Difference between revisions of "Detailed response to CES Letter, Other"

(mod)
(Names of the Church: mod)
Line 139: Line 139:
 
|summary=Why did the Church change its name twice during its history? Shouldn't the name have been given by revelation?  
 
|summary=Why did the Church change its name twice during its history? Shouldn't the name have been given by revelation?  
 
}}
 
}}
<!--
+
 
 
===="Some things that are true are not very useful"====
 
===="Some things that are true are not very useful"====
{{CESLetterIte'
+
{{CESLetterItem
 
|claim=The author states, "Packer said the following: “There is a temptation for the writer or the teacher of Church history to want to tell everything, whether it is worthy or faith promoting or not.  Some things that are true are not very useful.' Joseph using a rock in a hat instead of the gold plates to translate the Book of Mormon is not a useful truth?  The fact that there are multiple conflicting First Vision accounts is not a useful truth?  The fact that Joseph Smith was involved in Polyandry when D&C 132:61 condemns it as “adultery” is not a useful truth?"
 
|claim=The author states, "Packer said the following: “There is a temptation for the writer or the teacher of Church history to want to tell everything, whether it is worthy or faith promoting or not.  Some things that are true are not very useful.' Joseph using a rock in a hat instead of the gold plates to translate the Book of Mormon is not a useful truth?  The fact that there are multiple conflicting First Vision accounts is not a useful truth?  The fact that Joseph Smith was involved in Polyandry when D&C 132:61 condemns it as “adultery” is not a useful truth?"
 
|answer=
 
|answer=
*Elder Packer was speaking about illustrating weaknesses or mistakes of prominent historical figures. Joseph's use of a "rock in a hat" or multiple First Vision accounts ''has'' been mentioned. Joseph's practice of "polyandry" does not match the definition of adultery in D&C 132. Here is the quote in context:
+
*Elder Packer was speaking about illustrating weaknesses or mistakes of prominent historical figures.  
<blockquote>
+
*Joseph's use of a "rock in a hat" is indeed a "useful" truth, since it makes it more difficult for critics to claim that Joseph was consulting other texts while he dictated the Book of Mormon. Furthermore, the "rock in hat" has been mentioned a number of times in Church materials.
There is a temptation for the writer or the teacher of Church history to want to tell everything, whether it is worthy or faith promoting or not.
+
*Joseph's multiple First Vision accounts have also been mentioned in Church materials, and are even discussed on the Church's official website.
<br><br>
+
*Joseph's practice of "polyandry" does not match the definition of adultery in D&C 132. Verse 63 states, "But if one or either of the ten virgins, after she is espoused, shall be with another man, she has committed adultery." Joseph was never "with another woman" who was married to another man. Joseph was sealed to women who were married to other men, but there is no evidence that he had any physical intimacy with them. In fact, as the author points out, "These married women continued to live as husband and wife with their prior husband after marrying Joseph." More accurately stated, "These married women continued to live as husband and wife with their ''current'' husband after being ''sealed'' to Joseph. At that time, it was possible to be sealed for eternity to someone other than your current spouse.
Some things that are true are not very useful.
 
<br><br>
 
Historians seem to take great pride in publishing something new, particularly if it illustrates a weakness or mistake of a prominent historical figure. For some reason, historians and novelists seem to savor such things. If it related to a living person, it would come under the heading of gossip. History can be as misleading as gossip and much more difficult—often impossible—to verify.
 
<br><br>
 
The writer or the teacher who has an exaggerated loyalty to the theory that everything must be told is laying a foundation for his own judgment. He should not complain if one day he himself receives as he has given. Perhaps that is what is contemplated in having one’s sins preached from the housetops.
 
<br><br>
 
Elder Boyd K. Packer, [https://si.lds.org/bc/seminary/content/library/talks/ces-symposium-addresses/the-mantle-is-far-far-greater-than-the-intellect_eng.pdf "The Mantle is Far, Far Greater than the Intellect], CES symposium on the Doctrine and Covenants and church history, 22 august 1981, Brigham Young University
 
</blockquote>
 
 
|link=
 
|link=
 
|subject=
 
|subject=
 
|summary=
 
|summary=
 
}}
 
}}
-->
+
 
 
====Researching “unapproved” materials on the internet====
 
====Researching “unapproved” materials on the internet====
 
{{CESLetterItem
 
{{CESLetterItem

Revision as of 18:07, 7 July 2013

  1. REDIRECTTemplate:Test3


A FAIR Analysis of:
[[../|Letter to a CES Director]]


A FAIR Analysis of the online document Letter to a CES Director section "Other Concerns & Questions"

Quick Navigation

Response Section

Church Finances

Template:CESLetterItem

Tithing

Template:CESLetterItem

Names of the Church

Template:CESLetterItem

"Some things that are true are not very useful"

Template:CESLetterItem

Researching “unapproved” materials on the internet

Template:CESLetterItem

Template:CESLetterItem