Book of Mormon/B.H. Roberts and "Studies of the Book of Mormon": Difference between revisions

Revision as of 23:02, 23 May 2010

< Back to FAIR Answers Index

This article is a draft. FairMormon editors are currently editing it. We welcome your suggestions on improving the content.

==

==

Critics use B.H. Roberts' critical evaluation of Book of Mormon difficulties to support their arguments.

To see citations to the critical sources for these claims, click here

==

==

Main article: B.H. Roberts' testimony of the Book of Mormon

GospeLink Books, Complete List
Daniel C. Peterson, “Yet More Abuse of B.H. Roberts,” FARMS Review of Books 9/1 (1997): 69-86. off-site
Matthew Roper, “Unanswered Mormon Scholars,” FARMS Review of Books 9/1 (1997) (Note: only pages 98-110 are relevant to the issue of Roberts, but have some salient points not mentioned elsewhere.) off-site
"No Sir That’s Not History," off-site
"View of the Hebrews: An Un-Parallel," off-site
John Welch, “B.H. Roberts Affirms Book of Mormon Antiquity in Newly Released Manuscript” Insights: An Ancient Window 13/6 (November 1993). off-site

@@ Line 28: / Line 28: @@
 ==={{Printed material label}}===
 *Printed resources whose text is not available online
+{{Articles Footer 1}} {{Articles Footer 2}} {{Articles Footer 3}} {{Articles Footer 4}} {{Articles Footer 5}} {{Articles Footer 6}} {{Articles Footer 7}} {{Articles Footer 8}} {{Articles Footer 9}} {{Articles Footer 10}}
 [[fr:Book of Mormon/B.H. Roberts and "Studies of the Book of Mormon"]]