FAIR is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing well-documented answers to criticisms of the doctrine, practice, and history of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
Difference between revisions of "Question: Did Prescindia Buell (or Sarah Pratt, or Mrs. Hyde) not know who was the father of her son?"
m |
m |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
=={{Criticism label}}== | =={{Criticism label}}== | ||
| − | * Critics claim that | + | * Critics claim that Prescindia_Lathrop_Huntington_Buell admitted that she did not know who was the father of her child—Joseph Smith or her first husband. |
* Critics sometimes mistake Sarah Pratt (wife of apostle Orson Pratt) as the woman in this story.{{ref|hales.577}} | * Critics sometimes mistake Sarah Pratt (wife of apostle Orson Pratt) as the woman in this story.{{ref|hales.577}} | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
=={{Conclusion label}}== | =={{Conclusion label}}== | ||
| − | + | {{SeeAlso|Joseph_Smith/Polygamy/Plural_wives#Prescindia_Lathrop_Huntington_Buell|l1=Marinda Hyde's sealing to Joseph Smith|Joseph_Smith/Polygamy/Sent_husbands_on_missions_to_steal_wives|l2=Did Joseph send men on missions to steal their wives?}} | |
| − | |||
| − | {{SeeAlso| | ||
== == | == == | ||
{{Response label}} | {{Response label}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | The source for this claim is an anti-Mormon book. The relevant passage reads: | ||
| + | |||
| + | :The Prophet had sent some time before this, three men, Law, Foster and Jacobs, on missions, and they had just returned, and found their wives blushing under the prospective honors of spiritual wifeism; and another woman, Mrs. Buel [sic], had left her husband, a Gentile, to grace the Prophet's retinue, on horseback, when he reviewed the Nauvoo Legion. I heard the latter woman say afterwards in Utah, that she did not know whether Mr. Buel [sic] or the Prophet was the father of her son. These men [Law, Foster and Jacobs] established a press in Nauvoo, to expose his alleged vicious teachings and practices, which a revelation from Joseph destroyed.{{ref|ettie.34.35}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===Errors of fact=== | ||
| + | There are many claims in this passage that are suspect. | ||
| + | # Ettie Smith claims that William Law, | ||
=={{Endnotes label}}== | =={{Endnotes label}}== | ||
| − | #{{note|hales.577}} This type of error is not new. An 1884 document claiming to be by Sarah Pratt (who was by then antagonistic to the Church) describes her as the wife of "Orson Hyde," rather than "Orson Pratt." This error is corrected three times, but the error stands in three other cases. See discussion in {{Book:Hales:JS Polygamy 1/Full title|pages=577}} The document cited is [Anonymous], "Workings of Mormonism Related By Mrs. Orson Pratt," typescript of holograph, MS 4048, LDS Church History Library. Sarah Pratt's role, if any, in creating the document is not known. (See Hales, 2:462). | + | #{{note|hales.577}} This type of error is not new in later anti-Mormon documents. An 1884 document claiming to be by Sarah Pratt (who was by then antagonistic to the Church) describes her as the wife of "Orson Hyde," rather than "Orson Pratt." This error is corrected three times, but the error stands in three other cases. See discussion in {{Book:Hales:JS Polygamy 1/Full title|pages=577}} The document cited is [Anonymous], "Workings of Mormonism Related By Mrs. Orson Pratt," typescript of holograph, MS 4048, LDS Church History Library. Sarah Pratt's role, if any, in creating the document is not known. (See Hales, 2:462). |
| + | #{{note|ettie.34.35}} {{CriticalWork:Green:Fifteen Years/Full title|pages=34–35}} | ||
{{FurtherReading}} | {{FurtherReading}} | ||
Revision as of 12:16, 29 July 2013
- REDIRECTTemplate:Test3
Contents
Questions
==
- Critics claim that Prescindia_Lathrop_Huntington_Buell admitted that she did not know who was the father of her child—Joseph Smith or her first husband.
- Critics sometimes mistake Sarah Pratt (wife of apostle Orson Pratt) as the woman in this story.[1]
To see citations to the critical sources for these claims, [[../CriticalSources|click here]]
==Answer
==
Detailed Analysis
The source for this claim is an anti-Mormon book. The relevant passage reads:
- The Prophet had sent some time before this, three men, Law, Foster and Jacobs, on missions, and they had just returned, and found their wives blushing under the prospective honors of spiritual wifeism; and another woman, Mrs. Buel [sic], had left her husband, a Gentile, to grace the Prophet's retinue, on horseback, when he reviewed the Nauvoo Legion. I heard the latter woman say afterwards in Utah, that she did not know whether Mr. Buel [sic] or the Prophet was the father of her son. These men [Law, Foster and Jacobs] established a press in Nauvoo, to expose his alleged vicious teachings and practices, which a revelation from Joseph destroyed.[2]
Errors of fact
There are many claims in this passage that are suspect.
- Ettie Smith claims that William Law,
== Notes ==
- [note] This type of error is not new in later anti-Mormon documents. An 1884 document claiming to be by Sarah Pratt (who was by then antagonistic to the Church) describes her as the wife of "Orson Hyde," rather than "Orson Pratt." This error is corrected three times, but the error stands in three other cases. See discussion in Brian C. Hales, Joseph Smith's Polygamy Volume 1: History (Salt Lake City, Utah: Greg Kofford Books, 2013), 577. The document cited is [Anonymous], "Workings of Mormonism Related By Mrs. Orson Pratt," typescript of holograph, MS 4048, LDS Church History Library. Sarah Pratt's role, if any, in creating the document is not known. (See Hales, 2:462).
- [note] Nelson Winch Green, Fifteen Years among the Mormons: Being the Narrative of Mrs. Mary Ettie V. Smith, Late of Great Salt Lake City; a Sister of One of the Mormon High Priests, She Having Been Personally Acquainted with Most of the Mormon Leaders, and Long in the Confidence of The "Prophet," Brigham Young (New York: H. Dayton, Publishers, 1860 [1858]), 34–35.