FAIR is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing well-documented answers to criticisms of the doctrine, practice, and history of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
Difference between revisions of "Multiple accounts of the First Vision"
m (→Further reading) |
m |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
Critics of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints often seek to point out differences between the various accounts which Joseph Smith gave of his First Vision. In defense of their position that the Prophet changed his story over a six year period (1832 to 1838) they claim that the earliest followers of Joseph Smith either didn’t know about the First Vision, or seem to have been confused about it. | Critics of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints often seek to point out differences between the various accounts which Joseph Smith gave of his First Vision. In defense of their position that the Prophet changed his story over a six year period (1832 to 1838) they claim that the earliest followers of Joseph Smith either didn’t know about the First Vision, or seem to have been confused about it. | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
===Comparison to Paul's vision=== | ===Comparison to Paul's vision=== | ||
| Line 69: | Line 25: | ||
:This, too, parallels Paul’s experience. His most detailed account of the vision on the road to Damascus is the last of several recorded. (See Acts 26:9–20.) And this is the only known instance in which he related the detail about the glorified Savior prophesying Paul’s work among the Gentiles. (See Acts 26:16–18.) Why would Paul include this previously unmentioned detail only on that occasion? Probably because he was speaking to a ''Gentile'' audience, rather than to a group of Jewish Christians. Both Paul and Joseph Smith had reasons for delaying full details of their visions until the proper time and place.{{ref|And1}} | :This, too, parallels Paul’s experience. His most detailed account of the vision on the road to Damascus is the last of several recorded. (See Acts 26:9–20.) And this is the only known instance in which he related the detail about the glorified Savior prophesying Paul’s work among the Gentiles. (See Acts 26:16–18.) Why would Paul include this previously unmentioned detail only on that occasion? Probably because he was speaking to a ''Gentile'' audience, rather than to a group of Jewish Christians. Both Paul and Joseph Smith had reasons for delaying full details of their visions until the proper time and place.{{ref|And1}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===Specific First Vision Issues=== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Was the Smith family in the proper area at the proper time for Joseph's 1820 vision?{{wikilink|url=Early Smith family history}} | ||
| + | * Was Joseph Smith mistaken about religious revivals in his area in 1820?{{wikilink|url=Religious revivals in 1820}} | ||
| + | * Did Joseph Smith claim to see only one Deity in his 1832 vision account?{{wikilink|url=Only one Deity appears in the 1832 account}} | ||
| + | * Did Andrew Jensen call Joseph's heavenly visitor "an angel," rather than God?{{wikilink|url=Andrew Jenson called personage an "angel"}} | ||
| + | * Did Lucy Mack Smith, Joseph's mother, refer to "an angel," rather than God?{{wikilink|url=Prophet's mother said First Vision was of an "angel"}} | ||
| + | * Did John Taylor teach that Joseph Smith saw only one Deity?{{wikilink|url=John Taylor's understanding of the First Vision}} | ||
| + | * Was Oliver Cowdery unaware of the First Vision as late as 1834–1835? {{wikilink|url=Oliver Cowdery not aware of First Vision in 1834-35}} | ||
| + | * Did Joseph's concept of God "evolve" from a trinitarian model in the 1830s to a more heterodox idea later on?{{wikilink|url=Joseph Smith's early conception of God}} | ||
| + | * Did Joseph Smith join other churches after the First Vision, despite his later claim that he ought not to? {{wikilink|url=Joseph Smith joined other churches}} | ||
==Conclusion== | ==Conclusion== | ||
| − | Joseph's varied accounts of the First Vision were targeted at different audiences, and had different purposes. However, they show a remarkable harmony. | + | Joseph's varied accounts of the First Vision were targeted at different audiences, and had different purposes. However, they show a remarkable harmony. |
==Endnotes== | ==Endnotes== | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
#{{note|And1}} {{Ensign1|author=Richard L. Anderson|article=Parallel Prophets: Paul and Joseph Smith|date=April 1985|start=12}}{{link|url=http://library.lds.org/nxt/gateway.dll/Magazines/Ensign/1985.htm/ensign%20april%201985%20.htm/parallel%20prophets%20paul%20and%20joseph%20smith.htm?f=templates$fn=document-frame.htm$3.0$q=$x=$nc=6170}} | #{{note|And1}} {{Ensign1|author=Richard L. Anderson|article=Parallel Prophets: Paul and Joseph Smith|date=April 1985|start=12}}{{link|url=http://library.lds.org/nxt/gateway.dll/Magazines/Ensign/1985.htm/ensign%20april%201985%20.htm/parallel%20prophets%20paul%20and%20joseph%20smith.htm?f=templates$fn=document-frame.htm$3.0$q=$x=$nc=6170}} | ||
Revision as of 01:06, 1 January 2007
Contents
Criticism
Joseph Smith gave several accounts of the First Vision. Critics charge that differences in the accounts show that he changed and embellished his story over time, and that he therefore didn't have any such vision.
Source(s) of the Criticism
- Richard Abanes, Becoming Gods: A Closer Look at 21st-Century Mormonism (Harvest House Publishers: 2005).
- Isaiah Bennett, Inside Mormonism: What Mormons Really Believe (Catholic Answers: 1999).
- Grant Palmer, An Insider's View of Mormon Origins (Salt Lake City, Utah: Signature Books, 2002).
- Jerald and Sandra Tanner, The Case Against Mormonism, 2 vols., (Salt Lake City, 1967), 1:120–128.
- Jerald and Sandra Tanner, Changing World of Mormonism (Salt Lake City: 1980), 164.
- Dan Vogel, "The Earliest Mormon Concept of God," in Line Upon Line: Essays on Mormon Doctrine, edited by Gary James Bergera, (Salt Lake City: Signature Books, 1989), 17–33.
Response
Figure 1: The Sacred Grove, near Palmyra, New York, by George Edward Anderson, photograph, 1907.
Critics of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints often seek to point out differences between the various accounts which Joseph Smith gave of his First Vision. In defense of their position that the Prophet changed his story over a six year period (1832 to 1838) they claim that the earliest followers of Joseph Smith either didn’t know about the First Vision, or seem to have been confused about it.
Comparison to Paul's vision
Paul the apostle gave several accounts of his vision of the resurrected Lord while on the road to Damascus. Like Joseph Smith's account of the First Vision, Paul's accounts differ in some details but agree in the overall message. Richard Lloyd Anderson made the following comparisons.
- Many Christians who comfortably accept Paul’s vision reject Joseph Smith’s. However, they aren’t consistent in their criticisms, for most arguments against Joseph Smith’s first vision would detract from Paul’s Damascus experience with equal force.
- For instance, Joseph Smith’s credibility is attacked because the earliest known description of his vision wasn’t given until a dozen years after it happened. But Paul’s earliest known description of the Damascus appearance, found in 1 Corinthians 9꞉1, was recorded about two dozen years after his experience.
- Critics love to dwell on supposed inconsistencies in Joseph Smith’s spontaneous accounts of his first vision. But people normally give shorter and longer accounts of their own vivid experiences when retelling them more than once. Joseph Smith was cautious about public explanations of his sacred experiences until the Church grew strong and could properly publicize what God had given him. Thus, his most detailed first vision account came after several others—when he began his formal history.
- This, too, parallels Paul’s experience. His most detailed account of the vision on the road to Damascus is the last of several recorded. (See Acts 26:9–20.) And this is the only known instance in which he related the detail about the glorified Savior prophesying Paul’s work among the Gentiles. (See Acts 26:16–18.) Why would Paul include this previously unmentioned detail only on that occasion? Probably because he was speaking to a Gentile audience, rather than to a group of Jewish Christians. Both Paul and Joseph Smith had reasons for delaying full details of their visions until the proper time and place.[1]
Specific First Vision Issues
- Was the Smith family in the proper area at the proper time for Joseph's 1820 vision? FAIRWiki link
- Was Joseph Smith mistaken about religious revivals in his area in 1820? FAIRWiki link
- Did Joseph Smith claim to see only one Deity in his 1832 vision account? FAIRWiki link
- Did Andrew Jensen call Joseph's heavenly visitor "an angel," rather than God? FAIRWiki link
- Did Lucy Mack Smith, Joseph's mother, refer to "an angel," rather than God? FAIRWiki link
- Did John Taylor teach that Joseph Smith saw only one Deity? FAIRWiki link
- Was Oliver Cowdery unaware of the First Vision as late as 1834–1835? FAIRWiki link
- Did Joseph's concept of God "evolve" from a trinitarian model in the 1830s to a more heterodox idea later on? FAIRWiki link
- Did Joseph Smith join other churches after the First Vision, despite his later claim that he ought not to? FAIRWiki link
Conclusion
Joseph's varied accounts of the First Vision were targeted at different audiences, and had different purposes. However, they show a remarkable harmony.
Endnotes
- [note] Richard L. Anderson, "Parallel Prophets: Paul and Joseph Smith," Ensign (April 1985): 12.off-site