Difference between revisions of "The Bible/"Adding to" or "taking away from""

Revision as of 00:17, 16 November 2005

Criticism

Critics claim that the Book of Mormon cannot be true because the nothing should be "added to" or "taken away from" the Holy Bible.

Source(s) of the criticism

• "[Joseph] Smith apparently was either oblivious to the expressed warning about adding to or substracting from the Word of God, or willfully disobedient to it (see Rev. 22:18,19)." - "Dr." Walter Martin, Mormonism (Minneapolis, Minnesota: Bethany House Publishers, 1984), 29.

Response

The verse often cited (as by Martin, above) is Revelation 22:18-19:

18 For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book: 19 And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book.

Critics claim that this verse states that the Bible is complete, and no other scripture exists or will be forthcoming.

However, the critics ignore that:

• The book of Revelation was written prior to some of the other biblical books, and prior the the Bible being assembled into a collection of texts. Therefore, this verse can only apply to the Book of Revelation, and not the Bible as a whole (some of which was unwritten and none of which was assembled together into 'the Bible')
• The book of Revelation is the last book in the Bible only because it was placed there centuries later. Therefore, John cannot have intended the last few sentences of Revelatioin to apply to the entire Bible, since he was not writing a 'final chapter'.
• Other scriptures (such as Deuteronomy 4:2 and Proverbs 30:6) likewise forbid additions; were the critics arguments to be self-consistent, they would have to then discard everything in the New Testament and much of the Old, since these verses predate "other scripture" added by God through later prophets.
• The Bible forbids men to add to the Word of God; it does not forbid that God may, through a prophet, add to the Word of God. If this were not possible, then the Bible could never have come into existence.

Conclusion

The critics misuse Revelation, misunderstand the process by which the Bible cannon was formed, and must ignore other, earlier scriptures to maintain their position. Their use of this argument is a form of begging the question whereby they presume at the outset that the Book of Mormon and other scriptures are not the Word of God, which is precisely the point under debate. If they are the work of uninspired men, then of course one ought not to trust them. If, however, they are indeed the word of the Lord to prophets, then all ought to heed them.

Further reading

FAIR wiki articles

• Biblical completeness
• Open canon vs. closed canon
• Bible translations

FAIR web site

• FAIR Topical Guide:Bible Complete - no additional scripture
• Scott Gordon, "To Add To or To Take From," (Mesa, Arizona: FAIR, April 2002)*

External links

• Howard W. Hunter, "No Man Shall Add to or Take Away," Ensign (May 1981): 64. *
• Stephen E. Robinson, Are Mormons Christians? (Salt Lake City, Utah: Deseret Book Company, 1993). off-site FAIR linkChapter 6

Printed material

• Alan Denison & D.L. Barksdale, Gues Who Wants To Have You For Lunch?, 2nd edition, (Redding, California: FAIR, 2002[1999]), 37–57. ISBN 1893036057. FAIR