Difference between revisions of "Jeffrey R. Holland: "All I’m saying is that what got translated got translated into the word of God""

(m)
(m)
Line 38: Line 38:
 
|link=Book of Abraham/Joseph Smith Papyri/Church disclosure of "Book of the Dead"
 
|link=Book of Abraham/Joseph Smith Papyri/Church disclosure of "Book of the Dead"
 
|subject=When did the Church disclose that the Joseph Smith Papyri were an Egyptian funerary text?
 
|subject=When did the Church disclose that the Joseph Smith Papyri were an Egyptian funerary text?
|summary=Critics of the Church often assert that the Church did not identify the Joseph Smith Papyri as an Egyptian funerary text until after Egyptologists examined them. They also claim that the Church is hiding or "covering up" the papyri's actual contents. Both assertions are incorrect. In fact, the Church ran a multi-part series with color pictures of the papyri in the ''Improvement Era'' (the predecessor to the ''Ensign'') less than two months after they were received from the Metropolitan Museum.<ref>''Improvement Era'' { January 1968).</ref> The series repeatedly affirmed that the recovered papyri contained Egyptian funerary materials and not the text of Book of Abraham. Although the article erroneously identified the papyrus as the Egyptian "Book of the Dead," it was later correctly identified as a "Book of Breathings."  
+
|summary=Critics of the Church often assert that the Church did not identify the Joseph Smith Papyri as an Egyptian funerary text until after Egyptologists examined them. They also claim that the Church is hiding or "covering up" the papyri's actual contents. Both assertions are incorrect. In fact, the Church ran a multi-part series with color pictures of the papyri in the ''Improvement Era'' (the predecessor to the ''Ensign'') less than two months after they were received from the Metropolitan Museum.<ref>''Improvement Era'' {January 1968).</ref> The series repeatedly affirmed that the recovered papyri contained Egyptian funerary materials and not the text of Book of Abraham. Although the article erroneously identified the papyrus as the Egyptian "Book of the Dead," it was later correctly identified as a "Book of Breathings."  
 
}}
 
}}
  

Revision as of 22:56, 21 July 2014

  1. REDIRECTTemplate:Test3

Elder Holland's interview with BBC reporter John Sweeney in March 2012: Book of Abraham

Questions


During a BBC interview with John Sweeney in March 2012, Elder Jeffrey R. Holland was asked about the Book of Abraham:

Sweeney: Mr. Smith got this papyri and he translated them and subsequently as the Egyptologists cracked the code something completely different...

Holland: All I'm saying...all I'm saying is that what got translated got translated into the word of God. The vehicle for that I do not understand and don't claim to know and know Egyptian.

  • Critics of the Church accuse Elder Holland of lying on this point.

The Pearl of Great Price Student Manual, "The Book of Abraham"

The Pearl of Great Price Student Manual, (2000)
How Did the Prophet Translate the Ancient Writings?


The Prophet Joseph Smith never communicated his method of translating these records. As with all other scriptures, a testimony of the truthfulness of these writings is primarily a matter of faith. The greatest evidence of the truthfulness of the book of Abraham is not found in an analysis of physical evidence nor historical background, but in prayerful consideration of its content and power.

Click here to view the complete article

Answer


The Church has known and publicly acknowledged in the Improvement Era that the papyri fragments do not match the text of the Book of Abraham since 1968 (for over 45 years). This isn't something new. Elder Holland knows this.

Furthermore, Elder Holland's statement is consistent with what the Church itself says on this subject in the The Pearl of Great Price Student Manual. Elder Holland said "what got translated got translated into the word of God." The manual says, "The greatest evidence of the truthfulness of the book of Abraham is not found in an analysis of physical evidence nor historical background, but in prayerful consideration of its content and power."

For further information related to this topic


When did the Church disclose that the Joseph Smith Papyri were an Egyptian funerary text?

Summary: Critics of the Church often assert that the Church did not identify the Joseph Smith Papyri as an Egyptian funerary text until after Egyptologists examined them. They also claim that the Church is hiding or "covering up" the papyri's actual contents. Both assertions are incorrect. In fact, the Church ran a multi-part series with color pictures of the papyri in the Improvement Era (the predecessor to the Ensign) less than two months after they were received from the Metropolitan Museum.[1] The series repeatedly affirmed that the recovered papyri contained Egyptian funerary materials and not the text of Book of Abraham. Although the article erroneously identified the papyrus as the Egyptian "Book of the Dead," it was later correctly identified as a "Book of Breathings."

Notes


  1. Improvement Era {January 1968).