FAIR is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing well-documented answers to criticisms of the doctrine, practice, and history of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
Difference between revisions of "Criticism of Mormonism/Books/Blood of the Prophets: Brigham Young and the Massacre at Mountain Meadows/Use of sources/Bishop Philip Klingensmith"
< Criticism of Mormonism | Books | Blood of the Prophets: Brigham Young and the Massacre at Mountain Meadows | Use of sources
(rm) |
(m) |
||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
One reviewer discussed the problems with this witness: | One reviewer discussed the problems with this witness: | ||
| − | :How good is Klingensmith's testimony?...upon cross-examination during the first Lee trial, Klingensmith admitted that whatever passed between Lee and Young about the massacre was outside his hearing. His testimony was so worthless that U.S. District Attorney Sumner Howard declined to recall Klingensmith for the second trial. Klingensmith also admitted to participating in the massacre. He turned state's evidence before Lee's first trial in exchange for a grant of immunity. He gave his testimony as a disillusioned apostate. Thus his 6 October 1857 account is very suspect, even without Young's denial."{{ | + | :How good is Klingensmith's testimony?...upon cross-examination during the first Lee trial, Klingensmith admitted that whatever passed between Lee and Young about the massacre was outside his hearing. His testimony was so worthless that U.S. District Attorney Sumner Howard declined to recall Klingensmith for the second trial. Klingensmith also admitted to participating in the massacre. He turned state's evidence before Lee's first trial in exchange for a grant of immunity. He gave his testimony as a disillusioned apostate. Thus his 6 October 1857 account is very suspect, even without Young's denial." <ref>{{FR-15-2-11}}</ref> |
| − | =={{Endnotes label}} | + | == == |
| − | + | {{Endnotes label}} | |
| + | |||
| + | <references/> | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{Articles Footer 1}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Category:Mountain Meadows Massacre]] | ||
Revision as of 20:00, 9 June 2014
- REDIRECTTemplate:Test3
| A work by author: Will Bagley
|
The problem
- Critics often use the testimony of (former) Bishop Philip Klingensmith on the Massacre.
To see citations to the critical sources for these claims, click here
Detailed Analysis
One reviewer discussed the problems with this witness:
- How good is Klingensmith's testimony?...upon cross-examination during the first Lee trial, Klingensmith admitted that whatever passed between Lee and Young about the massacre was outside his hearing. His testimony was so worthless that U.S. District Attorney Sumner Howard declined to recall Klingensmith for the second trial. Klingensmith also admitted to participating in the massacre. He turned state's evidence before Lee's first trial in exchange for a grant of immunity. He gave his testimony as a disillusioned apostate. Thus his 6 October 1857 account is very suspect, even without Young's denial." [1]
Notes