FAIR is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing well-documented answers to criticisms of the doctrine, practice, and history of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
Array
Criticism of Mormonism/Books/The Lion of the Lord: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
Hirshson's indifference to accuracy is conspicuous….<br><br> | Hirshson's indifference to accuracy is conspicuous….<br><br> | ||
The author's barely concealed antagonism to the Saints bleeds the cause of scholarship….<br><br> | The author's barely concealed antagonism to the Saints bleeds the cause of scholarship….<br><br> | ||
— {{Dialogue|Donald R. Moorman|article=review of ''The Lion of the Lord''|vol=5|num=1|pages=98-100}} (non-LDS reviewer) | — {{Dialogue|Donald R. Moorman|article=review of ''The Lion of the Lord''|vol=5|num=1|pages=98-100}} (non-LDS reviewer)}} | ||
Revision as of 15:56, 28 April 2012
A FAIR Analysis of: The Lion of the Lord A work by author: Stanley P. Hirshson
|
But it is perhaps unfair to ignore the rule that the reviewer should not stray beyond the bounds set by the intentions of the author. Even by these limited standards, however, Hirshson does not come off very well. Claiming to be "one of the few non- Mormons of this century to deal seriously with Young's religion," he has adopted a tone of almost mocking condescension, standing in sharp contrast to those non-Mormon scholars like Thomas F. O'Dea, P.A.M. Taylor, Mario DePillis, and Jan Shipps, whose serious intent--obvious in the work itself--needs no reaffirmation in introductions. If Mr. Hirshson has read his anti-Mormon literature he cannot have missed the almost obligatory professions of serious and scholarly intent gracing the prefaces of even the most blatant diatribes and exposés….
…unfortunately Professor Hirshson has not yet learned that it takes more than clever phrases and a racy topic to write a lively book. As a result, Hirshson's book is not only poor history, but incredibly dull. If, as a reviewer, I had not had the obligation to read it to the bitter end, I don't believe I could have finished it for boredom.
— Klaus Hansen, "review of Lion of the Lord," Dialogue: A Journal of Mormon Thought 5 no. 2, 109.
…unfortunately Professor Hirshson has not yet learned that it takes more than clever phrases and a racy topic to write a lively book. As a result, Hirshson's book is not only poor history, but incredibly dull. If, as a reviewer, I had not had the obligation to read it to the bitter end, I don't believe I could have finished it for boredom.
— Klaus Hansen, "review of Lion of the Lord," Dialogue: A Journal of Mormon Thought 5 no. 2, 109.
The sources exploited by Professor Hirshson and his interpretation of them testify that The Lion of the Lord* has failed to reach the flesh-and-blood Brigham Young, leaving us rather with a caricature of the man drawn from news accounts of the period; the founder of a new western empire is transformed into a paper lion….
The Lion of the Lord provides precious little insight on the subject and leaves the reader to conclude that Professor Hirshson is inclined rather to perpetuate nineteenth-century myths than to search for an understanding
While space limitations preclude a full account of errors in historic fact, several should not go unmentioned….
Hirshson's indifference to accuracy is conspicuous….
The author's barely concealed antagonism to the Saints bleeds the cause of scholarship….
Sub-articles
==