Difference between revisions of "Detailed response to CES Letter, Prophets"

(Mark Hofmann: mod)
(Mark Hofmann: mod)
Line 108: Line 108:
 
I knew there would be a great fuss. Scholars have pored over them, discussed them, written about them, differed in their opinions, and even argued about them.
 
I knew there would be a great fuss. Scholars have pored over them, discussed them, written about them, differed in their opinions, and even argued about them.
 
<br><br>
 
<br><br>
I am glad we have them. ''They are interesting documents of whose authenticity we are not certain and may never be.'' However, assuming that they are authentic, they are valuable writings of the period out of which they have come. But they have no real relevancy to the question of the authenticity of the Church or of the divine origin of the Book of Mormon.
+
I am glad we have them. <span style="color:blue">They are interesting documents of whose authenticity we are not certain and may never be.</span> However, assuming that they are authentic, they are valuable writings of the period out of which they have come. But they have no real relevancy to the question of the authenticity of the Church or of the divine origin of the Book of Mormon.
 
<br><br>
 
<br><br>
 
Much has been said about the Martin Harris/W. W. Phelps letter. I ask: Shall two men, their character, their faith, their lives, the testimonies to which they gave voice to the end of their days, be judged by a few words on a sheet of paper that may or may not have been written by the one and received by the other?
 
Much has been said about the Martin Harris/W. W. Phelps letter. I ask: Shall two men, their character, their faith, their lives, the testimonies to which they gave voice to the end of their days, be judged by a few words on a sheet of paper that may or may not have been written by the one and received by the other?

Revision as of 21:29, 16 July 2013

  1. REDIRECTTemplate:Test3


A FAIR Analysis of:
[[../|Letter to a CES Director]]


A FAIR Analysis of the online document Letter to a CES Director section "Prophets Concerns & Questions"

A few question their faith when they find a statement made by a Church leader decades ago that seems incongruent with our doctrine. There is an important principle that governs the doctrine of the Church. The doctrine is taught by all 15 members of the First Presidency and Quorum of the Twelve. It is not hidden in an obscure paragraph of one talk. True principles are taught frequently and by many. Our doctrine is not difficult to find.

The leaders of the Church are honest but imperfect men. Remember the words of Moroni: “Condemn me not because of mine imperfection, neither my father … ; but rather give thanks unto God that he hath made manifest unto you our imperfections, that ye may learn to be more wise than we have been” (Ether 12꞉6).

— Elder Neil L. Anderson, "Trial of Your Faith," Ensign (November 2012).
∗       ∗       ∗

Quick Navigation

Response Section

Adam-God

Template:CESLetterItem

Blood Atonement

Template:CESLetterItem

Polygamy

Template:CESLetterItem

Blacks Ban

Template:CESLetterItem

Mark Hofmann

Template:CESLetterItem

"Why would I want them following the prophet when a prophet is just a man of his time?"

Template:CESLetterItem

== Notes ==

  1. [note]  Gordon B. Hinckley, "First Presidency Message: Keep the Faith," Ensign (September 1985): 3. off-site