Difference between revisions of "Detailed response to CES Letter, Testimony and Spiritual Witness"

("how can they be sure of the reliability of this same exact process in telling them that Mormonism is true?": m)
("Joseph Smith received a revelation, through the peep stone in his hat, to send Hiram Page and Oliver Cowdery to Toronto, Canada for the sole purpose of selling the copyright of the Book of Mormon": m)
Line 122: Line 122:
 
}}
 
}}
  
===="Joseph Smith received a revelation, through the peep stone in his hat, to send Hiram Page and Oliver Cowdery to Toronto, Canada for the sole purpose of selling the copyright of the Book of Mormon"====
+
=="Joseph Smith received a revelation, through the peep stone in his hat, to send Hiram Page and Oliver Cowdery to Toronto, Canada for the sole purpose of selling the copyright of the Book of Mormon"==
{{CESLetterItem
+
{{CESLetterItemShort
|claim=The author states, "Joseph Smith received a revelation, through the peep stone in his hat, to send Hiram Page and Oliver Cowdery to Toronto, Canada for the sole purpose of selling the copyright of the Book of Mormon. . . . The mission failed and the prophet was asked why his revelation was wrong.Joseph decided to inquire of the Lord regarding the question.  The following is a quote from Book of Mormon witness David Whitmer’s testimony:“…and behold the following revelation came through the stone: ‘Some revelations are of God; and some revelations are of man: and some revelations are of the devil.’  So we see that the revelation to go to Toronto and sell the copy-right was not of God, but was of the devil or of the heart of man.” – David Whitmer, An Address to All Believers in Christ, p.3. How are we supposed to know what revelations are from God, from the devil, or from the heart of man if even the Prophet Joseph Smith couldn’t tell?  What kind of a god and method is this if Heavenly Father allows Satan to interfere with our direct line of communication to Him?
+
|claim=Joseph Smith received a revelation, through the peep stone in his hat, to send Hiram Page and Oliver Cowdery to Toronto, Canada for the sole purpose of selling the copyright of the Book of Mormon. . . . The mission failed and the prophet was asked why his revelation was wrong.Joseph decided to inquire of the Lord regarding the question.  The following is a quote from Book of Mormon witness David Whitmer’s testimony:“…and behold the following revelation came through the stone: ‘Some revelations are of God; and some revelations are of man: and some revelations are of the devil.’  So we see that the revelation to go to Toronto and sell the copy-right was not of God, but was of the devil or of the heart of man.” – David Whitmer, An Address to All Believers in Christ, p.3. How are we supposed to know what revelations are from God, from the devil, or from the heart of man if even the Prophet Joseph Smith couldn’t tell?  What kind of a god and method is this if Heavenly Father allows Satan to interfere with our direct line of communication to Him?
|answer=
 
*Joseph Smith had been told there were people in Canada willing to buy the copyrights to useful books.  Due to the dire financial position of the Church, he decided this could be an opportunity to relieve some of the financial pressure associated with publishing the Book of Mormon.  Four men went to Canada.  Before leaving, Joseph Smith received a [[Book of Mormon/Attempt to sell copyright/Revelation|revelation]] directing them to go to Kingston, Canada, with some conditions placed upon their success.
 
<blockquote>
 
...it Pleaseth me that Oliver Cowderey Joseph Knight Hyram Page<del>e</del> & Josiah Stowel shall do my work in this thing yea even in securing the <ins>Copy</ins>right & they shall do it with an eye single to my Glory that it may be the means of bringing souls unto me Salvation through mine only Be{<del>t</del>\gotten} Behold I am God I have spoken it <del>& it is expedient in me</del> Wherefor I say unto you that ye shall go <del>to Kingston</del> seeking me continually through mine only Be{t\gotten} & if ye do this ye shall have my spirit to go with you & ye shall have an addition of all things which is expedient in me. <ins>amen</ins> & I grant unto my servent a privelige that he may sell <ins>a copyright</ins> through you speaking after the manner of men for the four Provinces if the People harden not their hearts against the enticeings of my spirit & my word for Behold it lieth in themselves to their condemnation <del>&</del>{<del>◊</del>\or} th{<del>er</del>\eir} salvation. (''Revelation Book 1'', p. 15 {{link|url=http://josephsmithpapers.org/paperSummary/revelation-book-1?dm=image-and-text&zm=zoom-inner&tm=expanded&p=15&s=undefined&sm=none}})
 
</blockquote>
 
*The text of the revelation was published in the ''The Joseph Smith Papers: The Revelations and Translations Series.'' According to Marlin K. Jensen, Church Historian and Recorder,
 
<blockquote>
 
Another interesting development from work on the Revelations and Translations Series has been the identification of a previously unpublished revelation on securing a copyright for the Book of Mormon in Canada. David Whitmer, after he left the Church, recalled that the revelation promised success in selling the copyright, but upon return of the men charged with the duty, Joseph Smith and others were disappointed by what seemed like failure. Historians have relied upon statements of David Whitmer, Hiram Page, and William McLellin for decades but have not had the actual text of the revelation. Revelation Book 1 will provide that.
 
<br><br>
 
Although we still do not know the whole story, particularly Joseph Smith’s own view of the situation, we do know that calling the divine communication a “failed revelation” is not warranted. The Lord’s directive clearly conditions the successful sale of the copyright on the worthiness of those seeking to make the sale as well as on the spiritual receptivity of the potential purchasers. {{ref|jensen1}}
 
</blockquote>
 
*Hiram Page, who was one of the individuals sent to Canada, laid out the event in a letter in 1848.{{ref|page.1848}} Page wrote that the revelation Joseph Smith received conditioned success upon whether those individuals in Canada capable of buying the Book of Mormon copyright would have their hearts softened.  When unable to sell the copyright, the four men returned to Palmyra.  Hiram Page stated he for the first time understood how some revelations given to people were not necessarily for their direct benefit&mdash;in fact, Hiram Page believed that the revelation was actually ''fulfilled''.
 
 
}}
 
}}
[[File:Revelation book 1 p. 15 1.jpg|800 px]]
+
{{:Book of Mormon/Attempt to sell copyright}}
  
 
===="I saw a testimony as more than just spiritual experiences and feelings.  I saw that we had evidence and logic on our side based on the correlated narrative I was fed by the Church about its origins."====
 
===="I saw a testimony as more than just spiritual experiences and feelings.  I saw that we had evidence and logic on our side based on the correlated narrative I was fed by the Church about its origins."====

Revision as of 23:28, 11 May 2014

  1. REDIRECTTemplate:Test3

Response to "Testimony & Spiritual Witness Concerns & Questions"


A FAIR Analysis of:
[[../|Letter to a CES Director]]


And they said one to another, Did not our heart burn within us, while he talked with us by the way, and while he opened to us the scriptures? (Luke 24꞉32)
My heart was hot within me, while I was musing the fire burned: then spake I with my tongue. (Psalms 39꞉3)
What does a “burning in the bosom” mean? Does it need to be a feeling of caloric heat, like the burning produced by combustion? If that is the meaning, I have never had a burning in the bosom. Surely, the word “burning” in this scripture signifies a feeling of comfort and serenity. That is the witness many receive. That is the way revelation works.
—Dallin H. Oaks, "Teaching and Learning by the Spirit," Ensign (March 1997): 14.
∗       ∗       ∗

Quick Navigation

Response Section

"Every major religion has members who claim the same thing: God or God’s spirit bore witness to them"

Template:CESLetterItem


"it would likewise be arrogant of a Latter-day Saint to deny their spiritual experiences and testimonies of the truthfulness of their own religion"

Template:CESLetterItem

"If God’s method to revealing truth is through feelings, it’s a pretty ineffective method"

Template:CESLetterItem

"Joseph Smith received a revelation, through the peep stone in his hat, to send Hiram Page and Oliver Cowdery to Toronto, Canada for the sole purpose of selling the copyright of the Book of Mormon"

Template:CESLetterItemShort

Attempt to sell the Book of Mormon copyright in Canada


Jump to details:



"I saw a testimony as more than just spiritual experiences and feelings. I saw that we had evidence and logic on our side based on the correlated narrative I was fed by the Church about its origins."

Template:CESLetterItem

Paul H. Dunn

Template:CESLetterItem

"a testimony is to be found in the bearing of it"

Template:CESLetterItem

"how can they be sure of the reliability of this same exact process in telling them that Mormonism is true?"

Template:CESLetterItem

"I felt the Spirit watching 'Saving Private Ryan' and the 'Schindler’s List'. Both R-rated and horribly violent movies. I also felt the Spirit watching 'Forrest Gump' and the 'Lion King'."

Template:CESLetterItem

"Why did I feel the Spirit as I listened to the stories of apostates sharing how they discovered for themselves that Mormonism is not true?"

Template:CESLetterItem