Array

Latter-day Saints and divorce in the nineteenth century: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 30: Line 30:
|subject=Illegal marriages in Ohio?
|subject=Illegal marriages in Ohio?
|summary=Critics charge that Joseph Smith performed monogamous marriages for time of already-married members, violating Ohio law in Kirtland. Such claims are false and represent a misunderstanding about the marriage and divorce law of the day.
|summary=Critics charge that Joseph Smith performed monogamous marriages for time of already-married members, violating Ohio law in Kirtland. Such claims are false and represent a misunderstanding about the marriage and divorce law of the day.
|sublink1=Question: Did Joseph Smith violate marriage laws in Ohio by performing marriages?
|sublink2=Question: When Joseph Smith performed the marriage of Newel Knight and Lydia Bailey, were they guilty of bigamy since Lydia had not been formally divorced from her previous husband?
}}
}}
</onlyinclude>
</onlyinclude>

Revision as of 01:36, 18 April 2017

Latter-day Saint divorce in the 19th century


Mormonism and divorce in the nineteenth century


Divorce in the 19th century

Summary: Some members of the Church remarried without obtaining a formal legal divorce. Critics of the Church try to make this seem dishonest and adulterous, when it was in fact the norm for the period, especially on the frontier and among the poor. Critics are not honest about the legal realities faced by nineteenth century Americans.

Remarrying without civil divorce

Summary: Some critics like to emphasize that some LDS members did not receive civil divorces before remarrying—either monogamously or polygamously. They either state or imply that this shows the Saints' cavalier attitude toward the law.

Illegal marriages in Ohio?

Summary: Critics charge that Joseph Smith performed monogamous marriages for time of already-married members, violating Ohio law in Kirtland. Such claims are false and represent a misunderstanding about the marriage and divorce law of the day.