| Page
|
Claim
|
Response
|
Author's sources
|
94
|
- Brigham Young claimed that some of the Book of Mormon witnesses doubted that they had ever seen an angel.
|
|
Young, Journal of Discourses 7:164.
|
94
|
- Oliver Cowdery may have had doubts about his testimony.
|
|
- Times and Seasons 1841 vol. 2, p.482
|
96
|
- The witnesses to the Book of Mormon were "very gullible."
|
|
97
|
- David Whitmer said that God told him to separate himself from among the Latter Day Saints.
|
|
- An Address to All Believers in Christ, pp. 27-28
|
99-100
|
- Some of the Book of Mormon witnesses later followed James Strang.
|
- The witnesses never born the kind of testimony about Strang as they did about seeing and handling the plates.
- James Strang
|
|
103
|
- Martin Harris changed his religion thirteen times.
|
|
108
|
- Martin Harris said that he saw the plates with his "spiritual eyes."
|
|
108
|
- David Whitmer said that he "handled the plates," but that he "did not touch nor handle the plates."
|
|
|
108
|
- Martin Harris said that the eight witnesses never saw the plates.
|
|
- Dialogue: A Journal of Mormon Thought, Winter, 1972, pp. 83-84
|
111
|
- Material from the Presbyterian "Westminster Confession" is "probably" the source for Alma 40.
|
|
- Westminster Confession; Alma 40
|
114
|
- Joseph copied the name "Nephi" from the Apocrypha.
|
|
115
|
- The story of Moses leading the children of Israel out of Egypt was a source for the book of 1 Nephi.
|
|
115
|
- The Book of Mormon quotes Malachi many years before it was written.
|
|
- Malachi 4:1
- 1 Nephi 22:15
|
116
|
- The story of Lazarus being raised from the dead is a source for the story of Ammon.
|
|
118
|
- The story of Alma was taken from the story of Paul.
|
|
119
|
- The Book of Mormon contains material found in the New Testament.
|
|
122
|
- In the Book of Mormon, Jesus quotes a paraphrase of Moses' words found in Acts 3:22-26.
|
|
123
|
- The Greek terms "Alpha" and "Omega" appear in the Book of Mormon.
|
|
124
|
- The Book of Mormon contains the Greek name Timothy.
|
|
125
|
- Joseph Smith's mother said that he used to entertain them with stories about the ancient inhabitants of the American continent before he
translated the Book of Mormon.
|
|
- History of Joseph Smith by His Mother, 1954 ed., p.83
|
127
|
- B.H. Roberts concluded that the book View of the Hebrews could have provided a structural foundation for the Book of Mormon.
|
|
127
|
- B.H. Roberts listed a number of parallels between View of the Hebrews and the Book of Mormon.
|
|
128
|
- The Book of Mormon may have used Josiah Priest's book The Wonders of Nature as a source.
|
|
128-129
|
- The Book of Mormon contains changes that altered the original meaning of the text.
|
|
132
|
- It was claimed that the during the translation process that the proper spelling of words was given by the Lord.
|
|
133
|
- Members of the Church have claimed that the Smithsonian uses the Book of Mormon in archaeological research.
|
|
139
|
- Some Mormon archaeologists have begin to "face the truth" regarding Book of Mormon archeology by declaring that it is a "myth."
|
- Book of Mormon archaeology
- The same claim is made in One Nation Under Gods and is responded to here: [[One Nation Under Gods/Use of sources/No Book of Mormon
archaeology]]
|
- Dee Green, Dialogue: A Journal of Mormon Thought, Summer 1969, pp.76-78
|
140-141
|
- Mormon archaeologist Thomas Stuart Ferguson lost his testimony because he couldn't find any archaeological evidence for the Book of Mormon.
|
- Ferguson was not an archaeologist; he was an amateur with an inaccurate idea of what archaeology could accomplish.
- John Gee, "The Hagiography of Doubting Thomas (Review of Quest for the Gold Plates: Thomas Stuart Ferguson's Archaeological Search for the Book of Mormon)," FARMS Review of Books 10/2 (1998): 158–183. off-site
- Daniel C. Peterson and Matthew Roper, "Ein Heldenleben? On Thomas Stuart Ferguson as an Elias for Cultural Mormons (Review of: Quest for the Gold Plates: Thomas Stuart Ferguson’s Archaeological Search for the Book of Mormon)," FARMS Review 16/1 (2004): 175–220. off-site
- Daniel C. Peterson, "On the New World Archaeological Foundation (Review of: Behind the Mask of Mormonism)," FARMS Review 16/1 (2004): 221–234. off-site
|
|
141-142
|
- Lehi would never have written using an Egyptian language. Jewish scriptures could not have been written in Egyptian.
|
|
144
|
- None of the characters on the Anthon transcript bear any resemblance to known hieroglypics found in the New World.
|
|