
FAIR is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing well-documented answers to criticisms of the doctrine, practice, and history of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
|  (rm) |  (mod) | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
| |notes={{AuthorsDisclaimer}} | |notes={{AuthorsDisclaimer}} | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| == == | |||
| {{Author claims label}} | |||
| ===One Nation under Gods, page 213-214 (hardback and paperback)=== | ===One Nation under Gods, page 213-214 (hardback and paperback)=== | ||
| "Hosea Stout had three men flogged because they 'were not in good fellowship.'" | "Hosea Stout had three men flogged because they 'were not in good fellowship.'" | ||
| == | == == | ||
| {{Author sources label}} | |||
| ===Endnote 46, page 552 (hardback); page 550 (paperback)=== | ===Endnote 46, page 552 (hardback); page 550 (paperback)=== | ||
| *Hosea Stout, under September 14, 1845, in Brooks, vol. 1, 63. | *Hosea Stout, under September 14, 1845, in Brooks, vol. 1, 63. | ||
| == | == == | ||
| {{Conclusion label}} | |||
| The author fails to provide the necessary context, and thereby distorts his source. | The author fails to provide the necessary context, and thereby distorts his source. | ||
| Other homicides by members of the Council of Fifty | A FAIR Analysis of:  One Nation Under Gods A work by author: Richard Abanes | Whistling and Whittling Brigades | 
"Hosea Stout had three men flogged because they 'were not in good fellowship.'"
The author fails to provide the necessary context, and thereby distorts his source.
Stout's journal entry begins:
The problems begin at the afternoon meeting:
Thus, the Nauvoo police did not threaten others because they were "not in good fellowship." There was no problem with these men being in town, or attending the morning preaching.
However, the afternoon meeting was "a business meeting." The Saints did not have an indoor assembly hall large enough to accommodate them, so meetings were held out of doors. The men "out of fellowship" who were flogged were refusing to leave a private meeting to which they were not invited and not entitled to attend.
The conclusion of Stout's diary entry probably illustrates why the Saints were so determined that their enemies not be present at their business meeting, during which plans for defense of the city and citizens were probably a topic:
These floggings did not occur in a peaceful, tranquil, 21st century city. This was a nineteenth-century frontier town, surrounded by hostile enemies who were burning out-lying Mormon homes and who would again drive the Saints from Illinois in winter weather. The Saints had to make plans to maintain the peace of their city—plans which could be compromised if apostates or dissidents were aware of them. Those "out of fellowship" might also use what they learned at the business meeting to perform acts for which the Mormons could be "framed," giving their enemies a justification for further attacks and military action.
The author often relies on Quinn, though he here does not cite him:
Like the author, Quinn's treatment is inadequate. He fails to note that Stout did nothing to prevent those out of fellowship from attending public preaching meetings, and says nothing about the security situation in which the Church members found themselves. He tells us nothing about the fact that violence only occurred after the three dissidents refused to leave a meeting to which they were not invited.
The partial use of sources can sometimes lead to an inaccurate view of the complete picture.
== Notes ==

FAIR is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing well-documented answers to criticisms of the doctrine, practice, and history of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
We are a volunteer organization. We invite you to give back.
Donate Now