FAIR is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing well-documented answers to criticisms of the doctrine, practice, and history of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
Difference between revisions of "Question: What criticisms are raised with regard to Book of Mormon archaeology compared to that of the Bible?"
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-{{FME-Source\n\|title=(.*)\n\|category=(.*)\n}} +{{FairMormon}})) |
m (→The claim that there is no archaeological evidence supporting the Book of Mormon is incorrect: bot - tag "Questions") |
||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
[[es:Pregunta: ¿Qué críticas se plantean con respecto a la arqueología del Libro de Mormón en comparación con la de la Biblia?]] | [[es:Pregunta: ¿Qué críticas se plantean con respecto a la arqueología del Libro de Mormón en comparación con la de la Biblia?]] | ||
[[pt:Pergunta: O que as críticas são levantadas em relação ao Livro de Mórmon arqueologia comparada com a da Bíblia?]] | [[pt:Pergunta: O que as críticas são levantadas em relação ao Livro de Mórmon arqueologia comparada com a da Bíblia?]] | ||
| + | [[Category:Questions]] | ||
Revision as of 21:44, 12 April 2024
- REDIRECTTemplate:Test3
Question: What criticisms are raised with regard to Book of Mormon archaeology compared to that of the Bible?
Sectarian critics who accept the Bible claim that the Bible has been "proven" by archaeology
Sectarian critics who accept the Bible, but not the Book of Mormon, sometimes claim that the Bible has been "proven" or "confirmed" by archaeology, and insist that the same cannot be said for the Book of Mormon.
The claim that there is no archaeological evidence supporting the Book of Mormon is incorrect
The claim that, unlike the Bible, there is no archaeological evidence supporting the Book of Mormon is based on naive and erroneous assumptions. Without epigraphic New World evidence (which is currently extremely limited from Book of Mormon times), we are unable to know the contemporary names of ancient Mesoamerican cities and kingdoms. To dismiss the Book of Mormon on archaeological grounds is short-sighted. Newer archaeological finds are generally consistent with the Book of Mormon record even if we are unable (as yet) to know the exact location of Book of Mormon cities.
- What would a "Nephite pot" look like? What would "Nephite" or "Lamanite" weapons look like?
- Think about the Old World--how do you tell the difference between Canaanite pots and houses and garbage dumps, and Israelite pots and houses and garbage dumps? You can't. If we didn't have the Bible and other written texts, we'd have no idea from archaelogy that Israelites were monotheists or that their religion differed from the Canaanites who lived along side them.
- We also know very little about the names of cities in the New World from before the Spanish Conquest. So, even if we found a Nephite city, how would we know? We don't know what the pre-Columbian name for a city was (or how to pronounce them)--so, even if we had found, say, "Zarahemla," how would we know?
Note: Many of the topics sometimes addressed in archaeological critiques of the Book of Mormon are treated in detail on the Book of Mormon "anachronism" page.
Notes