Array

Criticism of Mormonism/Books/One Nation Under Gods/Use of sources/Calling All Mormon Scholars: Difference between revisions

mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 10: Line 10:
}}
}}
In edits; editors can click edit to see current text.
In edits; editors can click edit to see current text.
<!--
=Calling All Mormon Scholars=
=Calling All Mormon Scholars=
==The Quote==
==The Quote==
Line 17: Line 16:


===''One Nation under Gods'', page ix (paperback)===
===''One Nation under Gods'', page ix (paperback)===
According to Allen Roberts, a Mormon '''architectural history''' scholar, LDS leaders do indeed "attempt to control depictions of the Mormon past."5 {{ea}}
According to Allen Roberts, a Mormon '''architectural history''' scholar, LDS leaders do indeed "attempt to control depictions of the Mormon past." {{ea}}


==The Reference==
==The Reference==
Line 26: Line 25:
There are any number of people—the author included—who insist that the LDS Church is biased, wrong, dishonest, and misleading because it won't publish a history that tells every piece of trivia, uncovers every wart, and discloses every negative comment ever uttered about the Church. They refuse to admit that it is reasonable and acceptable for the Church to be selective in what it chooses to publish, and even in how that information is presented.
There are any number of people—the author included—who insist that the LDS Church is biased, wrong, dishonest, and misleading because it won't publish a history that tells every piece of trivia, uncovers every wart, and discloses every negative comment ever uttered about the Church. They refuse to admit that it is reasonable and acceptable for the Church to be selective in what it chooses to publish, and even in how that information is presented.


In the hardback edition of ONUG, the author introduces Allen Roberts as a "Mormon scholar," which is exactly as Roberts was introduced by the Tanners in the reference cited by the author (they said "Mormon scholar Allen Roberts wrote...") Roberts is a published book author, and his publisher, Signature Books, has the following short vita about Roberts at their Web site:
In the hardback edition of ONUG, the author introduces Allen Roberts as a "Mormon scholar," which is exactly as Roberts was introduced by the Tanners in the reference cited by the author (they said "Mormon scholar Allen Roberts wrote...") Roberts is a published book author, and his publisher, Signature Books.


[[Image:Robertsvita.jpg|center]]
What is not clear, however, is how the author justifies labeling Roberts a "Mormon scholar."  Roberts may have been baptized a member of the Church, but he is non-practicing.  He clearly does not share the opinions, faith, or convictions of most "Mormons."


Notice that there is nothing in the vita that would qualify Roberts as a scholar, unless (perhaps) he was writing about architecture or historical preservation. Note that in the paperback edition of ONUG, the author amends the description by adding "architectural history." It is interesting that the author in the hardback edition initially lends credence to his witness of choice—Allen Roberts—by indicating he is a "Mormon scholar." Although the author has indicated that the editor of the hardback edition committed many errors, the omission of the "architectural history" information would not count as one of them.
The Tanners' and the author's decision to label him as "Mormon" seems calculated simply to give his opinion more weight.


It is ironic, indeed, that in a paragraph devoted to detailing the suppression that the LDS Church supposedly exerts on scholars, in a preface that bemoans the lack of objectivity in LDS histories, and in a book that seeks to bare everything about the LDS Church, the author would choose the term "Mormon scholar" to describe Allen Roberts, rather than saying he is an "award-winning architect specializing in historical restoration." Consider, for a moment, if we recast the author's own wording to reflect the historical truth concerning Roberts:
The author ignores too that ''every'' act of telling or writing history is an "attempt to control depictions of the Mormon past." Individuals want their stories told fully, fairly, and with due balance and perspective.  Institutions and groups&mdash;such as members of the Church&mdash;feel likewise.


<blockquote>
Given the many historical distortions which the author has visited on the Church in an effort to alienate members or potential members from the Gospel it preaches, one can understand the power in historical narratives and the desire of ''all'' involved&mdash;member and non-member, critic or partisan&mdash;to exert control in the telling of the story.
According to the award-winning architect Allen Roberts, LDS leaders do indeed "attempt to control depictions of the Mormon past."<sup>5</sup>
</blockquote>


Of course, it is possible that if the author was not selective in which words he used, and didn't promote Roberts as a Mormon scholar, Roberts' words would not have the intended affect on his readers. This recast isn't nearly as authoritative as the author's original choice of words.
The question to ask is not, "Is the story being controlled?" because it ''always'' is. The question should be, "Is the story being told fairly, fully, and without malice?"
 
Isn't this one of the things that the author himself criticizes the LDS Church of doing? Of being selective in what is presented and always presenting things in the best light possible? Perhaps we should apply the same remedy to ''One Nation Under Gods'' that the author recommends in relation to the LDS Church —- recognize the bias, discount the source, and look for truth elsewhere.
 
In an attempt to defend his choice of adjectives for Allen Roberts on January 27, 2003, the author of ONUG stated the following on the ZLMB message board:
 
<blockquote>
...look at this guy's credits and the periodicals for which he has wrtten [sic]. Look up the word in a simple dictionary. Mine says: "A learned or erudite person. One considered an authority in a specific field." I think Roberts qualifies.
</blockquote>
 
===Does the paperback solve the problem?===
An astute reader will also notice that in the updated paperback edition of ''One Nation Under Gods'' the author modifies the way he previously introduced Roberts. But, this still doesn't solve the problem because the author misses the point completely. There is no question that Allen Roberts is a scholar; as the definition states, he is "an authority in a specific field." Unfortunately, that field is architecture and architectural history, not necessarily LDS history. The author, as an author, has the right to choose the adjectives he uses in his writing. His choice of adjectives, in the hardback edition of his book, indicates a clear 'inflation' of his source's credentials in a field far removed from his formal training. In the more correct reference to Roberts in the paperback edition one can only wonder why the author would rely upon the statement of a "Mormon architectural history scholar" to bolster a claim concerning LDS leaders relative to anything other than their choices in architecture.-->


=Further reading=
=Further reading=
{{AbanesWorks}}
{{AbanesWorks}}

Revision as of 01:27, 17 January 2009


Historical Suppression in the Church
A work by author: Richard Abanes
 An Example of Biased Histories

In edits; editors can click edit to see current text.

Calling All Mormon Scholars

The Quote

One Nation under Gods, page xv (hardback)

According to Mormon scholar Allen Roberts, LDS leaders do indeed "attempt to control depictions of the Mormon past."5

One Nation under Gods, page ix (paperback)

According to Allen Roberts, a Mormon architectural history scholar, LDS leaders do indeed "attempt to control depictions of the Mormon past." (emphasis added)

The Reference

Endnote 5, page 477 (hardback), page 475 (paperback)

5. Allen Roberts, Private Eye Weekly, October 20, 1993, 12. Quoted in Jerald Tanner and Sandra Tanner, "Legacy: A Distorted View of Mormon History,: Salt Lake City Messenger (#88), May 1995, 4

Retrieved from "https://www.fairlatterdaysaints.org/answers/index.php?title=Criticism_of_Mormonism/Books/One_Nation_Under_Gods/Use_of_sources/Calling_All_Mormon_Scholars&oldid=37212"