Array

Criticism of Mormonism/Books/The Changing World of Mormonism/Chapter 6: Difference between revisions

m (Created page with '__NOTOC__ {{FAIRAnalysisHeader |title=../../ |author=Jerald and Sandra Tanner |noauthor= |section=Index of claims: Chapter 6 |previous=[[../Chapter 5|Chapter…')
 
mNo edit summary
Line 35: Line 35:
There were no references to the First Vision in the 1830s.
There were no references to the First Vision in the 1830s.
||
||
*[[First Vision/No reference to First Vision in 1830s publications|No reference to First Vision in 1830s publications?]]
*{{FalseStatement}}: [[First Vision/No reference to First Vision in 1830s publications|No reference to First Vision in 1830s publications?]]
||
* {{attn}}
|-
|-
|
|
Line 43: Line 45:
||
||
*[[First Vision/Accounts/1832/Different age provided|Different age provided in the 1832 text]]
*[[First Vision/Accounts/1832/Different age provided|Different age provided in the 1832 text]]
||
* {{attn}}
|-
|-
|
|
Line 50: Line 54:
||
||
*[[First Vision/Accounts/1832/Only one Personage appears|Only one Personage appears in the 1832 account]]
*[[First Vision/Accounts/1832/Only one Personage appears|Only one Personage appears in the 1832 account]]
||
* {{attn}}
|-
|-
|
|
Line 56: Line 62:
The personages in the 1835 version are not explicitly identified as God the Father and Jesus Christ.
The personages in the 1835 version are not explicitly identified as God the Father and Jesus Christ.
||
||
*[[First Vision/Accounts/1835/Mentions "Angels"|The "Angels" of the 1835 account]]
*{{HistoricalDistortion}}: [[First Vision/Accounts/1835/Mentions "Angels"|The "Angels" of the 1835 account]]
||
||
* {{attn}}
|-
|-
|
|
Line 65: Line 72:
The 1835 account talks about a visitation of angels instead of the Father and Son.
The 1835 account talks about a visitation of angels instead of the Father and Son.
||
||
*[[First Vision/Accounts/1835/Mentions "Angels"|The "Angels" of the 1835 account]]
*{{FalseStatement}}[[First Vision/Accounts/1835/Mentions "Angels"|The "Angels" of the 1835 account]]
||
||
*''Deseret News'', vol. 2, no.15, May 29, 1852
*''Deseret News'', vol. 2, no.15, May 29, 1852
Line 74: Line 81:
====159====
====159====
||
||
Joseph's claim of seeing the Father and the Son was not unique.
Joseph's claim of seeing the Father and the Son was not unique.
||
* So what?  Jesus' teaching of repentance was not unique either.
* One must assess the fruits of Joseph's prophetic ministry.  How many of those who claimed visions also produced a 500+ page book in less than three months?
||
* {{attn}}
|-
|-
|
|
Line 81: Line 93:
Oliver Cowdery's 1834 history in the Messenger and Advocate did not mention the First Vision.
Oliver Cowdery's 1834 history in the Messenger and Advocate did not mention the First Vision.
||
||
*[[First Vision/Accounts/Oliver Cowdery not aware of First Vision in 1834-35|Oliver Cowdery not aware of First Vision in 1834-35]]
*{{HistoricalError}}: [[First Vision/Accounts/Oliver Cowdery not aware of First Vision in 1834-35|Oliver Cowdery not aware of First Vision in 1834-35]]
||
||
*''Latter Day Saint's Messenger and Advocate'' 1:42, Feb.1835.
*''Latter Day Saint's Messenger and Advocate'' 1:42, Feb.1835.
Line 92: Line 104:
*[[First Vision/Accounts]]
*[[First Vision/Accounts]]
||
||
*This is an absurd claim on the part of the authors.
*{{Absurd}}: This is an absurd claim on the part of the authors, with (as is usual with such things) no evidence presented.
||
* {{attn}}
|-
|-
|
|
Line 100: Line 114:
The Book of Mormon teaches that there is only one God.
The Book of Mormon teaches that there is only one God.
||  
||  
* Members of the Church believe that God is one.  They also believe that more than one personage can be spoken of as God.
* [[Polytheism|Monotheism vs. Polytheism?]]
||
||
*{{s||Mosiah|15|1-2}}
*{{s||Mosiah|15|1-2}}
Line 110: Line 126:
Brigham Young denied that the Lord came to Joseph Smith in the First Vision.
Brigham Young denied that the Lord came to Joseph Smith in the First Vision.
||
||
*[[First Vision/Accounts/Brigham Young said the Lord didn't appear|Brigham Young said the Lord didn't appear]]
*{{FalseStatement}}[[First Vision/Accounts/Brigham Young said the Lord didn't appear|Brigham Young said the Lord didn't appear]]
||
||
*{{JDwiki|author=Brigham  
*{{JDwiki|author=Brigham Young|url=http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Journal_of_Discourses/Volume_2/The_Constitution_and_Government_of_the_United_States,_etc.|vol=2|pages=171}}
 
Young|url=http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Journal_of_Discourses/Volume_2/The_Constitution_and_Government_of_the_United_States,_etc.|vol=2|pages=1
 
71}}
|-
|-
|
|
Line 123: Line 135:
John Taylor claimed that an angel appeared during the First Vision.
John Taylor claimed that an angel appeared during the First Vision.
||
||
*[[First Vision/Accounts/John Taylor's understanding of the First Vision|John Taylor's understanding of the First Vision]]
*{{FalseStatement}}: [[First Vision/Accounts/John Taylor's understanding of the First Vision|John Taylor's understanding of the First Vision]]
||
||
*{{JDwiki|author=John Taylor|url=http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Journal_of_Discourses/Volume_20/The_Natural_Weakness_of_Men,_etc.  
*{{JDwiki|author=John Taylor|url=http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Journal_of_Discourses/Volume_20/The_Natural_Weakness_of_Men,_etc.|vol=20|pages=167}}
 
|vol=20|pages=167}}
|-
|-
|
|
Line 134: Line 144:
George A. Smith claimed that an angel appeared during the First Vision.
George A. Smith claimed that an angel appeared during the First Vision.
||
||
*[[George A. Smith said First Vision was an "angel"]]
*{{FalseStatement}}: [[George A. Smith said First Vision was an "angel"]]
||
||
*{{JDwiki|author=George A. Smith|url=http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Journal_of_Discourses/Volume_12/The_Sacrament,_etc.|vol=12|pages=333-34}}
*{{JDwiki|author=George A. Smith|url=http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Journal_of_Discourses/Volume_12/The_Sacrament,_etc.|vol=12|pages=333-34}}

Revision as of 22:47, 23 June 2009


A FAIR Analysis of:
Criticism of Mormonism/Books
A work by author: Jerald and Sandra Tanner

Claims made in Chapter 6: The First Vision

Page Claim Response Author's sources

149

Oliver Cowdery's 1834 attempt at writing a history of the Church ignored the First Vision.

149

In 1832 Joseph had a revelation that said that a man could not see God without the priesthood.

  • D&C 84:21-22

150

There were no references to the First Vision in the 1830s.

  •  [ATTENTION!]

152

Joseph's 1832 account mentions that he was in the 16th year of his age rather than the 15th.

  •  [ATTENTION!]

154

The 1832 account only mentions one personage.

  •  [ATTENTION!]

156

The personages in the 1835 version are not explicitly identified as God the Father and Jesus Christ.

  •  [ATTENTION!]

157

The 1835 account talks about a visitation of angels instead of the Father and Son.

  • Deseret News, vol. 2, no.15, May 29, 1852
  • History of the Church 11:312

159

Joseph's claim of seeing the Father and the Son was not unique.

  • So what? Jesus' teaching of repentance was not unique either.
  • One must assess the fruits of Joseph's prophetic ministry. How many of those who claimed visions also produced a 500+ page book in less than three months?
  •  [ATTENTION!]

160

Oliver Cowdery's 1834 history in the Messenger and Advocate did not mention the First Vision.

  • Latter Day Saint's Messenger and Advocate 1:42, Feb.1835.

162

"Mormon apologists are beginning to retreat from the idea that God the Father appeared to Joseph Smith"

  •  Absurd claim: This is an absurd claim on the part of the authors, with (as is usual with such things) no evidence presented.
  •  [ATTENTION!]

162-163

The Book of Mormon teaches that there is only one God.

  • Members of the Church believe that God is one. They also believe that more than one personage can be spoken of as God.
  • Monotheism vs. Polytheism?

164

Brigham Young denied that the Lord came to Joseph Smith in the First Vision.

164

John Taylor claimed that an angel appeared during the First Vision.

164

George A. Smith claimed that an angel appeared during the First Vision.

166-171

There was no revival in the area where Joseph Smith lived in 1820.