Difference between revisions of "Detailed response to CES Letter, Prophets"

(Blood Atonement: m)
(Blood Atonement: m)
Line 53: Line 53:
 
'''Answer''': We believe in "blood atonement" by the sacrifice of the Savior, also that which is declared in {{b||Genesis|9|6|}}. A capital sin committed by a man who has entered into the everlasting covenant merits capital punishment, which is the only atonement he can offer. But the penalty must be executed by an officer legally appointed under the law of the land.
 
'''Answer''': We believe in "blood atonement" by the sacrifice of the Savior, also that which is declared in {{b||Genesis|9|6|}}. A capital sin committed by a man who has entered into the everlasting covenant merits capital punishment, which is the only atonement he can offer. But the penalty must be executed by an officer legally appointed under the law of the land.
 
}}
 
}}
*{{Correct}}Certain doctrines that applied to 19th-Century and 20th-Century Latter-day Saints were indeed later repudiated. One of these was "blood atonement."
+
*{{Correct}}Certain doctrines that applied to 19th-Century and 20th-Century Latter-day Saints were indeed later repudiated. Two of these were Adam-God and "blood atonement."
*{{Incorrect}}If a doctrine that was once taught by a past prophet is rejected by a later prophet, we do not consider the earlier prophet to be a "heretic." We simply consider him to be human.
+
*{{Incorrect}}If a doctrine that was once taught by a past prophet is rejected by a later prophet, we do not consider the earlier prophet to be a "heretic": We simply consider him to be human. For example, Brigham Young taught Adam-God and "blood atonement," yet we do not today consider Brigham to be a heretic. We simply disregard those teachings which have been repudiated. Having attended Church in the past, the author must be aware that Brigham is not consider to be a heretic.
 
*{{Fact}}The idea behind "blood atonement" is that there are certain sins that were so bad that the only thing one could do to fully redeem himself was to give his own life, willingly or unwillingly. Some critics of the Church have even asserted that "blood atonement" applied to those who apostatized from the Church, and that they would have been put to death. Brigham Young's own words contradict this idea.
 
*{{Fact}}The idea behind "blood atonement" is that there are certain sins that were so bad that the only thing one could do to fully redeem himself was to give his own life, willingly or unwillingly. Some critics of the Church have even asserted that "blood atonement" applied to those who apostatized from the Church, and that they would have been put to death. Brigham Young's own words contradict this idea.
 
|quote=
 
|quote=

Revision as of 14:08, 18 April 2014

  1. REDIRECTTemplate:Test3

Response to "Prophets Concerns & Questions"


A FAIR Analysis of:
[[../|Letter to a CES Director]]


A few question their faith when they find a statement made by a Church leader decades ago that seems incongruent with our doctrine. There is an important principle that governs the doctrine of the Church. The doctrine is taught by all 15 members of the First Presidency and Quorum of the Twelve. It is not hidden in an obscure paragraph of one talk. True principles are taught frequently and by many. Our doctrine is not difficult to find.

The leaders of the Church are honest but imperfect men. Remember the words of Moroni: “Condemn me not because of mine imperfection, neither my father … ; but rather give thanks unto God that he hath made manifest unto you our imperfections, that ye may learn to be more wise than we have been” (Ether 12꞉6).

— Elder Neil L. Anderson, "Trial of Your Faith," Ensign (November 2012).
∗       ∗       ∗

Quick Navigation

Response Section

Adam-God

Template:CESLetterItem

Blood Atonement

Template:CESLetterItem

Polygamy

Template:CESLetterItem

Blacks Ban

Template:CESLetterItem

Mark Hofmann

Template:CESLetterItem

"Why would I want them following the prophet when a prophet is just a man of his time?"

Template:CESLetterItem