FAIR is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing well-documented answers to criticisms of the doctrine, practice, and history of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
Difference between revisions of "Question: Did Wilford Woodruff criticize assistant Church Historian Andrew Jenson's decision to publish the names of those who were married to Joseph Smith because he wanted to hide the fact that Joseph was married to other women?"
GregSmithBot (talk | contribs) m (Robot: Automated text replacement (-Source(s) of the criticism +{{Criticism source label English}}, -Source(s) of the Criticism +{{Criticism source label English}}, -==Criticism== +=={{Criticism label}}==, -==Response== +=={{Response label}}==, -==Qu) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{PolygamyPortal}} | {{PolygamyPortal}} | ||
| − | ==Criticism== | + | =={{Criticism label}}== |
Some critics charge that the Church's desire to hide its historical plural marriage is exemplified by Wilford Woodruff's criticism of assistant Church Historian Andrew Jenson's decision to publish the names of those who were married to Joseph Smith. | Some critics charge that the Church's desire to hide its historical plural marriage is exemplified by Wilford Woodruff's criticism of assistant Church Historian Andrew Jenson's decision to publish the names of those who were married to Joseph Smith. | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
{{CriticalSources}} | {{CriticalSources}} | ||
| − | ==Response== | + | =={{Response label}}== |
George D. Smith writes that Jenson's article “appeared on the down-side slope of the historical peak in polygamy . . . [and] Woodruff complained to Jenson.” G. D. Smith quotes Woodruff to the effect that “we do not think it a wise step to give these names to the world at the present time in the manner in which you have done. . . . Advantage may be taken of their publication and in some instances, to the injury, perhaps, of families or relatives of those whose names are mentioned” (p. 447).{{ref|fn1}} | George D. Smith writes that Jenson's article “appeared on the down-side slope of the historical peak in polygamy . . . [and] Woodruff complained to Jenson.” G. D. Smith quotes Woodruff to the effect that “we do not think it a wise step to give these names to the world at the present time in the manner in which you have done. . . . Advantage may be taken of their publication and in some instances, to the injury, perhaps, of families or relatives of those whose names are mentioned” (p. 447).{{ref|fn1}} | ||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
Rather, Woodruff likely feared the very real risk of spies and government agents using the information to prosecute members of the church. At this period, women were jailed for refusing to testify against husbands; hundreds of men were in hiding or in prison. “Words are inadequate to convey the feelings of those times—the hurts to individuals and families, to the church. . . . Families were torn apart, left to provide as best they could.”{{ref|fn2}} | Rather, Woodruff likely feared the very real risk of spies and government agents using the information to prosecute members of the church. At this period, women were jailed for refusing to testify against husbands; hundreds of men were in hiding or in prison. “Words are inadequate to convey the feelings of those times—the hurts to individuals and families, to the church. . . . Families were torn apart, left to provide as best they could.”{{ref|fn2}} | ||
| − | ==Conclusion== | + | =={{Conclusion label}}== |
Jenson’s material, coming when it did, could have put members in danger. But G.D. Smith makes it appear that Woodruff was trying to hide the practice of plural marriage in 1887. | Jenson’s material, coming when it did, could have put members in danger. But G.D. Smith makes it appear that Woodruff was trying to hide the practice of plural marriage in 1887. | ||
| − | ==Endnotes== | + | =={{Endnotes label}}== |
#{{note|fn1}}G. D. Smith cites Richard S. Van Wagoner, ''Mormon Polygamy: A History'', 2nd ed. (Salt Lake City: Signature Books, 1989), 135, which includes a letter from Wilford Woodruff to Andrew Jenson, 6 August 1887. | #{{note|fn1}}G. D. Smith cites Richard S. Van Wagoner, ''Mormon Polygamy: A History'', 2nd ed. (Salt Lake City: Signature Books, 1989), 135, which includes a letter from Wilford Woodruff to Andrew Jenson, 6 August 1887. | ||
#{{note|fn2}}S. George Ellsworth, “Utah’s Struggle For Statehood,” ''Utah Historical Quarterly'' 31/1 (Winter 1963): 66. | #{{note|fn2}}S. George Ellsworth, “Utah’s Struggle For Statehood,” ''Utah Historical Quarterly'' 31/1 (Winter 1963): 66. | ||
| − | ==Further reading== | + | =={{Further reading label}}== |
| − | ===FAIR wiki articles=== | + | ==={{FAIR wiki articles label}}=== |
{{PolygamyWiki}} | {{PolygamyWiki}} | ||
| − | ===FAIR web site=== | + | ==={{FAIR web site label}}=== |
{{PolygamyFAIR}} | {{PolygamyFAIR}} | ||
| − | ===External links=== | + | ==={{External links label}}=== |
{{PolygamyLinks}} | {{PolygamyLinks}} | ||
| − | ===Printed material=== | + | ==={{Printed material label}}=== |
{{PolygamyPrint}} | {{PolygamyPrint}} | ||
[[fr:Church history/Censorship and revision/Wilford Woodruff criticizes publication of polygamists]] | [[fr:Church history/Censorship and revision/Wilford Woodruff criticizes publication of polygamists]] | ||
Revision as of 02:29, 4 May 2010
This article is a draft. FairMormon editors are currently editing it. We welcome your suggestions on improving the content.
Contents
Important introductory material on plural marriage available here
| Answers portal |
| Plural marriage |
|
 RESOURCES
|
|---|
|
Joseph Smith era:
Post-Joseph Smith:
Post-Manifesto–present |
 PERSPECTIVES
|
 MEDIA
|
| OTHER PORTALS
|
Questions
== Some critics charge that the Church's desire to hide its historical plural marriage is exemplified by Wilford Woodruff's criticism of assistant Church Historian Andrew Jenson's decision to publish the names of those who were married to Joseph Smith.
Note: This wiki section was based partly on a review of G.D. Smith's Nauvoo Polygamy. As such, it focuses on that author's presentation of the data. To read the full review, follow the link. Gregory L. Smith, A review of Nauvoo Polygamy:...but we called it celestial marriage by George D. Smith. FARMS Review, Vol. 20, Issue 2. (Detailed book review) To see citations to the critical sources for these claims, [[../CriticalSources|click here]]
==Detailed Analysis
==
George D. Smith writes that Jenson's article “appeared on the down-side slope of the historical peak in polygamy . . . [and] Woodruff complained to Jenson.” G. D. Smith quotes Woodruff to the effect that “we do not think it a wise step to give these names to the world at the present time in the manner in which you have done. . . . Advantage may be taken of their publication and in some instances, to the injury, perhaps, of families or relatives of those whose names are mentioned” (p. 447).[1]
What is not explained or acknowledged is that Woodruff’s paramount concern was not to hide history or deny plural marriage (the Manifesto was three years in the future: polygamy was hardly a secret).
Risks to members
Rather, Woodruff likely feared the very real risk of spies and government agents using the information to prosecute members of the church. At this period, women were jailed for refusing to testify against husbands; hundreds of men were in hiding or in prison. “Words are inadequate to convey the feelings of those times—the hurts to individuals and families, to the church. . . . Families were torn apart, left to provide as best they could.”[2]
==Answer
==
Jenson’s material, coming when it did, could have put members in danger. But G.D. Smith makes it appear that Woodruff was trying to hide the practice of plural marriage in 1887.
== Notes ==
- [note] G. D. Smith cites Richard S. Van Wagoner, Mormon Polygamy: A History, 2nd ed. (Salt Lake City: Signature Books, 1989), 135, which includes a letter from Wilford Woodruff to Andrew Jenson, 6 August 1887.
- [note] S. George Ellsworth, “Utah’s Struggle For Statehood,” Utah Historical Quarterly 31/1 (Winter 1963): 66.